SATISH BORA & ASSOCIATES

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder can significantly impact your home-buying experience. One such player in the market is Satish Bora & Associates, primarily operating in Maharashtra. While their portfolio may seem enticing at first glance, a deeper analysis into their legal history reveals important insights for potential buyers.

Legal Track Record

Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases

Satish Bora & Associates has encountered a total of one complaint. The builder has faced challenges in legal settings, having lost one case. Notably, there were no cases won by the builder, which raises questions about their reliability in fulfilling contractual obligations and maintaining good business practices.

Details of Legal Cases

The singular case filed against Satish Bora & Associates showed interesting dynamics:

• Appellant's Claim: The appellant argued that the Authority did not provide enough opportunity for the parties to present their case.
• Builder's Response: The builder assured the court of their intent to cooperate with the Authority to expedite the matter and avoid unnecessary delays.
• Final Verdict: The appeal was partly allowed, and the case was remanded back to the Authority for reconsideration.

This indicates a recurring issue, where the builder might not have presented a sufficiently solid case, leading to the necessity of further review by the Authority rather than a straightforward victory.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Lost Cases

The singular case lost by Satish Bora & Associates illustrates some notable patterns:

• A common factor appears to be a lack of adequate preparation or defense, as suggested by the appellant's satisfaction with the Authority's decision-making process. Their need for a clearer opportunity to present their case indicates potential oversight on the builder's part.

Won Cases

Interestingly, while Satish Bora & Associates has not won cases, the matters they have faced in court indicate a reliance on procedural technicalities rather than presenting a strong, unequivocal case. The appeal remand hints at a possible vulnerability in their legal strategy.

Conclusion

Based on the provided data, Satish Bora & Associates presents a mixed bag for potential buyers. While their legal history is not extensive, the existing complaint and the lost case suggest inadequacies in management or execution that could affect future projects.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Due Diligence: Always carry out significant research on a builder's previous projects and their legal standings to ensure credibility.
2. Assess Communication: Clear and confident communication from a builder can be a sign of their reliability. Take note of how well they articulate project timelines and commitments.
3. Seek Reviews: Look for feedback from previous buyers, as their experiences can provide insights into the builder’s work ethics and quality of construction.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Research: Gather as much information as possible about builders in your area.
• Understanding Contracts: Make sure to review all contract terms thoroughly. Seek clarification on anything unclear before signing.
• Check credentials: Verify the builder's legal existence, reputation, and any certifications that validate their capability.

In summary, while Satish Bora & Associates operates in Maharashtra’s real estate market, potential buyers need to weigh their options carefully considering the information at hand.

Analysis of the cases filed against Satish Bora & Associates, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The primary types of cases can be grouped into: insufficient opportunities for defense, cooperation and expedited decision-making, and remand and reconsideration of orders.

In the case of insufficient opportunities for defense, the appellant claimed that the Authority did not provide adequate chance for the parties to present their case. This highlights a common reason for litigation, where builders may feel their rights to due process have been infringed upon, leading them to contest decisions made without their input.

The theme of cooperation and expedited decision-making is evident in the respondents' claim, where they stated their willingness to cooperate with the Authority to reach a swift decision without seeking adjournments. This indicates another pattern where cases may stem from disagreements over the pace of the decision-making process or the level of cooperation required from the builder’s side.

The verdict in the case, which set aside the original order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, illustrates the recurring issue of reconsideration of orders. This shows that builders may often find themselves in litigation due to a perceived unfairness in the initial ruling, which necessitates a reevaluation of the case.

The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include the failure to provide sufficient opportunities for the builder to defend their position and the misunderstanding or misapplication of regulatory requirements. The patterns emerging from these disputes suggest that Satish Bora & Associates may have faced challenges related to the adherence to due process and effective communication with regulatory authorities, which are critical in the real estate sector.