CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the realm of real estate construction and development, making an informed choice about the builder is crucial for potential buyers. One such builder, Satsudha Investments Private Limited, operates primarily within Haryana and has recently been under scrutiny due to some legal challenges. With only one complaint against them noted, it is important to delve into the specifics to assess their reliability and credibility.
Upon reviewing the legal case involving Satsudha Investments, it is evident that the builder won one case but lost another. Let's examine the details:
Satsudha Investments Private Limited shows a mixed record in legal disputes, having lost one case which raises concerns regarding their reliability in fulfilling project timelines and satisfying regulatory obligations. For potential buyers considering investing in properties developed by this builder, it is essential to remain vigilant and ensure that detailed inquiries are conducted.
With due diligence, prospective buyers can mitigate risks when considering investment with builders like Satsudha Investments Private Limited.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Satsudha Investments Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: delayed project registration and non-compliance with regulatory requirements.
The first theme, delayed project registration, encompasses claims made by the appellants regarding the builder's failure to develop projects within the stipulated timeframe. As seen in the provided summary, the appellant sought directions to register the project with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), asserting that the project was not completed on time and therefore required compliance with the regulatory framework established by the Act. This highlights a pattern where individuals may bring cases to court due to frustrations related to project delays and the builder’s accountability under the law.
The second theme, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, is closely tied to the first. The builder's defense often centered around claims of ongoing work at the time of the Act's commencement and thus asserted that registration was not necessary. However, the authority ruled against the builder, mandating registration within a specified timeframe. This indicates a common reason for the builder's losses: failure to adhere to regulatory requirements and a misunderstanding of their obligations under the RERA.
The patterns emerging from these cases demonstrate that individuals typically contest the builder’s actions when they either delay project timelines or fail to comply with the necessary legal frameworks. The builder’s losses usually stem from insufficient evidence to support their claims of compliance or timely progress, along with a lack of adherence to critical regulatory guidelines. Overall, these disputes serve as a cautionary tale for buyers regarding the importance of verifying a builder's reliability and regulatory compliance before making a purchase.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!