Analysis of the cases filed against Shiv Developer, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three recurring themes: Non-Compliance with RERA Act, Failure to Submit Mandatory Reports, and Penalties for Project Delays and Violations.

The first theme, Non-Compliance with RERA Act, encompasses a substantial number of cases where Shiv Developer was penalized for violating various provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act. Common reasons for the penalties included failing to submit final reports on projects, not adhering to the timelines for annual audit reports, and other regulatory breaches. This pattern suggests a troubling trend where the builder has occasionally disregarded legal obligations related to transparency and accountability in real estate projects.

The second theme, Failure to Submit Mandatory Reports, highlights cases specifically centered around Shiv Developer's inability or unwillingness to furnish required documentation, such as annual audit reports and project status reports (QPRs). The builder's defense often revolved around claims of non-applicability or inability to meet deadlines, which ultimately did not stand in court. This theme underscores an important issue in the real estate sector where maintaining proper records and complying with reporting requirements is crucial for ensuring that projects progress as planned and that buyers are informed.

The third theme, Penalties for Project Delays and Violations, broadly covers the various penalties imposed on Shiv Developer for delays in project completions and other violations that did not fit into the first two categories. While some cases lacked specifics, the consistent imposition of penalties indicates a systemic issue within the builder's operations, possibly related to project management or resource allocation.

A common thread among these themes is the builder's recurrent losses due to insufficient adherence to the RERA Act and other regulatory standards. The reasons for these losses typically include:

• Insufficient Evidence: In many cases, Shiv Developer failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claims or defend against penalties.
• Non-Compliance: As discussed, the builder's repeated violations of the RERA Act resulted in numerous penalties, indicating a significant compliance issue.
• Misunderstandings of Regulations: Claims made by the builder, such as not being required to submit QPRs, highlight a lack of understanding or willful disregard of regulatory requirements, which ultimately led to legal consequences.

In conclusion, the analysis of these cases raises important red flags for potential buyers considering projects by Shiv Developer. Buyers should remain vigilant, thoroughly check the builder's legal standing, and ensure compliance with RERA and other regulations before making any investment.

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SHIV DEVELOPER, which it lost revealed several common themes and patterns.

First, the cases can be broadly grouped into three main categories based on the recurring themes identified. The first category is Regulatory Non-compliance, where the builder faced issues related to adherence to legal and regulatory protocols. The builder's claims often focused on external factors affecting their compliance; however, the respondents consistently pointed out a failure on the part of the builder to meet these requirements.

The second category, Penalties for Late Submission, reflects the circumstances where the builder faced penalties for not submitting final accounts and compliance reports on time. In these cases, the builder attributed the delays to a mixture of technical issues and resource limitations but struggled to provide convincing evidence supporting these claims.

Lastly, the Failure to Submit Financial Reports category succinctly highlights the builder's challenges in meeting necessary deadlines and reports, further aggravating their legal situation.

A closer look at why SHIV DEVELOPER commonly brought cases to court reveals patterns related to disputing penalties and project timelines. The builder often contended that their ability to fulfill obligations was hindered by factors beyond their control. However, these claims were often met with skepticism, as regulatory bodies emphasized accountability and compliance.

Common reasons for the builder's losses included inadequate evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with established legal or regulatory requirements, and a lack of proactive effort in adhering to interim directions issued by authorities. Additionally, misunderstandings or misinterpretations regarding land or project classification rules often left the builder vulnerable in these legal disputes.

In summary, while SHIV DEVELOPER aimed to contest penalties and project delays, the prevailing issues of regulatory non-compliance and inadequate documentation consistently undermined their cases in court.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SHIV DEVELOPER, which it won, revealed the following information.

The cases primarily revolve around two key themes: disputes over completion certificates and the timeliness of regulatory submissions.

In these proceedings, SHIV DEVELOPER consistently maintained that they had submitted necessary documentation, including the final completion certificate and society registration, in a timely manner.

Conversely, the authority contested these claims, citing delays in the completion certificate's submission as a central issue.

The common reasons for these cases coming to court stem from SHIV DEVELOPER's efforts to contest perceived penalties and to negotiate regulatory compliance issues.

Another trigger for litigation appears to be disagreements over documentation timelines, which often lead to disputes about the associated penalties or legal consequences.

These patterns suggest a proactive approach by the builder, perhaps indicative of a need to safeguard their reputation and ensure project delivery is not unduly complicated by bureaucratic issues.

In terms of winning these cases, SHIV DEVELOPER benefited from the authority's failure to present sufficient evidence against their claims.

There were noticeable instances of non-compliance with regulatory requirements from the opposing parties, and misunderstandings about submission timelines contributed to favorable verdicts for the builder.

Thus, it is evident that SHIV DEVELOPER was able to effectively defend itself against allegations that could have adversely affected their reputation and business operations.

This analysis suggests a broader context within the real estate market, emphasizing that legal battles can arise from misunderstandings or false accusations directed towards builders.

The ability of SHIV DEVELOPER to successfully navigate these challenges signifies a robust internal compliance structure and a commitment to adhering to regulatory frameworks.

It also highlights that potential buyers must exercise caution; sometimes builders face exaggerated claims from buyers or other entities that may not fully understand the regulatory landscape.

In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to make informed decisions when considering real estate investments.

While disputes in the real estate realm are not uncommon, the presented cases demonstrate that builders like SHIV DEVELOPER can withstand unjust allegations.

Buyers should carefully approach claims against builders, seek reliable information, and weigh the facts before forming opinions on a builder's reputation.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SHIV DEVELOPER, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily fell under three key themes: Regulatory Compliance, Project Completion Disputes, and Penalties for Non-compliance.

1. Regulatory Compliance: One critical concern raised involved allegations that SHIV DEVELOPER did not submit quarterly reports as mandated by the RERA Act. In this instance, the authority concluded that the builder had indeed completed the project on time and provided necessary documentation such as the utilization certificate. This outcome highlights the builder's adherence to regulatory frameworks, which is a positive indicator of their operational integrity.
2. Project Completion Disputes: At the heart of some complaints were claims regarding delays in project completion. However, the builder successfully defended itself by producing evidence of timely project completions, thereby reinforcing their reliability in managing timelines.
3. Penalties for Non-compliance: Another case, although resulting in penalties for non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, shows a reactive legal environment where builders could face repercussions for minor infractions while still maintaining a track record of overall project success.

The claims that led to these cases stemmed from buyers and regulatory bodies challenging compliance with legal stipulations and contesting perceived delays or mismanagement. A recurring pattern in the complaints appears to involve misunderstandings of the builder's procedural adherence or exaggerated interpretations of delays in the project timelines.

SHIV DEVELOPER typically emerged victorious in these cases due to a combination of factors, including the lack of sufficient evidence from appellants and showcasing their compliance with required legal and regulatory standards. The builder effectively countered claims that were sometimes rooted in misunderstandings or misrepresented situations.

This analysis indicates a robust reputation for SHIV DEVELOPER within the broader real estate market. It is crucial to recognize that while there are legitimate disputes in the real estate sector, buyers occasionally file false complaints that can lead to unnecessary legal challenges. The builder's ability to defend against unjust claims speaks volumes about their operational standards and dedication to fulfilling commitments.

To potential buyers, it is essential to make informed decisions. While not all claims are baseless, it is always prudent to approach allegations and accusations judiciously. This analysis illustrates that builders like SHIV DEVELOPER can successfully defend themselves against wrongful accusations, underscoring the importance of thorough research and reliable information before forming opinions about a builder’s reputation.