SHIV SHARAN INVESTMENT logo

SHIV SHARAN INVESTMENT

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Punjab
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for a successful investment. In this blog post, we will closely examine Shiv Sharan Investment, analyzing their performance based on legal cases and customer complaints. With an objective view, we aim to provide potential buyers with valuable insights into this builder.

Overview of Shiv Sharan Investment

Shiv Sharan Investment operates primarily in Punjab and has faced some significant challenges in the legal arena. With only two complaints registered against them, the outcome of their legal battles raises questions about their reliability and adherence to regulations.

Legal Case Analysis

Complaints and Case Outcomes

Shiv Sharan Investment has a record of 2 complaints, both of which resulted in lost cases. The summaries of these cases are as follows:

  1. Case 1: The complainant sought relief for refund, interest, and compensation due to alleged violations of provisions of the Act. However, the builder argued that the complaint failed as it was filed against an unregistered ongoing project. The verdict led to the dismissal of the complaint.
  2. Case 2: Similar to the first case, the complainant again sought refund, interest, and compensation but faced the same argument from the builder regarding the unregistered status of the project. This case was also dismissed for the same reason.

Common Patterns in Lost Cases

A notable pattern from the cases Shiv Sharan Investment lost is the frequent invocation of the project’s unregistered status. The builder successfully argued that the complaints were not maintainable because they were filed against an ongoing project that lacked proper registration. This raises concerns about the builder's compliance with legal requirements for registering their projects, which is essential for protecting consumer rights under the relevant Acts.

Common Factors for Won Cases

Interestingly, it is important to note that Shiv Sharan Investment has not won any legal cases. The consistent outcomes of their legal challenges emphasize potential operational or regulatory shortcomings.

Conclusion

Based on the provided data, Shiv Sharan Investment presents a concerning picture for potential buyers. Their track record of losing all legal cases, along with the nature of the complaints, points to issues related to project registration and compliance with the law. This might suggest a risky avenue for investment, leaving prospective homeowners in a vulnerable position regarding their rights and financial safety.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Research Thoroughly: Always conduct comprehensive research about a builder’s background, their legal standing, and any complaints against them.
  2. Verify Registration: Ensure that the builder’s projects are registered according to local regulations, which can provide some peace of mind against future disputes.
  3. Read Reviews: Look for reviews from previous buyers to gain insights into their experiences, especially regarding the builder's responsiveness and adherence to commitments.
  4. Consult Legal Experts: Before making a significant investment, consider consulting legal experts who specialize in real estate to review contracts and protect your interests.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

  • Check Credentials: Verify the builder’s credentials, licensing, and prior projects.
  • Understand the Market: Familiarize yourself with the local real estate market trends to gauge fair pricing and demand.
  • Engagement: Ensure open lines of communication with your chosen builder to address any concerns promptly.
  • Be Cautious of Red Flags: Watch for signs of poor business practices, like unaddressed customer complaints or reluctance to provide project details.

By keeping these considerations in mind, buyers can mitigate potential risks associated with selecting a builder and make informed decisions for their investments.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Claims for Refund Unregistered Projects Compensation Requests

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Shiv Sharan Investment, which it lost, reveals some intriguing patterns and insights regarding their litigation strategies and the challenges they faced in the courts.

The cases primarily centered around claims for refunds, compensation, and interest due to alleged violations of regulations. An important theme that emerges is the builder's disputes related to ongoing projects that were not registered, leading to significant complications in their claims.

In these cases, the builder frequently sought relief for refunds, interest payments, and compensation on grounds of non-compliance with legal provisions of the relevant real estate regulations.

However, the defenses raised by the respondents pointed to the principle that the complaints were not maintainable due to the unregistered status of the ongoing projects. This highlights a critical aspect of real estate development where registration and compliance are paramount for legal suits to be considered valid.

Common triggers for the builder's litigation appear to be disputes over claims for refunds and compliance-related grievances from buyers. The builder seemed intent on contesting the requests made by buyers for refunds and compensation, perhaps indicating a pattern of dissatisfaction among consumers due to possible delays or unfulfilled promises.

However, the verdicts commonly found against the builder suggest a trend of losing due to insufficient legal grounding or evidence presented in their claims. A recurring reason for the negative outcome in these cases was the failure to comply with statutory requirements for project registration. The courts dismissed the complaints on the basis that they were filed against projects that were simply not registered, thereby leaving the builder without a valid defense.

In conclusion, the analysis indicates that potential buyers should exercise caution and carefully consider the builder's compliance with regulatory requirements and project registrations. The pattern of losing claims highlights the importance of ensuring that all necessary legal frameworks are adhered to for a builder to mitigate disputes effectively.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review