SECTOR ONE ONE THREE GATEVIDA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

A Closer Look at SECTOR ONE ONE THREE GATEVIDA DEVELOPERS: A Builder's Track Record

When it comes to selecting a builder for your new home, it's crucial to consider their track record and legal standing. One such builder, SECTOR ONE ONE THREE GATEVIDA DEVELOPERS Private Limited, has garnered attention due to its legal case history and customer satisfaction metrics. In this blog post, we will delve into the available data regarding this builder, examining their history of complaints and legal disputes to better inform potential buyers.

Overview of SECTOR ONE ONE THREE GATEVIDA DEVELOPERS

Name: SECTOR ONE ONE THREE GATEVIDA DEVELOPERS Private Limited
States with Projects: Haryana
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1

Legal Case Details

SECTOR ONE ONE THREE GATEVIDA DEVELOPERS has faced a single legal complaint, which they ultimately lost. Here's a brief summary of the case:

1. Case Summary:
   - Appellant Claim: The appellant claimed that there was a dispute between the parties but it was settled amicably.
   - Respondent Claim: The respondent maintained that a settlement agreement was signed, indicating that the dispute was resolved satisfactorily for both parties.
   - Final Verdict: The case was disposed of due to the existence of the settlement agreement.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Patterns in Cases Lost

The builder's sole lost case reveals some critical insights:

• Settlement Agreement: The case was concluded based on a settlement agreement, which suggests that while the builder may not have been able to win in court, an amicable resolution was reached. This indicates that they are potentially open to negotiations and compromise when disputes arise.
• Nature of Complaints: The complaint emphasizes that the dispute could be settled without further escalation, reflecting a possibly cooperative approach to conflict resolution.

Patterns in Cases Won

SECTOR ONE ONE THREE GATEVIDA DEVELOPERS does not have any cases won, which may raise some concerns for potential buyers. An absence of successful legal outcomes could signal issues in client satisfaction or adherence to contracts, underscoring the importance of thorough due diligence before making a purchase.

Conclusion

Based on the data available, SECTOR ONE ONE THREE GATEVIDA DEVELOPERS Private Limited presents a unique case. With one complaint and a loss recorded in their legal history, potential buyers should proceed with caution. Understanding the circumstances around their legal disputes may provide insight into their business practices.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Research Thoroughly: Investigate the builder's background and gather reviews from previous buyers. Look out for patterns in any complaints or issues.
• Seek Legal Advice: Consult with a legal expert before entering into any agreements, especially given the builder’s history.
• Understand Settlement Terms: Ensure that all agreements and settlements are clearly documented to avoid future disputes.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Check Credentials: Verify licenses, registrations, and any affiliations with industry associations.
2. Ask for References: Speak with previous customers to get their experiences and feedback.
3. Inspect Previous Work: If possible, visit completed projects to assess quality directly.
4. Evaluate Customer Service: Consider how responsive and transparent the builder is during initial conversations.

In conclusion, while SECTOR ONE ONE THREE GATEVIDA DEVELOPERS may offer opportunities, their legal history indicates potential risks that should be weighed carefully by prospective buyers. Always prioritize due diligence to ensure a beneficial and satisfactory home-buying experience.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder SECTOR ONE ONE THREE GATEVIDA DEVELOPERS Private Limited that resulted in losses reveals significant insights into the nature of its disputes and the underlying issues contributing to these outcomes.

The main theme emerging from these case summaries is the frequent reliance on settlement agreements. In the highlighted case, there was an amicable resolution, indicating that disputes may have been settled outside of formal court proceedings. This reliance on negotiated settlements suggests a potential pattern where the builder's litigation efforts stemmed from disputes viewed as resolvable through direct negotiation with counterparties.

The builder commonly brought cases to court likely contesting penalties related to project delays, as well as disagreements arising from their interpretation of settlement or completion agreements. The desire to clarify or contest the terms post-settlement appears to be a recurring theme, suggesting the builder may have been engaged in disputes over project timelines and responsibilities associated with contractual obligations.

However, the reasons for the builder’s loss in these cases often relate to insufficient evidence or clear documentation supporting their claims. The court's acceptance of the respondent's version of events, particularly when a signed settlement agreement was in place, highlights potential difficulties faced by the builder in substantiating their positions or claims in confrontational scenarios. Additionally, misunderstandings or ambiguous interpretations of the terms of agreements led to unfavorable outcomes, signaling a lack of clarity in contractual language that the builder must address moving forward.

In summation, while the builder may have sought to resolve disputes through litigation, patterns indicate a tendency towards losses resulting from inadequate evidence or a reliance on settled terms rather than robust legal frameworks. As such, potential buyers should exercise caution and ensure that they thoroughly understand the commitments made in agreements with builders like SECTOR ONE ONE THREE GATEVIDA DEVELOPERS to avoid similar pitfalls.