SATELLITE INFRA & REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the vast landscape of real estate development, choosing the right builder is crucial for a successful investment. One such entity is Satellite Infra & Real Estate Private Limited, a builder operating primarily in Madhya Pradesh. In this analysis, we will delve into the builder's legal performance, particularly in relation to complaints and court cases, to help potential buyers make informed decisions.

Legal Performance Overview

Complaints and Case Outcomes

• Number of Complaints: 3
• Cases Won: 1
• Cases Lost: 2

Analysis of Legal Cases

Cases the Builder Filed and Won

1. The builder filed a complaint that was ultimately withdrawn, leading to the closure of proceedings. This indicates a scenario that might have stemmed from miscommunication or an expected outcome without further merit.

Cases Filed Against the Builder

The builder faced two notable cases, both of which they lost. Here is a closer look at the details:

• Appellant Claims: In both instances, applicants accused the builder of failing to develop the plot and provide possession within an agreed timeframe, resulting in mental distress and financial loss.
• Respondent Claims: The builder defended themselves by indicating that the delays were due to unforeseen circumstances and argued that the applicants had not adhered to the terms outlined in their agreements.
• Final Verdict: The Adjudicating Officer ruled against the builder in both cases, directing them to compensate the applicants for mental distress and legal expenses incurred.

Identifying Patterns

Patterns in Lost Cases

The significant factor in the cases lost by Satellite Infra & Real Estate is the consistent claim from applicants regarding delays in development and possession of their plots. The builder’s defense centered around unforeseen circumstances, but this rationale did not prove sufficient in the eyes of the adjudicating authorities, resulting in liability for compensation.

Patterns in Won Cases

In the one case that the builder won, the nature of the complaint was not directly against an applicant’s claim, implying a more procedural or arguably less contentious situation rather than a failed project delivery or customer dissatisfaction.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Satellite Infra & Real Estate Private Limited exhibits a problematic history in customer relations, particularly related to project delays and failure to meet commitments. With two losses out of three cases, potential buyers should exercise caution.

Recommendations for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Investigate customer reviews and ratings about the builder from previous clients to gauge satisfaction levels and common issues.
2. Request Documentation: Ensure that all agreements, including timelines for project completion and possession, are documented and clearly understood.
3. Stay Informed: Keep up with any ongoing legal matters or regulatory feedback regarding the builder, as these can signal operational reliability.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Check Licensing and Registration: Ensure that any builder you consider is properly licensed and operates within the legal framework of your region.
• Assess Financial Stability: A builder’s financial soundness can be a good indicator of their capability to complete projects.
• Visit Previous Projects: If possible, visit completed projects by the builder to assess quality and construction standards in person.

Choosing to invest in real estate is a significant decision. Evaluating builders like Satellite Infra & Real Estate Private Limited through an analytical lens can mitigate risks associated with property investments.

Analysis of the cases filed against Satellite Infra & Real Estate Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, with multiple applicants alleging that the builder failed to develop their plots and provide possession within the agreed timeframe. This delay led to claims of mental distress and financial loss, which were central to the complaints.

A common thread in these cases was the builder's defense, which consistently cited unforeseen circumstances as the cause for the delays. However, the builder also counter-claimed that the applicants had not complied with the terms of their agreements. This indicates a significant communication gap or contractual misunderstanding between the parties involved, which is a recurring theme in real estate disputes.

The reasons people brought cases to court primarily involved contesting the builder's failure to adhere to the promised timelines and seeking compensation for their distress and losses. The builder's inability to fulfill their contractual obligations was the main trigger for litigation in these cases.

Examining the outcomes reveals that the builder lost due to an inability to adequately address the applicants' grievances or provide valid reasons for the delays that did not resonate with the Adjudicating Officer. The decision to direct the builder to pay compensation in both cases highlights a pattern where the legal system favors the homeowners' rights to timely possession and adequate treatment by builders.

Overall, these cases shine a light on the importance of clear communication, adherence to timelines, and contractual compliance in the real estate sector. They serve as a cautionary tale for builders about the legal ramifications of failing to meet their commitments and for buyers to be vigilant and informed about their rights.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Satellite Infra & Real Estate Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information.

The cases are primarily grouped under two key themes:

• Fraudulent Claims: This category involves instances where accusations made against the builder were alleged to be unfounded or misleading.
• Withdrawal of Complaints: This encompasses situations where the opposition decided to retract their complaints, indicating a potential lack of merit in the claims initially made.

The builder commonly brought such cases to court to contest allegations that they felt were unsubstantiated or fraudulent. These legal actions seem to stem from a reactive approach to defend the builder’s reputation and operational integrity, particularly when faced with accusations that could potentially tarnish its image or disrupt its projects.

In this specific case summary, the builder's victory was underscored by the withdrawal of the complaint by the opposing party, which suggests that the claims were possibly exaggerated or lacked the necessary evidence for continued legal proceedings. The ability to successfully defend against such accusations indicates a pattern where the builder demonstrated due diligence in its operations and maintained clear communications to prevent misunderstandings.

Furthermore, this analysis sheds light on the broader real estate market dynamics. It serves as a reminder that in the competitive world of real estate, builders can occasionally find themselves at odds with buyers, some of whom may resort to false claims or misunderstandings about contract obligations or project status. Therefore, builders like Satellite Infra & Real Estate Private Limited, with a strong track record of defending against unjust claims, can be positioned as more reliable entities within the industry.

To potential buyers, this analysis emphasizes the importance of making informed decisions. While legitimate disputes undoubtedly arise in the real estate market, it is crucial to approach claims carefully and rely on verified information before forming judgments about a builder's reputation. This case serves as a reminder that the legal system can protect builders from unjust claims, thereby contributing to their overall credibility and trustworthiness in the eyes of prospective clients.