SAT INFRA

Overview of Sat Infra

In the realm of real estate and construction, choosing the right builder can profoundly impact your home-buying experience. One such builder to examine is Sat Infra, which currently operates in Gujarat. While they may seem like a viable option on the surface, a closer look at their legal track record reveals a concerning pattern that potential buyers should consider before making any commitments.

Legal Background

Sat Infra has had a rough time in the legal arena, having faced a total of 2 complaints. Disturbingly, the builder has lost both cases, which raises questions about their reliability and adherence to regulatory guidelines.

Details of the Cases

1. Failed Submission of Compliance Report: In this case, Sat Infra claimed to have completed the project and submitted the necessary documents to GUJRERA (Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority). However, GUJRERA found that the builder failed to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Sat Infra that the builder lost reveals several key points across the spectrum of disputes encountered by the builder. The cases highlight two primary themes: non-compliance with regulatory requirements and delays in submitting mandatory documentation.

In terms of non-compliance, the builder faced penalties due to their inability to adhere to the established regulations, particularly concerning project deadlines and financial reporting. This reflects a broader pattern where builders may prioritize their operations over the obligations set forth by local authorities, leading to legal repercussions.

Delays in submitting essential documents also stand out as a significant theme in these cases. The builder had committed to providing an annual audit report by a specific date (10/03/2020) but failed to do so, which resulted in a fine of Rs. 40,000 and a court directive to fulfill this obligation. This instance underscores a common issue in the real estate …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Sat Infra, which it lost revealed several insights into the company's legal challenges and operational practices. These cases predominantly fell under a few common themes, including Regulatory Non-compliance, where the builder faced issues related to adhering to local construction regulations and submission of necessary documentation; Penalties for Delays, where financial penalties were imposed due to delays in project submissions; and Project Completion Disputes, which arose from conflicts over the project status and completion claims.

One notable trend in the cases is that Sat Infra often contested penalties imposed by regulatory bodies, claiming that they had completed their projects and submitted all required documentation in a timely manner. However, the opposing parties—often regulatory authorities—consistently pointed to failures in submission processes, such as the lack of proper compliance reports within the required time frames.

The builder's litigation was frequently triggered …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis