| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
Sharanam Developers is a builder operating in the state of Gujarat, known for their project 'Shrinand Heights Phase-II'. However, their track record raises some concerns for potential buyers, as indicated by the complaints filed against them. This blog delves into the specifics of the cases involving this builder and provides guidance for prospective homeowners.
Builder Overview
- Name: Sharanam Developers
- Location: Gujarat
- Number of Complaints: 2
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 2
Legal Case Details
Sharanam Developers has faced two legal cases which they ultimately lost. The primary issues in these cases revolve around the failure to deliver necessary documentation concerning property sales.
Summary of Legal Cases
Both cases brought against Sharanam Developers pertain to the same fundamental issue:
- Claim: Complainants bought flats in the 'Shrinand Heights Phase-II' project and fully paid for them, yet the developers did not provide the registered sale documents.
- Response: The builder claimed they were willing to provide the documents, but faced internal cooperation issues among their partners.
- Verdict: The court directed Sharanam Developers to provide the documents within 30 days at the cost of the complainants.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Cases Lost
- Common Factor: Both cases highlight a significant lack of adherence to contractual obligations, specifically concerning the issuance of registered sale documents. This failure not only reflects poorly on the builder's operational practices but also indicates potential instability in their internal processes.
- Impactful Issues: Internal partner disagreements, as indicated by the builder's response, suggest management challenges that could impede efficient project delivery or customer service.
Cases Won
Interestingly, Sharanam Developers has not won any cases, undermining their credibility and reliability in the eyes of potential clients. In legal disputes, a robust defense leading to victory is essential to building trust, which this builder has unfortunately not achieved.
Conclusion
Based on the provided data, Sharanam Developers may not be the most reliable choice for homebuyers, especially considering their track record of lost legal cases related to documentation. Potential buyers should proceed with caution, seeking thorough legal advice and conducting exhaustive due diligence before committing to any purchases.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Request Documentation Upfront: Always ask for necessary legal documents, like sale agreements and occupancy certificates, before making any payments.
- Conduct Background Checks: Investigate any builder's reputation and past legal disputes. Online reviews and local feedback can be invaluable.
- Negotiate Clear Terms: Ensure that contractual obligations are clearly stated and understood to avoid misunderstandings.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Research and Reviews: Look into customer feedback on various platforms to gauge the builder's trustworthiness and project quality.
- Check Licenses and Registrations: Verifying a builder’s credentials is crucial to ensuring their legitimacy.
- Assess Financial Stability: A builder with a strong financial background is less likely to default on projects.
While Sharanam Developers offers an enticing project with 'Shrinand Heights Phase-II', potential buyers must approach with vigilance and an informed strategy. Doing so can lead to a satisfactory home buying experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Sharanam Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes. The primary theme across the cases is the builder's failure to provide registered sale documents to the complainants after full payment had been made for flats in the 'Shrinand Heights Phase-II' project.
The reasons people commonly brought cases to court in this instance were rooted in the importance of securing legal ownership through registered sale documents. The complainants trusted that paying the full amount for their flats would result in the timely provision of this critical documentation, and the builder's failure to deliver led to legal action.
A pattern emerges from these summaries: the common trigger for the builder's litigation was the inability or unwillingness of the partners, Phulabhai Bhikhabhai and Jitendra Phulabhai, to cooperate in finalizing and distributing the necessary sale documents. This suggests a significant internal operational issue that impacted the builder’s ability to fulfill contractual obligations.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their failure to comply with the contractual requirement of providing registered sale documents within a reasonable timeframe. The legal system recognized the complainants' entitlement to these documents, and the builder's defense—that they were willing to provide the documents but were hindered by their partners—did not sufficiently meet the obligations owed to the complainants. Consequently, the builder was directed to provide the documents within a specified timeframe, emphasizing the legal expectation that contractors will adhere to their commitments.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/A/Offline/Ahmed… | Gujarat | The complainants purchased a flat in the 'Shrinan… | ["Registered sale d… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claim that … | Ilaben Hemantbhai M… | Samawala Sharanam D… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1WuAPVSAdCTeEHmGpQBH7ZIlGCSvt9ifn |