No Logo Available

SATBIR SINGH KADIAN AND SONS HUF

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: N/A
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate development, the legal standing of a builder can significantly influence the confidence of potential buyers. Today, we will take a closer look at SATBIR SINGH KADIAN AND SONS HUF, examining their legal history through complaints, cases won, and cases lost. While the data available is limited, it is essential for potential buyers to glean insights into the builder's reputation and reliability.

Legal Overview of SATBIR SINGH KADIAN AND SONS HUF

SATBIR SINGH KADIAN AND SONS HUF has encountered legal challenges as indicated by the data. With a total of 1 complaint filed against them, the outcome of this particular case is noteworthy. The builder has won 0 cases and lost 1 case, suggesting a concerning trend that potential clients should consider seriously.

Summary of the Legal Case

  • Case Lost: The builder faced a legal case that culminated in a dismissal due to the non-appearance of the complainant. This outcome indicates that there might have been issues related to communication, documentation, or preparation for the hearing, which ultimately did not play in the builder's favor. Unfortunately, specific details regarding the claims made by both the appellant and respondent are not provided, limiting a deeper understanding of the underlying issues.

Analysis of Legal Trends

Common Factors in Lost Cases

Given the provided legal history, we can identify the following patterns:

  • Non-Appearance Issues: The notable absence of the complainant in the case led to a dismissal, which may suggest a lack of proactive engagement or unresolved issues that could have been managed better prior to the hearing.
  • Communication Gaps: The single case lost points toward potential pitfalls in communication either between the builder and the complainant or within the builder's own organizational structure.

Common Factors in Won Cases

In this instance, there are no cases won to analyze, which further emphasizes the need for potential buyers to tread cautiously. A record of zero successful outcomes raises questions about the builder's efficacy in resolving disputes or standing firm in legal challenges.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, SATBIR SINGH KADIAN AND SONS HUF has a concerning legal track record. With one complaint filed and no cases won, potential buyers should approach with caution. The single loss due to the complainant's non-appearance could reflect broader issues in oversight and management that merit thorough examination before proceeding with any transactions.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Conduct Thorough Research: Before making any commitments, investigate the builder's overall reputation, including online reviews and industry ratings, to gain insights into others' experiences.
  2. Consult Legal Experts: Consider seeking legal advice to better understand the implications of the builder's legal history and protect your interests.
  3. Request Documentation: Ask for all relevant documentation for your project, including past project successes, customer feedback, and any legal dealings, to ensure the builder's reliability.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  • Check References: Always talk to previous clients to verify the builder's quality of work and reliability.
  • Visit Past Projects: If possible, visit completed projects to assess the quality firsthand.
  • Analyze Financial Stability: Ensure that the builder is financially stable to reduce the risk of project delays or abandonment.
  • Understand Contracts Well: Take the time to read and understand all terms and conditions within any contract, ensuring clarity on timelines and expectations.

In summary, while SATBIR SINGH KADIAN AND SONS HUF may have their merits, their legal standing demands careful consideration from prospective buyers. Proceed with diligence and ensure that your investment is secure.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Municipal Orders Disputes over Land Classification Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Satbir Singh Kadian and Sons HUF, which it lost, reveals critical insights into the builder's legal disputes and operations. A comprehensive examination of the case summaries indicates recurring themes that highlight the nature of conflicts the builder faced in the legal arena.

One prevalent theme is 'Delayed Possession Claims'. In these cases, the builder seems to have faced issues related to the timing of property handovers, either directly through client complaints or indirectly through third-party disputes. Another theme that arises is 'Non-compliance with Municipal Orders'. This indicates challenges related to adhering to local regulations or mandates which could further jeopardize project compliance.

Furthermore, disputes over 'Land Classification' appear to be a noteworthy concern. Misunderstandings or disagreements regarding land use and classification could lead to prolonged litigation. Lastly, the theme of 'Penalties for Project Delays' suggests that the builder was often at odds over penalties imposed due to alleged delays in project completions, which may have triggered further court actions.

The recurring reasons for the builder initiating these cases likely stem from contesting penalties imposed due to project delays or disputing claims related to non-compliance that could severely impact their operations. These disputes may also reflect a struggle with understanding or navigating complex regulatory environments.

As for why the builder lost these cases, several patterns emerge. Common reasons include insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements, and non-appearance in court proceedings. Another significant factor seems to be a lack of understanding of the land and project classification rules, leading to further complications in their legal standing. These factors combined suggest that while the builder may have had claims worth pursuing, a combination of procedural issues and legal missteps led to unfavorable outcomes.

This dictionary captures the essential themes and provides a structured summary of the analysis of the cases related to the builder, which can serve as a useful resource for prospective buyers in the real estate market.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review