| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive landscape of real estate, choosing the right builder is paramount for prospective buyers. This blog post delves into the legal performance of SHIV SAI DEVELOPERS, examining their track record with complaints, cases won, and cases lost, alongside insights that can guide potential customers in making informed decisions.
Overview of SHIV SAI DEVELOPERS
SHIV SAI DEVELOPERS has been active in Maharashtra and boasts a mix of projects that have attracted a considerable volume of complaints. With a total of 68 complaints filed against them, the builder has navigated a challenging legal environment, winning 33 cases and losing 35 cases.Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost by SHIV SAI DEVELOPERS
Out of the total complaints, a significant number involve the builder losing cases. Here are some trends and patterns observed in the cases they have lost:
- Recurring Themes: Many lost cases revolve around issues related to …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Shiv Sai Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes presented in court.
The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: Cross Appeals and Documentation, Payment Disputes with Allottees, and Delay Condonation and Procedural Compliance.
Many of the cases revolve around the issue of cross appeals, where the builder's claims of having filed necessary documentation with the Registry were contested by the appellants. This highlights a significant area of concern regarding the builder’s adherence to legal processes and documentation practices, as repeatedly the builder was asked to furnish details of their appeals, indicating a lack of clarity or transparency in their initial filings.
Payment disputes with allottees constitute another major theme, with multiple cases centered on the claimed payment of Rs. 7,000/- to the allottees, which the respondent contested. This indicates a …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by the builder SHIV SAI DEVELOPERS that resulted in losses revealed several key insights into the nature and common themes of disputes faced by this builder. The cases prominently feature elements related to 'Delayed Possession Claims' and 'Disputes over Financial Penalties', often resulting in the builder being required to deposit significant sums as directed by the court. Additionally, issues surrounding 'Non-compliance with Municipal Orders' and 'Regulatory Compliance Issues' have surfaced, highlighting the builder's challenges in adhering to established guidelines.
The recurring theme among the disputes relates to the builder contesting financial penalties likely stemming from delayed project completions. This indicates a pattern where the builder may have faced challenges not merely related to construction timelines but possibly also linked to coordination with regulatory authorities, leading to disputes over anticipated possession dates and financial obligations. Furthermore, there seems to be a tendency for the builder …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information.
The builder, SHIV SAI DEVELOPERS, has predominantly been involved in disputes centered around delays, specifically focusing on the delay in condoning applications and filing appeals. The cases consistently indicate that the builder contested these delays, attributing them to unforeseen circumstances while opposing parties claimed the delays were unjustified.
In examining the common themes, it appears that these disputes often arise when the builder seeks to condone delays that have occurred during the legal process. The ability of the builder to bring these cases to court suggests a proactive approach in defending their interests, particularly regarding project timelines and compliance with procedural protocols.
One noteworthy pattern extends to the reasons the builder won these cases. In almost all instances, the tribunal granted delay condonation favoring SHIV SAI DEVELOPERS, reflecting a successful defense against claims made …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SHIV SAI DEVELOPERS, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes can be grouped into several common themes that highlight the nature of the allegations and the defenses raised by the builder.
- Affidavit Disputes: A recurring issue in several cases was the claim that additional affidavits filed by the builder were not considered by the tribunal.
- The builder consistently defended these claims by asserting that the affidavits were filed without proper leave, resulting in the tribunal dismissing the appeals and ordering costs to be deposited.
- Delayed Proceedings: Multiple cases involved allegations of delays in proceedings, where the appellants sought condonation for the delays attributed to the builder.
- The builder countered that the appellants themselves had caused delays, leading to adjournments and giving the respondent one final chance to settle costs.
- Claims of Delays by Respondents: Interestingly, …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!