SHILPI REALITIES PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the world of real estate, trusting the right builder is crucial for a satisfactory purchasing experience. SHILPI REALITIES PRIVATE Limited, operating primarily in Madhya Pradesh, presents a case that merges both commendable ambitions and substantial legal challenges. This blog aims to review the builder's track record and provide critical insights for potential buyers.

Legal Challenges Faced by SHILPI REALITIES PRIVATE Limited

Complaints Overview

SHILPI REALITIES PRIVATE Limited has encountered 106 complaints, resulting in 10 cases won and 96 cases lost. This alarming statistic raises questions about the company's operational integrity and reliability. Let’s dive deeper into the common patterns observed in their legal history.

Cases Lost: Identifying Patterns

Upon reviewing the 10 cases that SHILPI REALITIES lost, several common factors emerge:

• Lack of Transaction Evidence: Majority of the cases involved claims that the builder did not purchase plots despite agreements or payments being made. …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Shilpi Realities Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common disputes faced by the builder. The cases primarily revolved around four key themes: incomplete development works, insufficient water and sewage facilities, damaged infrastructure and boundary issues, and the need for priority completion of remaining works.

The majority of the cases highlighted the incomplete development works in the project, which consistently featured shortcomings such as inadequate electrification, unfinished roads, insufficient water supply, the absence of a sewage treatment plant, and a damaged boundary wall. This suggests that the builder faced considerable challenges in fulfilling their commitments to potential homeowners, which led to multiple legal disputes.

The reason people commonly brought cases to court was to address these glaring deficiencies and to push the builder to complete the necessary development works. Homebuyers were not only expecting proper housing conditions but also requisite …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes primarily revolve around claims that Shilpi Realities Pvt. Ltd. had not purchased plots despite allegations from various applicants indicating that they had sold plots to the builder. These cases are grouped under 'Claims of Non-Purchase of Plots,' highlighting a pattern where buyers assert that transactions occurred, yet the builder counters that no such transactions took place. Additionally, these disputes often lack substantial evidence, falling into the category of 'Lack of Evidence of Transactions.' This theme is prevalent in several cases, where the M.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority dismissed claims due to insufficient proof of sales or contractual agreements. Moreover, some cases involved disagreements over whether a contract existed between the parties, leading to further disputes categorized under 'Disagreement over Contracts.' The authorities often found a lack of contractual relationship, resulting in …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis