SHIVALAY

Introduction

When considering a builder for your next home, it's essential to analyze their track record and any legal issues they may have faced. One such builder is SHIVALAY, operating in the state of Gujarat. In this post, we will delve deep into the performance of SHIVALAY, exploring their legal cases, victories and losses, to provide potential homebuyers with insightful assessments and practical tips.

Overview of SHIVALAY

• Builder Name: SHIVALAY
• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 1
• Cases Lost: 0
• States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal Case Details

Case Summary

SHIVALAY had one notable case filed against them, where the appellants (complainants) claimed that the builder failed to submit Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) on time, thus violating the RERA Act and Rules. In response, SHIVALAY contended that they had submitted the reports within the extended deadline and sought to have the complaint withdrawn. The final verdict resulted in the complaints being withdrawn by the Authority after the reports were submitted.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Patterns in Lost Cases

1. Frequency of Complaints: SHIVALAY has faced only one complaint, indicating limited customer dissatisfaction.
2. Resolution Approach: The complaint involved a minor administrative discrepancy regarding report submissions rather than major contractual issues, showcasing the builder’s focus on compliance once alerted.

Patterns in Won Cases

• Effective Resolution: SHIVALAY managed to effectively resolve the complaint by providing the necessary documentation within the extended deadline. This reflects a commitment to adhere to regulations and customer communication.
• Proactive Response: The builder’s ability to respond proactively and rectify issues raises confidence and falls in line with industry best practices.

Conclusion

Overall, SHIVALAY has demonstrated a positive legal standing with one case won and zero losses. The case they faced was resolved amicably through prompt action on their part, reinforcing a sense of reliability. This suggests that potential buyers might approach SHIVALAY with a degree of confidence, knowing that they are willing to address concerns promptly.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Builder's Reputation: Investigate builder reviews and past projects to get a sense of their quality and reliability.
2. Verify Legal Standing: Ensure the builder has a clear legal history with minimal complaints and resolved cases effectively.
3. Engagement in Communication: Open lines of communication are vital; ensure the builder is responsive to queries and concerns.
4. Understand Project Timelines: Confirm the builder's adherence to timelines and whether any past delays affected previous projects.

General Recommendations for Selecting Any Builder

• Check Credentials: Validate their registrations and affiliations with relevant housing authorities.
• Examine Project Quality: Visit completed projects to assess construction quality and standards.
• Contract Review: Have a legal advisor review contracts prior to signing to ensure all terms are clear and fair.
• Seek Recommendations: Engage with previous customers who have experience with the builder to gain valuable insights.

In summary, while SHIVALAY has established a solid performance with efficient resolutions to legal matters, potential buyers should always conduct thorough due diligence when selecting a builder for their future home.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SHIVALAY, which the builder won, revealed the following insights regarding the nature of disputes and outcomes.

The cases against SHIVALAY can be categorized under common themes. The primary issues include regulatory compliance, specifically regarding the timely submission of Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs), and claims related to project delays. Many complaints centered on whether SHIVALAY adhered to the provisions of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act and Rules, alongside contractual stipulations regarding project timelines and reporting.

The trends in these cases show that complaints were often motivated by buyers' concerns over delayed project deliveries or perceived negligence from the builder in following regulatory procedures. In this instance, the opposing parties argued about the builder's alleged failure to submit QPRs on time, indicating a broader investor anxiety about transparency and accountability in construction projects.

However, the builder successfully defended itself in these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence presented by the opposing parties. For instance, SHIVALAY was able to prove that they submitted the QPRs within the authorized time frame, leading the regulatory authority to withdraw complaints against them. Such outcomes suggest that claims made by buyers or regulatory bodies can sometimes be exaggerated or lack the necessary factual foundation.

This analysis reflects positively on SHIVALAY's reputation in the real estate market, demonstrating their ability to navigate legal challenges effectively. It does highlight, however, a notable reality: buyers can sometimes initiate legal proceedings based on misunderstandings or inaccurate claims about builders’ actions. This emphasizes the importance of thorough scrutiny when evaluating disputes in the real estate sector.

In conclusion, potential buyers must consider the complexities of the real estate market and the potential for miscommunication that can lead to disputes. While legitimate grievances do exist, the history of SHIVALAY indicates that they possess the capability to defend their practices robustly. For buyers, this serves as a crucial reminder: approaching claims with a discerning eye, ensuring that they seek accurate information before forming judgments on a builder’s reputation, is essential.