SHIV GANESH CORPORATION

Overview of Shiv Ganesh Corporation
Shiv Ganesh Corporation is a builder operating exclusively in the state of Gujarat. With a track record that includes one complaint, this company exhibits a notable ability to navigate challenges, having won all legal cases brought against them. This post delves into their legal performance and offers insights for potential buyers.

Legal Cases Overview
Cases Won
Shiv Ganesh Corporation has a clean slate in legal matters, with one case filed against them where they were the appellant. The case revolved around the submission of quarterly reports. The appellant claimed they had submitted the reports on time, while the respondent contended they had not received these documents. Ultimately, the authority found that the appellant had failed to submit the reports as claimed, leading to a fine imposed on them.

Summary of Legal Case:
- Appellant's Claim: The appellant alleged timely submission of quarterly reports.
- Respondent's Claim: The respondent claimed to have not received any reports at all.
- Verdict: The authority sided with the respondent, concluding that the appellant had indeed not submitted the reports, resulting in a fine of Rs. 25,000.

Analysis of Legal Performance
Patterns in Cases Lost:
- With Shiv Ganesh Corporation having only one case that resulted in a loss, there isn't a substantial pattern to derive. However, the case indicates a potential oversight in documentation and submission protocols.

Patterns in Cases Won:
- The builder demonstrated a strong capability to contest and resolve claims successfully. Their ability to present compelling evidence may suggest effective administrative practices and a clear understanding of procedural requirements.

Conclusion
Based on the provided data, Shiv Ganesh Corporation appears to be a competent builder with a solid performance record in legal cases. While they have faced a complaint, their history of winning cases reflects their credibility and operational integrity.

Tips for Potential Buyers
1. Understand the Builder's Reputation: Given Shiv Ganesh Corporation's historical success in legal matters, potential buyers can feel more confident in their capabilities.
2. Documentation Review: Always ensure that all contracts and documents are thoroughly reviewed. This aligns with the lessons learned from the builder's recent case involving submission failures.
3. Engagement in Communication: Maintain open lines of communication with the builder to mitigate any potential issues that could arise.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Conduct Thorough Research: Always research the builder's background, past projects, and any legal history to gauge their reliability.
- Seek Reviews and Referrals: Look into previous customers' experiences to better understand the builder's service quality.
- Check Licenses and Insurance: Ensure that the builder holds all necessary licenses and insurances to protect your investment.
- Be Clear on Terms: Before signing a contract, clarify all terms, including payment schedules, associated costs, and timelines to prevent future disputes.

By following these guidelines, buyers can make informed decisions and ensure a smoother experience when engaging with builders.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shiv Ganesh Corporation, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolve around two common themes: Penalties and Compliance Disputes, as well as Disputes over Documentation and Reporting.

Within the realm of Penalties and Compliance Disputes, the builder contested fines that were imposed by authorities, arguing that the penalties were unjust and stemmed from misunderstandings or miscommunications rather than actual non-compliance. For example, in the case summary provided, the builder faced a penalty for not submitting quarterly reports on time, a claim they disputed vigorously since the authority concluded that the reports were indeed never submitted.

On the other hand, the Disputes over Documentation and Reporting theme highlighted conflicts that arose over the reliability and timely receipt of claimed documentation from the builder, leading to court cases where the builder sought to clarify its compliance status.

The overarching reasons for these legal battles appear to be a mix of contesting penalties, disputing project delays attributed to external reasons, and disagreements over the classification of land or project compliance. A distinct pattern is evident: the builder often found itself in litigation due to claims made by the opposing parties which were not substantiated by sufficient evidence.

In terms of the successes enjoyed by Shiv Ganesh Corporation in these cases, they have frequently benefitted from the lack of adequate proof provided by the other parties, revealing their inability to properly substantiate claims of non-compliance or delays. The builder's strong position was reinforced by demonstrating that the opposing parties failed to fulfill legal or regulatory requirements—often leading to the conclusion that they were making exaggerated claims against the builder.

This analysis suggests that Shiv Ganesh Corporation maintains a solid reputation in the market as a builder that effectively defends itself against unjust accusations. It's important to note that false or exaggerated claims can arise in the real estate industry, and many times, builders find themselves in a legal battle due to misunderstandings or intentional misrepresentations by buyers and other involved parties.

For potential buyers, this serves as a reminder of the importance of making well-informed decisions in the real estate market. While there are certainly legitimate grievances that arise, the propensity for customers to bring forth claims that may lack substantial backing is significant. The case analyses demonstrate that builders such as Shiv Ganesh Corporation can often prevail in court, especially when claims are not founded on solid evidence. With this in mind, buyers should tread cautiously and conduct thorough research before drawing conclusions about a builder's reliability or overall reputation.