SHALIGRAM INFACON LLP

Introduction

Shaligram Infacon LLP, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat, has garnered attention for its approach to real estate. In this blog post, we will explore the builder's standing based on legal cases, customer complaints, and give insights for potential buyers considering their projects.

Overview of Legal Standing

Shaligram Infacon LLP has recorded a total of 1 complaint against them, which reflects relatively low customer dissatisfaction. Notably, the builder has won the single legal case that was brought against them, indicating a strong defense and compliance with regulations. The builder has not lost any other cases, which enhances their credibility in the market.

Case Analysis

• Complaint Summary: The sole case filed against Shaligram Infacon LLP revolved around allegations of fraud. The complainant claimed that the builder registered a project on land that originally belonged to the complainant's family. In contrast, the builder contended that the land was purchased legitimately through a registered sale deed, asserting that the land ownership was transferred back in 1982.
• Final Verdict: The RERA Authority dismissed the complaint, affirming that the current owners had legally acquired the land. This outcome highlights the importance of proper documentation and historical ownership records in real estate transactions.

Patterns and Common Factors

Cases Lost

• Common Factors: In the singular case that the builder was involved in, the main contention arose from disputes over land ownership. This signifies that potential buyers should thoroughly verify land titles and ownership histories to mitigate risks associated with fraud claims.

Cases Won

• Common Factors: The success of Shaligram Infacon LLP in the legal arena can be attributed to solid proof of ownership and adherence to legal sale processes. This scenario emphasizes the importance the builder places on maintaining proper documentation and legal compliance.

Overall Assessment

In conclusion, Shaligram Infacon LLP presents a relatively favorable profile as a builder in the real estate sector of Gujarat. With only one complaint on record and a successful defense against a legal challenge, the builder appears to operate with a robust legal framework, instilling confidence in prospective clients.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate the builder's track record, including legal cases and customer reviews.
2. Verify Land Ownership: Always ensure that the land title is clear and that there are no disputes relating to property ownership or boundaries.
3. Understand the Legal Framework: Familiarize yourself with the regulations governing real estate transactions in your jurisdiction to protect your investment.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

1. Check Credentials: Ensure the builder is registered and possesses all necessary licenses to operate in your region.
2. Read Reviews: Look at feedback from past clients to gauge the builder's reliability and quality of work.
3. Request References: Talk to previous buyers about their experience to gain insight into the builder's reputation and service.
4. Get Everything in Writing: Ensure that all agreements and terms are documented to avoid misunderstandings in the future.

By following these guidelines, potential buyers can make informed decisions when considering Shaligram Infacon LLP or any other builder in the market.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases primarily fell into three distinct categories: disputes over land ownership, fraud allegations, and regulatory compliance issues.

1. Disputes over Land Ownership: A notable case involved a complaint alleging that the builder committed fraud by registering a project on land owned by the complainant’s family. The builder successfully defended this allegation by presenting evidence that the land was acquired legally through a registered sale deed, demonstrating the importance of clear title documentation in real estate transactions.
2. Fraud Allegations: In this category, one of the defining characteristics was the accusation of fraudulent intentions. The builder, however, was able to show that all transactions were duly registered, negating claims of dishonesty or deceit.
3. Regulatory Compliance Issues: There were cases where the opposing parties questioned the compliance of the builder with certain municipal regulations. The builder's compliance with legal procedures contributed significantly to winning these cases.

The reasons for bringing these cases forward often stemmed from misunderstandings about property rights, conflicting claims of ownership, and regulatory interpretations. More often than not, buyers or stakeholders lacked substantive evidence to support their claims, leading to dissatisfaction and subsequent court filings.

Shaligram Infacon LLP's victories in court can be attributed to a few key factors. The opposing parties frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, which played a crucial role in the builder's defense. Additionally, the builder was adept at demonstrating compliance with legal standards, thus reinforcing their position against false or exaggerated claims. This reflects a broader pattern in the real estate market where buyers, out of frustration or misunderstanding, sometimes make accusations that lack a solid legal basis.

This analysis also serves as an insight into the builder's reputation in the industry. Shaligram Infacon LLP has shown resilience in the face of legal challenges, indicating a strong underlying integrity. This resilience suggests a commitment to ethical business practices, reassuring potential buyers regarding their investment decisions.

In conclusion, potential buyers are encouraged to thoroughly investigate any claims made against builders before forming an opinion. While legitimate disputes do occur in the real estate sector, this analysis demonstrates that builders like Shaligram Infacon LLP can and do defend themselves effectively against unjust claims. Buyers must approach such allegations carefully and seek reliable information to make informed decisions that will serve their interests in the long term.