SHIV SHAKTI ENTERPRISE logo

SHIV SHAKTI ENTERPRISE

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat, ગુજરાત
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Shiv Shakti Enterprise, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat, has recently attracted scrutiny due to its legal track record. With a total of two complaints filed against them, both of which they lost, it raises questions about their operational integrity and reliability. This blog post will delve into the builder's case history, patterns in their legal disputes, and provide insights for potential buyers considering purchasing from them.

Legal Case Overview

In examining the legal disputes involving Shiv Shakti Enterprise, we can see a pattern in the outcomes of these cases.

Cases Filed Against the Builder

  1. Case 1: The builder was penalized for not submitting quarterly reports for their project "ઓરો વિસ્ટા." The authority imposed a fine of ₹50,000 owing to this negligence. The builder claimed ignorance of the law and did not intend to violate the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act (RERA).
  2. Case 2: The second case did …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements Penalties for Project Delays Disputes over Transparency and Reporting

Analysis of the cases filed against Shiv Shakti Enterprise, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight ongoing issues in the builder's adherence to regulatory standards, timely project delivery, and transparent reporting.

The first type of case involves penalties for delays, specifically in relation to the builder's project 'Oro Vista.' In this instance, the builder failed to furnish mandatory quarterly reports on time, which led to a financial penalty of ₹50,000 imposed by the authority. This case underscores a pattern where builders may face legal repercussions due to insufficient organizational practices that prioritize compliance.

Another theme evident in the cases is non-compliance with regulatory requirements. Although specific details of the second case remain vague, the fact that the complaint was withdrawn suggests that there may have been underlying issues related to the builder's operations that did not meet regulatory standards. Withdrawing a …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review