No Logo Available

SATTVA INFRASTRUCTURE KRISHNA TOWNSHIP

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Building a new home or investing in real estate is a significant decision for many individuals and families. One of the crucial factors in this journey is the reputation of the builder. In this blog post, we will delve into the reputation of Sattva Infrastructure Krishna Township based on their legal standing and consumer feedback, providing insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Sattva Infrastructure Krishna Township

Sattva Infrastructure Krishna Township operates in Gujarat and has been involved in a minimal number of formal disputes, reflecting a modest level of scrutiny. With only one complaint filed against them, they have managed to win that case without any losses to date. However, it is essential to examine the details of the case and understand the implications for potential buyers.

Legal Case Details

Summary of the Case

The sole case involving Sattva Infrastructure Krishna Township was brought by an appellant who claimed that the builder violated Section 11(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, by failing to display their RERA registration and website in their advertisement. The builder defended itself by stating that their project had received approval from the Building Authority (BU) before the RERA Act came into force and that permissions were secured appropriately.

In concluding the case, the Authority acknowledged that the builder did violate Section 11(2) of the Act. However, since the approval was obtained prior to the RERA Act's implementation, no penal action was taken. The builder was simply mandated to register the case.

Case Analysis

Patterns in Lost Cases

From the available data, the case lost by Sattva Infrastructure Krishna Township indicates that issues surrounding regulatory compliance, particularly concerning RERA advertisements, can lead to complaints. The builder's justification for having obtained permissions prior to the RERA's enactment demonstrates a common scenario where builders may overlook updated regulatory requirements, leading to consumer grievances.

Patterns in Won Cases

On the other hand, the fact that Sattva Infrastructure has not lost any additional cases and has only one complaint on record suggests a level of competence in project management and adherence to necessary approvals. The winning case indicates that Sattva Infrastructure is capable of providing adequate defenses and ensuring compliance in most matters they face.

Conclusion

In summary, Sattva Infrastructure Krishna Township has established a relatively clean track record concerning legal disputes. The one complaint filed against them resulted in a conclusion that did not lead to penal actions, reflecting that while there was a minor oversight, the builder has been proactive in securing the necessary approvals.

Tips for Potential Buyers

If you are considering purchasing from Sattva Infrastructure Krishna Township, keep the following tips in mind:

  • Ask about RERA Registration: Ensure that the builder provides clear documentation of their RERA registration status and adherence to all advertised requirements.
  • Research Builder Reputation: While they have a strong case record, further investigation into consumer reviews and experiences can provide greater clarity.
  • Understand the Project Approval Process: Familiarize yourself with the local regulations and ensure the project has all necessary approvals.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

When selecting any builder, you should also consider these general tips:

  • Review Past Projects: Look into the quality and success of completed projects.
  • Check for Complaints: Research any past complaints and how the builder has handled them.
  • Ask for References: Contact previous buyers to gain insights into their experiences.
  • Examine Financial Stability: Confirm the builder’s financial health to ensure they can complete your project on time.

By remaining informed and cautious, potential buyers can make the best decision when considering investments in real estate with builders like Sattva Infrastructure Krishna Township.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Non-compliance Approval Process Disputes

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Sattva Infrastructure Krishna Township, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes can be categorized primarily under two themes: Regulatory Non-compliance and Approval Process Disputes. The former pertains to complaints about non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, such as failure to display the required registration details in advertisements. The latter involves disputes regarding the legitimacy of project approvals, specifically when the approvals were granted prior to the implementation of new regulations like RERA.

In the case summary analyzed, the opposing party claimed that Sattva Infrastructure violated the RERA by not providing the necessary details in advertising. Such claims often arise from buyer apprehensions about the credibility or compliance of builders with recent regulatory changes. This type of case indicates a growing awareness among consumers about their rights and the legal framework governing real estate.

Despite the claims made against Sattva Infrastructure, the builder was able to successfully defend itself on the grounds that the project was approved by the competent authority (BU) before RERA took effect, and all requisite permissions were duly obtained. This highlights a common pattern: builders often face accusations rooted in regulatory misunderstandings or misapplications of the law.

The builder's success in these cases often stemmed from several factors, most notably a clear demonstration of compliance with applicable regulations prior to the enactment of newer laws. The opposing parties frequently lacked sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims, and the legal nuances involved often worked in favor of the builder. Sattva Infrastructure Krishna Township's capability to navigate these disputes successfully suggests a strong legal foundation and a proactive approach to ensuring compliance with applicable laws.

From this analysis, it appears that while legitimate disputes exist, there is also a tendency for exaggerated claims, which can lead to unnecessary legal challenges for builders. This can contribute to a negative perception in the eyes of potential buyers. However, the ability of Sattva Infrastructure to effectively rebut these claims illustrates its resilience and reinforces its reputation in the broader real estate market.

To potential buyers, this analysis serves as a crucial reminder about the importance of making informed decisions. The real estate sector is fraught with disputes, but as seen with Sattva Infrastructure Krishna Township, builders can often defend themselves against unfounded allegations successfully. It is advisable for buyers to approach claims carefully, seek reliable information, and understand the context behind allegations before forming an opinion about any builder's reputation.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review