No Logo Available

SATYAM ESTATE DEVELOPERS

  • No of Complaints: 1
  • States (Active in): Gujarat
CIN Not Available
Year Established Not Available
Address Not Available
Company Status Not Available

In the world of real estate development, transparency, accountability, and reliability play crucial roles in establishing trust between buyers and builders. Today, we turn our attention to Satyam Estate Developers, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat. We will examine their legal standing, assess past complaints, and offer insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Satyam Estate Developers

Satyam Estate Developers has attracted attention due to a minimal number of complaints filed against them, totaling just one. However, it's critical to note that this single complaint resulted in the builder losing the case, which might raise concerns for prospective buyers.

Legal Case Breakdown

The legal case involving Satyam Estate Developers revolved around their project 'Pushkar 2.' Here are the key details from the case:

  • Appellant Claim: The appellant claimed that the builder had failed to submit quarterly reports as mandated by the RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) Act, suggesting a lack of transparency and compliance.
  • Respondent Claim: In response, Satyam Estate Developers asserted that there was no deliberate intention to violate the law and requested that they not be penalized.
  • Final Verdict: Ultimately, the authority found in favor of the appellant and imposed a fine of Rs. 50,000 on the builder for their non-compliance with the provisions of the RERA Act.

From this case, we can glean some essential insights. Given that Satyam Estate Developers has not won any legal battles, this raises questions about their operational practices and legal adherence. The lone loss underscores the importance of compliance and maintaining proper records in the fast-evolving real estate market.

Patterns Identified

  • Common Factors in Lost Cases: The primary issue in the case lost by Satyam Estate Developers was evidently related to documentation and compliance with regulatory timelines. Such lapses point towards potential organizational shortcomings in maintaining transparency and fulfilling legal obligations.
  • Common Factors in Won Cases: Notably, the builder has not recorded any wins in legal battles, highlighting a critical area of concern. It raises alarms for potential buyers regarding the builder’s reliability and adherence to laws and regulations.

Conclusion

Based on the provided data, Satyam Estate Developers shows a concerning trend with a notable case loss and lack of victorious outcomes in legal disputes. For potential buyers, this warrants a cautious approach. It is essential to investigate the builder's past performance, compliance with regulations, and customer reviews before making a significant investment.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate the builder’s history, including customer reviews and any legal disputes. This will provide insight into their reliability.
  2. Request Documentation: Ensure you request and review all relevant documentation related to the properties and any prior projects. This is particularly important for compliance with the RERA Act.
  3. Understand Regulatory Compliance: Familiarize yourself with the RERA provisions and ensure the builder maintains all necessary compliance to avoid future complications.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  • Check Credentials: Always verify the builder’s registration status and credibility in the market.
  • Assess Financial Stability: A builder's financial health can indicate their ability to complete a project on time.
  • Visit Previous Projects: If possible, visit completed projects by the builder to evaluate quality and workmanship first-hand.

In conclusion, while Satyam Estate Developers currently operate with minimal complaints, their track record in legal disputes suggests a need for further diligence from prospective buyers. Purchasing real estate is a significant investment, and it's paramount to choose wisely.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Non-compliance with RERA Act Project Reporting Delays Regulatory Violations

Analysis of the cases filed against Satyam Estate Developers, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across their disputes. The cases primarily revolved around three critical areas: non-compliance with the RERA Act, delays in project reporting, and regulatory violations.

The first type of case involved penalties for failing to adhere to the RERA Act, particularly concerning timely project reporting. In one notable case, the builder was fined for not submitting quarterly reports for their project 'Pushkar 2' as required. This highlights a pattern where the builder faced legal consequences due to a lack of compliance with regulatory reporting obligations.

A common reason for these legal disputes was the builder's failure to fulfill their obligations under the RERA Act. People brought cases to court primarily to contest the non-compliance and the resultant penalties imposed by the authority. There was also a recurring theme of the builder's defense—that they had not intentionally violated the provisions—indicating a systemic issue with their operational practices or adherence to legal counsel.

The conclusion drawn from the outcomes of these cases is that Satyam Estate Developers consistently lost due to insufficient adherence to the regulations set forth by the RERA Act. The authority's imposition of fines serves as a regulatory check on builders to ensure they meet their legal obligations, and in this case, the builder's failures led to financial penalties.

Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to consider a builder’s track record with regulatory compliance when making informed purchasing decisions.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
1P0€0R-180/2018 Gujarat The promoter, Satyam Estate Developers, was fined… ["Non-submission of… {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… Gujarat Real Estate… Satyam Estate Devel… https://drive.google.com/uc?id=19Miszb876qAbnCSPT6GDTZi206QovWRC

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins