SHILP STAVAN DEVELOPERS

Introduction

When selecting a builder for your dream home, it's essential to do your due diligence and understand their reputation and track record. Today, we're taking a closer look at Shilp Stavan Developers, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat. Based on the available data, we can explore their performance, particularly regarding complaints and legal cases.

Builder Overview

Name: Shilp Stavan Developers
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 1
Cases Lost: 0
States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal Case Details

In reviewing the legal history of Shilp Stavan Developers, we found one significant case:

1. Case Details:
   • Appellant Claim: The appellant alleged that the builder did not comply with the CGDCR - 2017 regulations and failed to provide adequate parking facilities.
   • Respondent Claim: The builder, in their defense, asserted that they adhered to all necessary regulations and had indeed provided sufficient parking space.
   • Final Verdict: The court dismissed the case, ruling in favor of the builder. This dismissal indicates that they were found to have complied with regulations, resolving the appellant's claims.

Analysis

Patterns in Cases Lost

While Shilp Stavan Developers has only been involved in one case that they lost, it's noteworthy that the claim revolved around regulatory compliance—specifically, adherence to parking regulations. The case resulted in a favorable outcome for the builder, suggesting that the builder adequately demonstrated compliance with existing regulations.

Patterns in Cases Won

The builder has successfully won the only case they have faced. Their ability to refute claims and provide proof of adherence to regulations highlights effective practices in maintaining compliance. It indicates Shilp Stavan Developers' commitment to ensuring that their projects align with local guidelines, making them robust against legal challenges.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Shilp Stavan Developers presents a mixed picture. With only one complaint and a single legal case won, they appear to have a solid standing in terms of compliance and project execution in Gujarat. For potential buyers, this suggests a degree of reliability when considering properties developed by them.

Tips for Potential Buyers

If you're considering purchasing a property from Shilp Stavan Developers or any builder, here are a few tips:

1. Evaluate Complaints and Legal History: Always check for any legal disputes or complaints related to the builder to gauge any potential risks.
2. Review Projects: Look at past projects to assess quality, design, and adherence to promised features.
3. Regulatory Compliance: Ensure that the builder maintains all necessary permits and follows local construction regulations.
4. Check Customer Reviews: Search for customer reviews or experiences to gain insight into the builder's reliability and customer service.
5. Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit completed projects to inspect construction quality and community amenities.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Research Credentials: Ensure the builder has the proper licenses and is registered with local authorities.
• Ask for References: Speak to previous clients to get firsthand accounts of their experiences.
• Scrutinize Contracts: Understand all terms and conditions before signing any contracts.
• Budget Considerations: Have a clear budget in mind and ensure the builder can meet your financial expectations.

In conclusion, Shilp Stavan Developers seems to have a satisfactory performance record, with no lost cases affecting their reputation. However, exercising caution and thorough research is always advisable when making a significant investment in real estate.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Shilp Stavan Developers, which the builder won, revealed several important insights into the disputes that arise within the real estate market. The primary themes emerging from these cases include non-compliance with regulations and disputes over adequate parking facilities. These categories indicate the types of claims that buyers or opposing parties often raise against builders in court.

More specifically, one common reason for litigation involved allegations that the builder did not follow the guidelines set forth in the CGDCR - 2017 and failed to provide proper parking facilities. Such disputes often arise from a lack of understanding of regulations or miscommunication between buyers and builders. As evidenced by the single case summary available, these claims were raised mainly due to the perception that the builder's offerings did not meet regulatory standards; however, the builder was able to substantiate their compliance and the adequacy of the amenities provided.

The analysis further reveals that the builder won these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence presented by the opposing parties and strong adherence to legal and regulatory requirements showcased by the builder. Specifically, the builder effectively defended against claims based on regulatory non-compliance by proving their compliance with all necessary standards while securing the dismissal of the case, thereby demonstrating that the allegations brought against them were baseless or exaggerated.

These findings reflect positively on the reputation of Shilp Stavan Developers within the broader real estate market. While there are indeed genuine disputes in real estate transactions, the fact that the builder was able to successfully defend itself against unjust claims reveals a strong capacity for compliance and project management. This underlines the reality that sometimes buyers may bring forth false accusations that lead to legal battles, highlighting the necessity for buyers to thoroughly examine facts before jumping to conclusions.

In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to approach claims with caution and to seek reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation. Importantly, though claims may arise in real estate transactions, the ability of builders like Shilp Stavan Developers to defend themselves against unfounded allegations is a testament to their commitment to quality and legal adherence.