SHELTREX KARJAT PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 2
- States (Active in): Maharashtra
| CIN | U55100MH1986PTC040749 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 28-Aug-86 |
| Address | Tanaji Malushree City Site Shirse-Akurle, Karjat(West) Karjat Raigarh MH 410201 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
Sheltrex Karjat Private Limited is a builder operating in the bustling state of Maharashtra, known for its active participation in real estate projects. However, the builder has recently garnered attention due to its legal challenges. This blog delves into the complaint history of Sheltrex Karjat Private Limited, examining both the losses and wins in legal cases to give potential buyers an informed perspective.
Overview of Legal Complaints
The builder has faced two complaints to date, and notably, it has lost both of these cases. This presents an immediate red flag for potential investors, as a track record of losses in legal disputes can indicate potential issues with project delivery or adherence to contractual obligations.
Legal Case Summaries
- First Case:
- Status: Dismissed
- Details: The appeal was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the parties involved. This indicates a possible lack of engagement or resolution efforts from both sides. - Second Case:
- Status: Allowed
- Details: The applicant claimed a delay in filing the appeal due to unforeseen circumstances like lockdowns. Though the tribunal condoned the delay, it highlights the complications that can arise in legal matters involving the builder, especially when external factors affect proceedings.
Analysis of Legal Performance
Cases Lost:
- Common Factors:
- Absenteeism in Court: The denial of one case was attributed to a chronic absence from hearings, reflecting poorly on the builder's commitment to resolving the disputes.
- Unsettled Claims: The other claim exemplified challenges in maintaining timely communication and legal processes, affecting the overall handling of legal matters.
Cases Won:
- Common Factors:
- Delay Acknowledgment: In the second case, the tribunal was understanding of delays caused by external circumstances, which may suggest a level of judicial sympathy rather than a strong defense from the builder.
- Failure of the Opposing Party to Engage: The lack of a response from the respondent in the second case may also have contributed to a favorable outcome for Sheltrex, albeit under less than ideal circumstances.
Conclusion
In sum, Sheltrex Karjat Private Limited presents a concerning legal profile for potential homebuyers. With a record of two lost cases and no favorable resolutions, buyers should tread cautiously. Here are some essential tips for those considering investment in properties managed by this builder:
Tips for Potential Buyers:
- Conduct Thorough Research: Always investigate a builder's legal history before making any purchase decision. This includes reading reviews and seeking testimonials from past clients.
- Verify Project Status: Ensure that the project's timeline is clear, and obtain updates directly from the builder or through official channels.
- Consult Legal Professionals: Engage with real estate lawyers to understand the implications of any existing legal disputes that might affect your investment.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder:
- Check Credentials: Ensure the builder holds all necessary licenses and has good standing in the professional community.
- Review Project Specifications: Look for detailed descriptions of what is included in the purchase to avoid future disputes.
- Assess Financial Stability: A financially stable builder is less likely to encounter delays in project completion.
By keeping these tips in mind, buyers can make more informed decisions and safeguard their investments in today’s complex real estate landscape.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Sheltrex Karjat Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases highlight ongoing issues primarily revolving around delays and the builder's participation in legal proceedings.
Common themes in the disputes include delays in filing appeals and unforeseen circumstances affecting the builder's ability to meet deadlines. In one case, the applicant sought condonation of delay due to circumstances such as a lockdown, which demonstrates an emerging pattern of cases influenced by external factors beyond the builder's control. In contrast, another case was dismissed due to the builder's continuous absence from proceedings, highlighting a troubling trend where the builder failed to participate in their own defense.
The reasons people brought cases to court vary; however, a prevalent motivation was to address delays attributed to the builder's actions or inactions. Disputes often revolved around the builder's failure to file appeals on time, resulting in additional legal complications. This points to a significant area of concern, as timely filings are crucial in real estate litigation to avoid further penalties or dismissals.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient participation and a lack of timely action. In one instance, the builder failed to provide evidence of valid reasons for their delay until late in the process, while in another case, they were absent entirely, leading to a dismissal without consideration of the merits. These outcomes suggest systemic issues within the builder's operations, including possible mismanagement or misunderstanding of legal requirements and timelines.
Overall, this analysis underlines the importance for potential buyers to consider these legal challenges when contemplating a purchase from Sheltrex Karjat Private Limited. Buyers should be aware of the common delays, the builder’s track record in litigation, and the potential for insufficient accountability in their operations. Making informed decisions in real estate requires careful consideration of these factors to mitigate risk.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT006000000052511 | Maharashtra | The applicant sought condonation of delay in fili… | ["Delay condonation… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Venkat G. Sonkawade | Sheltrex Karjat Pri… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1xxCBFg5b5UX0_u4HCpi8k6Xs3eFNRgwa |