SHANTAKRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS

Introduction

In the construction and real estate industry, the reliability and integrity of a builder can significantly impact a buyer's experience. SHANTAKRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS, operating in Karnataka, presents an intriguing case study in this regard. This blog post delves into the builder's legal history, analyzing their performance based on complaints, cases won, and lost, to provide potential buyers with crucial insights.

Builder Overview

• Builder Name: SHANTAKRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS
• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1
• States with Projects: Karnataka

Legal Case Details

The builder has been involved in a notable legal case where they faced complaints regarding the delayed execution of a sale deed for a flat purchased by the complainant. The details of this case are as follows:

1. Appellant's Claim: The complainant sought compensation for delays in the execution of the sale deed.
2. Respondent's Claim: The builder asserted that they had completed the project and delivered possession to the complainant, citing technical reasons for the delay in executing the sale deed.
3. Final Verdict: Ultimately, the authority ruled in favor of the complainant, directing the builder to compensate for the delay and complete the execution of the sale deed.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Cases Lost

The case lost by SHANTAKRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS highlights a common issue often faced by builders: delays in project completion and documentation. The ruling against the builder indicates a lack of timely legal compliance, which can be detrimental to buyer trust and overall reputation. The fact that the builder lost this case suggests a potential inconsistency in their project management and customer service processes.

Cases Won

Interestingly, SHANTAKRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS has yet to win any legal battles. This points to a possible trend where the builder may struggle with addressing buyer complaints effectively, thus contributing to their legal challenges and stagnant reputation.

Conclusion

Evaluating SHANTAKRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS based on the available data reveals a concerning performance. The single complaint, coupled with their loss in the legal case, raises questions about their reliability and capacity to honor commitments.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Given the builder's current legal standings, buyers should conduct comprehensive research about past projects and customer reviews before making a commitment.
2. Consult Legal Experts: Engage with legal professionals who can provide insights into any potential risks of signing contracts with builders like SHANTAKRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS.
3. Seek Transparency: Ensure that the builder provides clear timelines and obligations within the contract concerning project completion and documentation.

General Tips When Selecting Any Builder

• Always check for complaints history and legal disputes.
• Look for testimonials or reviews from past customers to gauge satisfaction levels.
• Verify if the builder is registered with relevant regulatory bodies.
• Consider visiting previous projects to understand the quality of work firsthand.

Ultimately, while SHANTAKRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS has potential based on their operational footprint in Karnataka, potential buyers should exercise caution and due diligence before entering into any agreement.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shantakrishna Constructions that the builder lost reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around two main topics: delayed possession claims and disputes over documentation and sale deeds.

In the case of delayed possession claims, the complainant sought compensation for the delay in execution of the sale deed for a flat they purchased. The builder, Shantakrishna Constructions, responded that they had indeed completed the project and delivered possession, but faced technical issues that hindered the execution of the sale deed. The authority ruled in favor of the complainant, ordering the builder to pay delay compensation and fulfill their documentation obligations.

A common reason for litigation in these cases is the builder's failure to complete transactions as agreed upon in a timely manner. People bring cases to court primarily when they experience delays in getting their invested units delivered or when the builder fails to provide necessary sale deeds, which are critical for legal ownership and further transactions.

The builder’s losses in these cases highlight a pattern of insufficient adherence to regulatory and contractual obligations, particularly concerning timely delivery and proper documentation. In each case, the builder's defense revolved around the assertion of having completed the project, yet they consistently failed to address the complainants' core issues regarding sale deeds and compensation for delays. This indicates a systemic issue where builders may prioritize project completion over the obligations that come with it, such as ensuring proper documentation and customer satisfaction.

Overall, these rulings serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers considering properties developed by Shantakrishna Constructions. Buyers should be aware of these disputes, which reflect common triggers for litigation, and undertake thorough due diligence before making any purchase decisions.