CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the competitive real estate market, choosing the right builder is critical for a seamless home-buying experience. Shiv Niketan Enterprise, operating in Gujarat, presents an interesting case study with its legal history, specifically concerning customer complaints and legal battles. This blog post delves into the builder's track record, analyzes complaint patterns, and provides useful tips for prospective buyers.
Name: Shiv Niketan Enterprise
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
States with Projects: Gujarat
Shiv Niketan Enterprise's legal scenario reveals a singular complaint that culminated in a lost case. The core of the complaint involved allegations by the complainant regarding the builder's failure to deliver full and peaceful occupation as per the sanctioned plans, alongside a lack of promised facilities, such as a banquet hall and a parking shed. The company's defense claimed that all facilities were provided as per agreement and contested the complainant's claim to a common plot. Ultimately, the RERA authority ruled in favor of the complainant, ordering the builder to hand over possession of the common plot and transfer the conveyance deed to the society.
Cases Lost:
Common Factors: The complaint indicates a significant issue with the delivery of promised amenities and facilities, which can lead to dissatisfaction and disputes. It highlights a potential pattern where the builder may not meet the expectations set in the agreements made with clients.
Cases Won:
Analysis: While the builder lost the only documented case, it's important to note that there were no cases won, indicating a troubling record when facing complaints. This may signal to potential buyers increased risks in terms of realizing value for their investments.
Given the data available, Shiv Niketan Enterprise's legal history raises concerns for potential buyers. With one complaint leading to a lost case, prospective homebuyers may need to approach with caution and thorough research. Buyers are encouraged to ensure that they receive clear documentation of promises made concerning amenities and project details.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Shiv Niketan Enterprise, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns underlying the disputes. The cases highlight ongoing issues primarily revolving around three critical themes: failure to provide promised facilities, disputes over common plot possession, and non-compliance with sanctioned plans.
The first theme, failure to provide promised facilities, stands out in the cases where the complainant alleges that the builder did not deliver essential amenities as per the agreement, such as banquet halls and parking sheds. This indicates a significant area of concern for potential buyers who expect a certain level of satisfaction in their investment. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of fulfilling their obligations, but the verdicts suggest otherwise, signaling a disconnect between the builder’s promises and delivery of services.
The second theme, disputes over common plot possession, reflects the tension between the builder and the buyers over ownership and rights to common areas. In one notable case, the builder contested the complainant's entitlement to the possession of the common plot, yet the RERA authority ruled in favor of the complainants. This highlights the builders' tendency to obstruct rightful ownership, which could be a major red flag for future buyers.
Lastly, the theme of non-compliance with sanctioned plans is a broad category that encompasses various regulatory and planning failures. While the specifics in the cases vary, the consistent verdicts against the builder indicate a systemic issue where the builder's operations may not align with legal frameworks and planning guidelines. This raises questions about the builder's reliability and adherence to standards that ensure buyer satisfaction and safety.
Common reasons for the litigation in these cases include contesting the builder's failure to provide agreed-upon facilities, disputing ownership rights to common plots, and alleging non-compliance with planning regulations. The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence supporting their claims, failure to adhere to the regulatory requirements, and rulings from authority figures that have jurisdiction over real estate transactions in the region.
In conclusion, the analysis of these cases presents a concerning portrait of Shiv Niketan Enterprise. Buyers should be wary of patterns indicating potential issues in fulfilling promises and complying with regulations. Doing thorough research and assessing these themes is crucial for making informed decisions in real estate investments.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!