SEREN-53 INFRACON LLP

Introduction

When it comes to making significant investments in real estate, it is crucial to investigate the reputation and performance of builders. In this blog post, we will closely examine Seren-53 Infracon LLP, a builder operating in Gujarat. By analyzing their legal track record and complaints, we can draw valuable insights for potential homebuyers.

Overview of Legal Complaints

Seren-53 Infracon LLP has had 1 complaint filed against them, resulting in 1 lost case. This indicates that the builder has engaged in legal disputes, albeit limited in number. The consequences of these legal issues can provide prospective buyers with an understanding of the risks associated with this builder.

Legal Case Details

The sole case filed against Seren-53 Infracon LLP revolved around non-compliance with G.R.E.R.A. Circular No. 18. The appellant claimed that the builder failed to display the RERA registration number and website in a font size equal to or larger than the project contact details. The builder contended that the smaller font size was not intentional. Ultimately, the verdict found the builder guilty of non-compliance, leading to a penalty of Rs. 10,000. This underscores the importance of adhering to regulations set forth to protect consumers.

Patterns and Common Factors

Cases Lost

The loss of the single legal case highlights a concerning pattern. It suggests that there may be lapses in compliance with regulatory requirements, which could be indicative of a broader issue in operational practices. In this instance, the failure to meet regulatory standards can impact the credibility and trustworthiness of the builder.

Cases Won

Interestingly, Seren-53 Infracon LLP has not won any cases. The lack of successful defenses raises questions about the builder’s capacity to navigate legal challenges effectively. Their inability to win a case places them in a precarious position in the eyes of potential buyers.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Seren-53 Infracon LLP has a mixed and somewhat worrisome legal record. With only one complaint resulting in a lost case, it paints a picture of a builder that has struggled to maintain compliance with critical regulations aimed at consumer protection.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Due Diligence: Before making a purchase, conduct thorough research about the builder’s track record. Look for customer reviews and any other legal issues that may not be immediately apparent.
• Understand Regulations: Familiarize yourself with the local real estate regulations, like RERA guidelines, to ensure that the builder is compliant with all necessary requirements.
• Ask Questions: During your interactions with the builder, ask specific questions about their past legal disputes and how they handled them. This can reveal their level of transparency and accountability.

General Tips for Buyers

• Verify Credentials: Ensure that the builder is registered with relevant authorities and has the necessary licenses to operate.
• Visit Active Projects: Whenever possible, visit ongoing projects to observe the quality of work and site management.
• Consult with Experts: Engage real estate professionals or legal advisors who can guide you through the process and help make an informed decision.

In conclusion, while Seren-53 Infracon LLP operates within Gujarat, potential buyers should approach with caution, remaining vigilant in their research and assessment of the builder's history and practices.

Analysis of the cases filed against Seren-53 Infracon LLP, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around two main topics: regulatory compliance disputes and penalties for non-compliance.

The regulatory compliance disputes highlight the importance of adhering to established guidelines, particularly those set forth by the G.R.E.R.A. (Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority). In the case summarized, the builder was found guilty of non-compliance with G.R.E.R.A. Circular No. 18, which mandates the display of the RERA registration number and website address in a font size equal to or larger than the contact details of the proposed project. This indicates a pattern where builders may face legal challenges due to insufficient adherence to regulatory standards, which raises concerns about their operational integrity.

The penalties for non-compliance serve as a direct consequence of the aforementioned regulatory violations. In the identified case, the builder was ordered to pay a penalty of Rs. 10,000/-, demonstrating the legal system's effort to enforce compliance through financial repercussions. Common reasons for the builder’s litigation losses include unintentional or intentional non-compliance with regulatory requirements, resulting in legal claims primarily filed by customers or regulatory bodies seeking to impose penalties and ensure adherence to standards.

The underlying reasons for these disputes often center around the builder's failure to align their marketing materials and operational practices with the necessary regulations, leading to legal actions that could have been mitigated through diligent compliance. Thus, prospective buyers should take these cases into account when evaluating the credibility and reliability of builders, as a history of regulatory non-compliance may signify deeper operational issues.