| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, understanding the history and reliability of a builder is paramount for prospective homebuyers. SHIV DEVELOPER, with projects primarily in Gujarat and Odisha, presents a mixed picture when analyzed through the lens of legal cases and customer complaints. This blog post will delve into SHIV DEVELOPER's legal history, the outcome of cases they faced, and offer guidance for potential buyers.
Overview of SHIV DEVELOPER
With 14 complaints registered against them, SHIV DEVELOPER has faced legal scrutiny. Out of these cases, they have won only 3 and lost 11, indicating challenges in their project compliance and customer satisfaction. This high ratio of lost cases raises some concerns that potential buyers should consider carefully.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost by SHIV DEVELOPER
- Regulatory Non-compliance: Many of the cases lost involved allegations of failing to comply with regulatory requirements. For instance, SHIV DEVELOPER was found …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Shiv Developer, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three recurring themes: Non-Compliance with RERA Act, Failure to Submit Mandatory Reports, and Penalties for Project Delays and Violations.
The first theme, Non-Compliance with RERA Act, encompasses a substantial number of cases where Shiv Developer was penalized for violating various provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act. Common reasons for the penalties included failing to submit final reports on projects, not adhering to the timelines for annual audit reports, and other regulatory breaches. This pattern suggests a troubling trend where the builder has occasionally disregarded legal obligations related to transparency and accountability in real estate projects.
The second theme, Failure to Submit Mandatory Reports, highlights cases specifically centered around Shiv Developer's inability or unwillingness to furnish required documentation, such …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SHIV DEVELOPER, which it lost revealed several common themes and patterns.
First, the cases can be broadly grouped into three main categories based on the recurring themes identified. The first category is Regulatory Non-compliance, where the builder faced issues related to adherence to legal and regulatory protocols. The builder's claims often focused on external factors affecting their compliance; however, the respondents consistently pointed out a failure on the part of the builder to meet these requirements.
The second category, Penalties for Late Submission, reflects the circumstances where the builder faced penalties for not submitting final accounts and compliance reports on time. In these cases, the builder attributed the delays to a mixture of technical issues and resource limitations but struggled to provide convincing evidence supporting these claims.
Lastly, the Failure to Submit Financial Reports category succinctly highlights the builder's challenges …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SHIV DEVELOPER, which it won, revealed the following information.
The cases primarily revolve around two key themes: disputes over completion certificates and the timeliness of regulatory submissions.
In these proceedings, SHIV DEVELOPER consistently maintained that they had submitted necessary documentation, including the final completion certificate and society registration, in a timely manner.
Conversely, the authority contested these claims, citing delays in the completion certificate's submission as a central issue.
The common reasons for these cases coming to court stem from SHIV DEVELOPER's efforts to contest perceived penalties and to negotiate regulatory compliance issues.
Another trigger for litigation appears to be disagreements over documentation timelines, which often lead to disputes about the associated penalties or legal consequences.
These patterns suggest a proactive approach by the builder, perhaps indicative of a need to safeguard their reputation and ensure project delivery is not unduly …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SHIV DEVELOPER, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily fell under three key themes: Regulatory Compliance, Project Completion Disputes, and Penalties for Non-compliance.
- Regulatory Compliance: One critical concern raised involved allegations that SHIV DEVELOPER did not submit quarterly reports as mandated by the RERA Act. In this instance, the authority concluded that the builder had indeed completed the project on time and provided necessary documentation such as the utilization certificate. This outcome highlights the builder's adherence to regulatory frameworks, which is a positive indicator of their operational integrity.
- Project Completion Disputes: At the heart of some complaints were claims regarding delays in project completion. However, the builder successfully defended itself by producing evidence of timely project completions, thereby reinforcing their reliability in managing timelines.
- Penalties for Non-compliance: Another case, although …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!