SHEETAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In today’s competitive real estate market, selecting the right builder is crucial for a smooth home-buying experience. One such builder operating in Gujarat is SHEETAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED. While they have a small number of recorded complaints, it's essential to delve into their performance and legal standings to make an informed decision.

Overview of SHEETAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

SHEETAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED has faced a total of 2 complaints, with a moderate outcome where they have won 1 case and lost 1 case. The absence of a large number of complaints suggests a relatively stable operation, yet the details of the few cases provide insight into their practices and customer interactions.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Lost

1. Case Description: The Secretary of Gujrera, representing Gujarat RERA, filed a complaint. The claim involved seeking to withdraw complaints as the projects were completed, and compliance was filed and …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Sheetal Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around three common topics: delayed possession claims, payment disputes, and the registration of conveyance deeds.

Many of the complaints made by the customers of Sheetal Infrastructure highlight significant delays in the possession of properties. Customers often sought registration of the conveyance deed and possession of their flats, demonstrating a prevalent concern in the fulfillment of contractual obligations regarding timely delivery of completed units.

Payment disputes constitute another major theme in these cases. The builder frequently claimed that delays were attributable to customers failing to pay the full amount due, indicating a systemic issue where the builder may not have clearly communicated payment requirements or timelines. This defensive strategy suggests that the builder sought to shift the blame for delays from its operational inefficiencies to the financial …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SHEETAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following information. Upon examination, it is clear that the primary disputes that arose against the builder predominantly fall under the theme of 'Project Completion and Compliance.' These cases often involved allegations regarding the timely completion of projects and adherence to regulatory requirements set forth by authorities such as the Gujarat RERA. In this particular case, the Secretary of Gujarat RERA sought to withdraw complaints pertaining to completed projects, as compliance was satisfactorily demonstrated.

The reasons for these cases being brought to court can include contesting penalties for supposed delays, claims associated with unfinished projects, or assertions regarding non-compliance with municipal orders. It is important to note that disputes over the satisfactory completion of a project often arise from misunderstandings or misinformation circulated among buyers or local regulatory bodies.

…

Unlock Full Report & Analysis