CIN | U70101WB2004PTC097736 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 41 NETAJI SUBHAS ROAD4TH FLOOR R NO 40 KOLKATA WB 700001 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Sattva Developers Private Limited is a real estate builder operating exclusively in the state of Karnataka. Like many builders in the industry, Sattva has faced challenges, which have been reflected in certain legal disputes. In this blog post, we will explore the builder’s legal standing, analyze their performance in legal cases, and ultimately provide potential buyers with insights to aid in their decision-making.
According to the available data, Sattva Developers has a record of 2 complaints filed against them. Notably, they have lost both cases. This statistic raises questions regarding their business practices and customer satisfaction, particularly concerning the fulfillment of sale agreements.
While Sattva Developers has not won any legal cases, it is essential to analyze the cases that were initiated:
From the data available, Sattva Developers holds a concerning legal track record with complaints without successful defenses in the cases that went to court. Buyers may perceive this as an indicator of potential risks associated with investing in properties developed by this builder.
If you are considering purchasing a property from Sattva Developers or any builder, keep the following tips in mind:
Sattva Developers Private Limited, with its challenging legal history, serves as a cautionary tale for homebuyers in Karnataka. The presence of complaints and the results of legal disputes highlight the importance of doing comprehensive due diligence before making a real estate investment. Prospective buyers should weigh their decisions carefully and take steps to protect their interests when considering properties from Sattva Developers or any builder in the market.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Sattva Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Breach of Sale Agreement Claims and Delayed Possession Claims.
The cases often revolved around the complainants alleging that the builder had breached the sale agreement, resulting in claims primarily seeking compensation for the perceived violations. The builder, on the other hand, consistently maintained that they had completed the units and requested the complainants to take possession, indicating a fundamental disagreement on the status of the project and the obligations under the sale agreement.
A pattern emerges from these summaries where common triggers for litigation include disagreements over project completion timelines and the builder's adherence to the terms laid out in the sale agreements. People brought cases to court largely due to a lack of fulfillment of their expectations in terms of timely possession and adherence to contractual obligations.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to the inability of either party to come to a mutually acceptable resolution, leading to the withdrawal of the complaints. The withdrawals might suggest that the claims made by the complainants may not have been substantiated with sufficient evidence, or there could have been other underlying issues that prompted a settlement before a verdict was reached. Nonetheless, these cases highlight the ongoing challenges faced by builders to meet the expectations of buyers while navigating the complexities of real estate transactions.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!