SHIV LITHOPACK WORKS P. LIMITED

Introduction

When investing in real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a successful project. In this post, we focus on Shiv Lithopack Works P. Limited, a builder based in Maharashtra. With limited legal disputes and a singular complaint recorded against them, potential buyers may wonder about the credibility and reliability of this builder.

Builder Overview

Shiv Lithopack Works P. Limited is a construction firm that primarily operates in the state of Maharashtra. The company has garnered attention due to one recorded legal complaint, raising questions about its track record in the industry.

Legal Case Summary

Shiv Lithopack Works P. Limited has faced one legal case that it ultimately lost. Here’s a detailed summary of the situation:

• Case Summary: The appellant sought exemption from compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act of 2016. The respondent (in this context, likely a regulatory body or a client) contended that compliance with this section was essential to entertain the appeal.
• Verdict: The court ruled against Shiv Lithopack Works and demanded that the appellant deposit the full amount to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act. Failure to do so would lead to the dismissal of the appeal.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Patterns in Cases Lost:

The sole case Shiv Lithopack Works has lost indicates a potential pattern of non-compliance with legal requirements. The specific nature of the claim suggests that the builder may have challenges adhering to regulatory frameworks, pointing to a need for improved attention to legal obligations.

Cases Won:

Notably, Shiv Lithopack Works has not won any cases, with the single case resulting in a loss. This could reflect a broader trend affecting their operational practices, indicating a lack of successful legal strategies or simply an infrequent reliance on litigation.

Conclusion

Overall, Shiv Lithopack Works P. Limited presents a somewhat concerning track record based on the provided data. With one documented complaint and an unsuccessful legal history, potential buyers should approach with caution.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Do Your Research: Review any available feedback from current or previous clients of Shiv Lithopack Works P. Limited before making a decision.
2. Legal Consultation: Consulting with a legal professional can provide clarity on any documents or contracts involved.
3. Ask About Compliance: Inquire directly about their adherence to local regulations and any incidents of legal disputes to gauge their operational integrity.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Evaluate Their Reputation: Look for reviews, testimonials, and any past legal issues that might affect your investment.
2. Check Credentials: Ensure that the builder is appropriately licensed and insured, operating within all legal frameworks.
3. Request a Portfolio: A reliable builder should have a portfolio showcasing their completed projects. This helps assess their quality of work.
4. Understand the Terms: Always read the terms of any agreement carefully, especially in regard to timelines, costs, and recourse in the event of disputes.

In summary, while Shiv Lithopack Works P. Limited operates in Maharashtra and has a minimal complaint history, their record requires careful consideration. By keeping these tips in mind, buyers can ensure a more informed decision when selecting a builder.

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Shiv Lithopack Works P. Limited, which it lost, reveals some intriguing insights regarding key disputes and areas of concern for this builder. The cases can primarily be grouped into a few common themes, namely Regulatory Compliance Issues, Appeals and Exemptions, and Legal Obligations in Real Estate.

One prevalent theme is Regulatory Compliance Issues, where the builder often sought exemptions from adherence to specific sections of laws, such as Section 43(5) of the Act of 2016. This theme underscores the significance of understanding legal requirements in real estate development. In the highlighted case, the builder's appeal was dismissed because they failed to comply with mandatory legal protocols.

Another common theme is Appeals and Exemptions. The builder frequently appealed for exemptions but was met with resistance from respondents who asserted that compliance is crucial before entertaining such appeals. This suggests a pattern where the builder's strategic decisions to contest certain regulatory requirements may have led to adverse outcomes in court.

Further investigation shows that the builder commonly brought cases to court primarily to contest penalties imposed upon them or to dispute project delays, attributing these delays to external factors or unclear land classifications. The litigation seems to stem from a consistent effort to avoid financial repercussions tied to regulatory compliance or operational hiccups.

Unfortunately, the builder lost these cases for several reasons. There was a notable lack of adherence to legal and regulatory requirements, with the court consistently emphasizing compliance before further proceedings. Insufficient evidence to back up claims or misunderstandings of complex land and project classification rules also contributed to the negative outcomes.

In conclusion, the builder’s experiences in these court cases expose a critical need for robust legal strategies and a comprehensive understanding of regulatory frameworks within the real estate sector. Buyers should be cautious and consider these legal aspects when engaging with builders to mitigate potential risks in their property transactions.