
CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
Shiv Shakti Enterprise, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat, has recently attracted scrutiny due to its legal track record. With a total of two complaints filed against them, both of which they lost, it raises questions about their operational integrity and reliability. This blog post will delve into the builder's case history, patterns in their legal disputes, and provide insights for potential buyers considering purchasing from them.
Legal Case Overview
In examining the legal disputes involving Shiv Shakti Enterprise, we can see a pattern in the outcomes of these cases.
Cases Filed Against the Builder
- Case 1: The builder was penalized for not submitting quarterly reports for their project "ઓરો વિસ્ટા." The authority imposed a fine of ₹50,000 owing to this negligence. The builder claimed ignorance of the law and did not intend to violate the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act (RERA).
- Case 2: The second case did …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Shiv Shakti Enterprise, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight ongoing issues in the builder's adherence to regulatory standards, timely project delivery, and transparent reporting.
The first type of case involves penalties for delays, specifically in relation to the builder's project 'Oro Vista.' In this instance, the builder failed to furnish mandatory quarterly reports on time, which led to a financial penalty of ₹50,000 imposed by the authority. This case underscores a pattern where builders may face legal repercussions due to insufficient organizational practices that prioritize compliance.
Another theme evident in the cases is non-compliance with regulatory requirements. Although specific details of the second case remain vague, the fact that the complaint was withdrawn suggests that there may have been underlying issues related to the builder's operations that did not meet regulatory standards. Withdrawing a …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!