SHAB INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the intricate world of real estate, selecting a reliable builder is paramount for ensuring a stress-free home-buying experience. Shab Infracon Private Limited, operating in Odisha, has garnered attention due to a modest number of complaints and legal proceedings. This blog post delves into the builder's performance based on the available legal case outcomes, complaints, and offers insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Legal Complaints

Shab Infracon Private Limited has been involved in a total of 7 complaints. Out of these, the outcomes indicate a mixed performance:

• Cases Won: 3
• Cases Lost: 4

Analysis of Lost Cases

Analyzing the three cases where Shab Infracon lost, we notice a significant pattern. All three cases were dismissed as withdrawn, suggesting that the complaints were potentially dropped by the appellants. This trend raises several questions:

• Common Factors: The lack of provided claims indicates a possible communication or understanding …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Shab Infracon Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised. The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: delayed possession claims, project delay disputes, and regulatory compliance issues.

The first theme, delayed possession claims, encompasses complaints primarily filed by buyers who faced extended waiting periods for their promised properties. While specific details of the claims were not provided, it is important to note that delays in possession are a common grievance in the real estate sector, often resulting from mismanagement, unforeseen circumstances, or inadequate planning by builders.

Project delay disputes constitute another significant theme, where buyers or associated parties disputed the builder's account of project timelines and the causes of delays. It is typical in such cases for plaintiffs to argue that builders failed to meet contractual obligations, while builders often counter that delays …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Shab Infracon Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily centered around three themes: Case Withdrawals, Claims Dismissed, and Lack of Substantiated Opposing Claims.

The cases categorized under 'Case Withdrawals' suggest that the opposing parties chose to retract their complaints, leading to cases being dismissed as withdrawn. While specific claims and responses from either side were not provided in the summaries, this withdrawal indicates that the opposing parties may have reconsidered their positions before substantive hearings.

This could stem from various reasons, such as a realization of insufficient evidence, disagreement over terms outside of court, or perhaps the emergence of new information that favored the builder's stance. The repeated occurrence of withdrawals also points towards a lack of merit in the claims raised against the builder, further surrounding these cases with patterns of buyers or regulatory …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis