
CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering a property investment, understanding a builder’s track record is crucial for potential buyers. In this post, we delve into Satyam Developers, an entity with projects in Gujarat and Maharashtra. We will look into their legal standing based on the complaints and cases they have faced.
Overview of Satyam Developers
Satyam Developers has faced three complaints, of which they have won one and lost two. This alarming ratio raises questions about the company’s operational practices and the experiences of previous buyers.
Legal Case Breakdown
1. Cases Where the Builder Filed and LostIn one particular case, the builder claimed that the delays in possession were due to several factors, including:
- Delays caused by slum dwellers vacating the plot.
- Limited construction space.
- Extreme delays in the issuance of occupancy certificates.
- Disputes between partners.
- Financial challenges related to loan approvals.
- Crisis management due to GST and RERA regulations.
- …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Satyam Developers that it lost reveals several key points across the spectrum of its legal disputes.
The cases against Satyam Developers can primarily be grouped into two main themes: regulatory compliance issues and failure to submit mandatory reports. The first theme encompasses a broad range of disputes predominantly centered around the builder's adherence to the laws and regulations governing real estate projects. In this context, the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) has played a significant role in overseeing the builder’s operations, particularly concerning the project known as 'Satyam Hills.'
One of the most notable reasons people have brought cases against Satyam Developers is its failure to comply with regulatory requirements, specifically regarding project reporting. The builder was fined for not submitting quarterly reports as mandated by the law. This highlights a pattern where the builder has faced legal consequences due to …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Satyam Developers, which it lost, reveals significant insights into the challenges faced by the builder in the realm of real estate development. The examination of these cases brings to light various common themes that can help future buyers understand the dynamics and risks involved when engaging with builders like Satyam Developers.
- Delayed Possession Claims: A recurring issue highlighted in the cases is the failure to deliver possession of properties within the stipulated timelines. The builder attributed these delays to external factors beyond their control, such as delays in obtaining occupancy certificates, conflicts with slum dwellers, and financial constraints. However, the prevailing sentiment among respondents suggests that the builder did not uphold their contractual obligations, leading to claims for interest and compensation.
- Regulatory Non-compliance: The builder's difficulties in complying with municipal regulations and legal requirements also marked several disputes. This aspect …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into several common themes:
1. Delayed Possession Claims: These cases typically arise when buyers feel that the builder has not provided possession of their property within the agreed timeframe. Commonly, buyers seek compensation or interest for the delay, citing various reasons impacting the timeline.2. Disputes Over Project Delays: This theme emerges when buyers contest the builder's actions, claiming that project delays result from negligence or non-compliance. The narratives usually involve buyers arguing for penalties against builders for not delivering on their promises.
3. Claims of Unforeseen Circumstances: Builders frequently cite challenges such as legal disputes, financial issues, or regulatory obstacles that impact project timelines. Such claims can undermine arguments from buyers when the builder's reasons stem from legitimate issues beyond their …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!