SHIV UGATI DEVELOPERS

Introduction

In the competitive landscape of real estate, potential buyers frequently seek clarity on builders' reputations, particularly regarding past complaints and legal engagements. This post focuses on Shiv Ugati Developers, a builder with operations primarily in Gujarat. While they have completed some projects, their record shows a mix of successes and challenges, shedding light on buyer experiences and legal outcomes.

Company Overview

• Name: Shiv Ugati Developers
• Number of Complaints: 7
• Cases Won: 2
• Cases Lost: 5
• States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal Case Insights

Cases Won by Shiv Ugati Developers

Shiv Ugati Developers has managed to win 2 cases, where the complaints were withdrawn by the complainants.

1. Case 1: The first case was disposed of as withdrawn, indicating that the complainant may have reevaluated their position.
2. Case 2: The second case also saw a similar outcome with the complaint being withdrawn, which does not necessarily reflect the builder's performance but rather the decisions of the buyers involved.

Cases Lost by Shiv Ugati Developers

While Shiv Ugati Developers won two cases, they lost 5 cases. Here are the prevailing patterns:

• Delays in Property Possession: Multiple cases revolved around the builder's failure to deliver properties within promised timelines. For instance, a complainant raised concerns over not receiving possession within four years, asserting a claim for a refund.
• Financial Disputes: Several complaints involved disputes regarding financial transactions, where buyers sought refunds and compensation due to unfulfilled promises. The RERA Authority often mandated the builder to refund substantial sums with interest, underscoring serious accountability issues.
• Regulatory Compliance Issues: The builder faced penalties for failing to submit mandatory quarterly reports, indicating a possible lack of awareness or disregard for regulatory frameworks that govern real estate.

Assessment of Shiv Ugati Developers

Based on the available data, Shiv Ugati Developers displays some troubling trends in customer satisfaction and adherence to regulatory requirements. With 7 complaints, including significant losses in legal disputes, potential buyers should exercise caution. The builder's inability to uphold commitments regarding property possession and the frequent financial misunderstandings suggest a need for thorough due diligence before engagement.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Research Thoroughly: Before committing to any project, potential buyers should conduct comprehensive research, including reviews of other buyer experiences and the builder's track record.
• Understand Legal Obligations: Familiarize yourself with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) regulations and ensure the builder complies with all requirements, especially regarding timelines and documentation.
• Get Everything in Writing: Ensure that all commitments regarding possession dates, payment schedules, and project specifications are documented clearly in your purchase agreement.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Check Online Reviews: Look for third-party websites and forums discussing builder reputations and recommend checking multiple sources for a balanced view.
2. Visit Completed Projects: Where possible, visit previously completed projects to gauge the quality of construction and get a sense of how well the builder meets their commitments.
3. Talk to Previous Buyers: Gathering firsthand accounts from previous buyers can provide invaluable insights about construction quality, customer service, and post-purchase support.
4. Assess Financial Stability: A builder's financial health can impact their ability to complete projects; ensure they have a solid financial foundation.

Conclusion

Shiv Ugati Developers’ mixed record highlights the importance of thorough research and caution when selecting a builder. Their track record of delays and lost legal cases serves as a reminder for buyers to prioritize diligent preparations and informed decision-making. Ultimately, the journey to property ownership can be navigated successfully with the right approach, ensuring peace of mind and satisfaction in the long run.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shiv Ugati Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and compliance with real estate regulations. The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with RERA, refund and interest disputes, and administrative charge and fee disputes.

The most prevalent theme among the cases was delayed possession claims. In multiple instances, buyers claimed that Shiv Ugati Developers failed to provide possession of flats within the promised timelines. For example, in one case, the buyer paid Rs. 6,79,000 for a flat in the 'Shiva Ugati City' project, which was supposed to be completed within four years. However, when the possession was not handed over on time, the buyer sought a refund along with interest. The authority ruled in favor of the buyer, indicating a serious failure on the part of the builder to meet contractual obligations.

Non-compliance with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) was another common theme. The builder was penalized for failing to submit quarterly reports on time, highlighting their disregard for regulatory requirements. This not only incurs legal costs for the builder but also raises concerns about their transparency and accountability in dealing with buyers.

Refund and interest disputes also featured prominently in the cases. Buyers often found themselves seeking refunds due to the builder’s inability to deliver properties on schedule. In one significant case, the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority ordered Shiv Ugati Developers to refund Rs. 6,79,000 along with 9.20% interest per annum to a buyer. This demonstrates a pattern where buyers were not only denied timely possession but also faced a struggle to obtain appropriate compensation.

Lastly, administrative charge and fee disputes emerged as a theme. Buyers contested the builder's administrative charges, which they believed were unfairly deducted from their payments. The builder's defense often revolved around their claims of compliance with procedures, yet the outcomes suggest a lack of clarity or fairness in implementing these charges.

The reasons people commonly brought cases against Shiv Ugati Developers primarily revolved around frustrations related to project delays, non-compliance with RERA, and financial disputes regarding refunds and administrative charges. Buyers were often driven to seek legal recourse due to the builder's failure to adhere to timelines and regulations, leading to significant emotional and financial strain on buyers.

The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include insufficient evidence to defend their actions, non-compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and a lack of transparency regarding project timelines and financial dealings. The repeated failures to meet deadlines and fulfill contractual obligations suggest systemic issues within the company's operational practices. Furthermore, the penalties imposed for non-compliance with RERA highlight a concerning disregard for the regulatory framework established to protect buyers in the real estate market.

In conclusion, the analysis of these cases raises critical questions about the reliability and accountability of Shiv Ugati Developers. Buyers should approach engagements with this builder with caution, weighing carefully against the evident risks illustrated by the outcomes of these legal disputes.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SHIV UGATI DEVELOPERS, which it won, revealed the following information.

The legal proceedings primarily fall under a few common themes:

1. Case Withdrawals: In both instances analyzed, the cases were disposed of as withdrawn. This indicates a trend where the opposing parties chose to retract their claims before any substantive court decisions were reached.
2. Dispute Resolutions: The predominance of cases withdrawn suggests that disputes may have been resolved through negotiations or settlements outside the courtroom, implying a willingness to find common ground rather than engage in protracted litigation.
3. Claims Dismissed: There is a clear indication that the claims made against the builder did not progress to the point of requiring a judge's decision, potentially highlighting weaknesses in those claims.

The common reasons the builder may have brought these cases to court often involve contesting penalties or defending its interests against allegations that may have been unfounded. Notably, the fact that these cases were withdrawn suggests that the opposition may have realized the challenges in substantiating their claims or chose to settle the matter amicably.

When examining why SHIV UGATI DEVELOPERS emerged victorious in these cases, it is evident that factors such as insufficient evidence from the opposing parties played a crucial role. These outcomes point to the builder's ability to effectively defend against what could have been perceived as false or exaggerated claims.

This analysis indicates a robust reputation for SHIV UGATI DEVELOPERS within the real estate market, as the recurring theme of case withdrawals signifies that buyers or opposing parties may sometimes engage in disputes that do not hold up under scrutiny. It is indicative of a broader reality in real estate: builders can be subjected to unfounded claims leading to unnecessary legal battles.

In conclusion, to potential buyers, it is paramount to approach the real estate market with discernment and to make informed decisions. While genuine disputes may arise, the analysis of these cases signifies that builders like SHIV UGATI DEVELOPERS is often well-prepared to defend themselves against undue accusations. As a prospective buyer, it is critical to seek reliable information and conduct thorough due diligence on a builder’s reputation, ensuring that opinions are formed from an informed perspective rather than anecdotal claims.