SHIVALAY BUILDERS

Introduction to SHIVALAY BUILDERS

SHIVALAY BUILDERS, a construction firm operating in Gujarat, has recently come under scrutiny due to legal issues that concern potential buyers and investors. With a record of only one complaint and one case won, the company presents a mixed bag of outcomes that require careful consideration.

Legal Case Overview

SHIVALAY BUILDERS has a notable legal history, having lost one case and faced penalties as a result. The primary complaint stemmed from the failure of the builder to submit its annual audit report on time. In this situation, the builder claimed technical difficulties prevented the timely submission; however, the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (GUJRERA) ruled against the builder, resulting in a fine of Rs. 15,000. This case reflects the challenges SHIVALAY BUILDERS has faced regarding compliance and transparency, which are critical for potential property buyers.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Cases Lost

The only case lost by SHIVALAY BUILDERS was due to non-compliance with regulatory requirements. A clear pattern can be observed here, indicating that issues related to documentation and timely submissions have serious implications for the builder's reputation and reliability. The lost case highlights the importance of adherence to legal obligations, particularly in the highly regulated real estate sector.

Cases Won

Interestingly, SHIVALAY BUILDERS does not have any cases won; therefore, drawing patterns from victories is not applicable in this scenario. This lack of favorable outcomes raises questions about the firm’s operational practices and their impact on project management and customer satisfaction.

Conclusion: Overall Assessment of SHIVALAY BUILDERS

Based on the available data, SHIVALAY BUILDERS has faced legal challenges that could deter potential buyers. The sole incident of losing a case and the associated penalties indicate concerns regarding compliance and the builder's ability to fulfill regulatory obligations.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Due Diligence: Before engaging with SHIVALAY BUILDERS or any builder, conduct thorough research on their past projects and legal standing. Understanding their compliance history can help mitigate future risks.
• Transparency in Communication: Engage directly with the builder to ensure they provide clear and accurate information regarding project timelines, legalities, and documentation.
• Visit Existing Projects: If possible, visit properties previously developed by SHIVALAY BUILDERS. This first-hand experience can provide insight into the builder’s construction quality and timeliness.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

• Research Reviews and Ratings: Look for feedback from past clients to gauge the builder’s performance and customer satisfaction levels.
• Understand Legal Standing: Ensure that the builder has a clean legal record by checking for complaints or lawsuits against them. Review any outcomes to see if they have faced penalties or lost cases.
• Clarify Terms: Make sure you understand all contract terms before signing anything. Don’t hesitate to clarify any jargon or complex terms.
• Seek Professional Advice: Consult with real estate experts or legal advisors to ensure that your interests are safeguarded when entering a property transaction.

In conclusion, potential buyers should approach SHIVALAY BUILDERS with caution and thorough research, ensuring to evaluate both the company's track record and their own requirements in a builder.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shivalay Builders, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight two primary areas of concern: regulatory compliance issues and delay-related disputes.

In terms of regulatory compliance, the cases demonstrate a pattern where the builder faced penalties for failing to adhere to required procedures. For instance, the project was fined for not submitting its annual audit report on time, citing technical issues as the cause for the delay. This reflects a broader trend seen with builders who may not prioritize compliance with regulatory requirements, leading to legal consequences.

Delay-related disputes also emerge as a significant theme in these cases. While the specific details provided focus more on the regulatory aspect of delays (such as late submission of reports), it is important to note that delays in projects often spur disputes, particularly when parties disagree over the causes or consequences of these delays. In the case of Shivalay Builders, the delay in submitting the audit report resulted in a financial penalty, indicating a systemic issue that could potentially affect project timelines and participant expectations.

The reasons people commonly bring cases against Shivalay Builders seem to revolve around the builder’s failure to meet regulatory deadlines and comply with legal requirements. This suggests a pattern where the builder may be contesting penalties imposed due to its own operational inefficiencies rather than external factors beyond its control.

The conclusion that can be drawn from the outcomes of these cases is that Shivalay Builders has faced challenges related to maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements, which has resulted in legal losses. The common factor in the builder's losses appears to be insufficient adherence to established rules and timelines, leading to penalties that could have been avoided with proper planning and execution.