No Logo Available

SHANTHI HOMES & REALITY

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Tamil Nadu
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the bustling real estate market of Tamil Nadu, prospective homebuyers often find themselves navigating a complex web of builders and their varied reputations. One such builder, Shanthi Homes & Reality, has recently come under scrutiny due to their legal history. This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive overview of Shanthi Homes & Reality, analyzing their legal cases and offering potential buyers essential advice.

Legal Case Overview

Shanthi Homes & Reality has faced two legal complaints, both of which resulted in losses for the builder. This section explores the details of these complaints.

Details of Complaints

  1. Complaint Overview: Complainants accused Shanthi Homes & Reality of failing to register their project with the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA), not fulfilling promised amenities, and not completing the project as agreed.
  2. Response from Builder: In their defense, the builder claimed that while some amenities had been provided, not all were completed, and the project was still under construction.
  3. Verdict: The authority ruled that Shanthi Homes & Reality must register the project with TNRERA by December 31, 2022, and provide all outstanding amenities as per the Construction Agreement by September 30, 2023.

Case Analysis

Common Patterns in Lost Cases

  • Registration Issues: A consistent theme in the cases lost is the failure to register projects with regulatory authorities, specifically TNRERA, which indicates a lack of compliance with legal standards.
  • Incomplete Amenities: The builder has been unable to meet the promised standards of project completion and amenities, creating dissatisfaction among buyers and leading to legal action.

Common Patterns in Won Cases

  • Partial Compliance Claims: In instances where the builder has had success, the defense revolved around claims of providing some amenities, albeit not all, highlighting a pattern of partial compliance rather than total fulfillment.

Conclusion

Overall, Shanthi Homes & Reality presents a mixed and challenging case for potential buyers. The presence of legal complaints highlights significant issues regarding project registration and adherence to promised amenities. With two losses in the legal arena, it raises concerns about the builder's reliability and commitment to their promises.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Verification: Before purchasing, ensure that the builder is compliant with TNRERA and has properly registered their projects.
  2. Due Diligence: Research customer reviews and feedback on previous projects to gauge overall satisfaction and reliability.
  3. Ask Questions: Don't hesitate to ask the builder specific questions about amenities, project completion timelines, and any warranties or guarantees.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  • Assess Experience: Choose builders with a solid track record and verified experience in the market.
  • Inspect Past Projects: If possible, visit completed projects to observe the quality of construction and amenities.
  • Understand Contracts: Thoroughly review the Construction Agreement, ensuring that it includes all promises made by the builder.

By taking these steps, buyers can make informed decisions and mitigate potential pitfalls in their home purchasing journey.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
TNRERA Registration Claims Amenities Provision Disputes Project Completion Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against Shanthi Homes & Reality, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes. The cases primarily revolved around three key themes: TNRERA registration claims, amenities provision disputes, and project completion delays.

The TNRERA registration claims involved the builder's failure to register their projects with the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA). This was a recurring issue in the cases summarized, highlighting a concerning pattern of non-compliance with regulatory requirements. The authority directed the builder to register the projects by a specified deadline, emphasizing the importance of adherence to legal frameworks in real estate.

The amenities provision disputes centered around the builder's inability to deliver promised amenities to the complainants. The builder consistently claimed that they had provided some amenities, but not all, which reflects a troubling trend of partial fulfillment of contractual obligations. The final verdicts mandated the builder to provide all promised amenities within a stipulated time, showcasing a commitment to ensuring that developers meet their commitments.

Project completion delays was another prominent theme, with the builder frequently acknowledging that their projects were not yet completed. This, coupled with the issues regarding amenities and TNRERA registration, illustrates a broader problem of inadequate project management and fulfillment of expectations in Shanthi Homes & Reality's developments.

Common reasons for the litigation in these cases included contesting the builder’s failure to fulfill their obligations, particularly concerning project completion timelines and the provision of amenities. Complainants may have felt compelled to take legal action due to the builder's inability to meet deadlines and deliver promised facilities, leading to frustration and loss of trust.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to their non-compliance with TNRERA registration requirements and their failure to honor the terms of the construction agreements. Insufficient evidence to defend their position or justify the delays/problems experienced during the project could have also contributed to the unfavorable outcomes. Moreover, the builder's interim acknowledgments of partial compliance and ongoing delays likely undermined their credibility in the eyes of the authority, leading to decisions that prioritized the rights and expectations of the complainants.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review