CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the realm of real estate development, the credibility of a builder is often scrutinized through their legal performance and client satisfaction. Saturn Advisory Service Private Limited has made notable strides in the industry, particularly within Maharashtra. In this post, we will delve into their legal track record and provide insights for potential buyers.
Saturn Advisory Service Private Limited has faced a total of four complaints but has emerged victorious in all these legal battles, with a remarkable record of 4 cases won and 0 cases lost. This creates an impression of resilience and effective legal strategy, enhancing the builder's reputation in the market.
The builder has dealt with multiple cases involving claims against ex-parte orders. Here’s a closer look at the intricacies of these cases:
Due to the lack of lost cases, there are no patterns or factors that emerge from negative outcomes. Instead, the absence of losses indicates a strong foothold in legal conflict resolution.
Overall, Saturn Advisory Service Private Limited exhibits an impressive legal track record. The builder not only successfully counters claims but also engages strategically in legal proceedings. For potential buyers, this suggests a reputable builder likely committed to protecting their interests.
In summary, Saturn Advisory Service Private Limited stands out in the competitive real estate landscape of Maharashtra, driven by a successful legal track record that instills confidence in potential buyers.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Saturn Advisory Service Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information.
In examining the summaries, we can categorize the disputes into several recurring themes, namely Ex-parte Orders and Impleadment of Respondents.
The first theme involves cases where the builder challenged ex-parte orders, successfully getting them recalled and set aside.
The second theme centers around the builder’s efforts to include additional parties, such as banks, in ongoing legal matters with the approval of the opposing parties, leading to fruitful outcomes for the builder in court.
The builder commonly brought these cases to court primarily to contest ex-parte orders that may have been issued without complete evidence or consideration of their arguments.
Additionally, by seeking to implead other respondents such as banks, the builder aimed to ensure all relevant parties were included in the litigation process, which can be key to a fair resolution of disputes.
The common reasons for the builder's success in these cases can be attributed to factors such as a lack of sufficient evidence from opposing parties, failure to comply with legal requirements, and procedural missteps by the respondents.
In instances of ex-parte orders, it appears the builder was able to demonstrate that the necessary formalities were not observed, leading to the favorable outcome of having such orders set aside. Furthermore, the consent given by other respondents regarding impleadment indicates a collaborative approach that often mitigates disputes effectively.
This analysis portrays a builder that handles such legal matters with a robust strategy, reflecting a solid track record of defending itself against what may be seen as unwarranted claims. It is important to recognize in the real estate sector that allegations against builders can sometimes be unfounded or exaggerated.
Saturn Advisory Service Private Limited has shown resilience and competence in navigating the legal complexities, thus maintaining a reputation that, while challenged, remains strong against the backdrop of litigation.
For potential buyers, this underscores the necessity of making informed decisions in the real estate market. While legitimate disputes certainly arise, the analysis of these cases highlights that builders like Saturn Advisory Service Private Limited often have the means to effectively contest unjust claims.
It is crucial for buyers to approach allegations and accusations with caution, seeking reliable information and understanding the legal context before arriving at conclusions regarding a builder's character and reliability.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!