Analysis of the cases filed against Shivalay Corporation, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around the builder's obligations regarding amenities, compliance with the General Development Control Regulations (GDCR), and issues related to project delays.

One of the most notable types of cases involves disputes over the provision of amenities. In these cases, the complainants often claim that the builder failed to deliver promised amenities or did not adhere to the revised sanctioned plans that set aside adequate land for such purposes. This theme highlights a significant area of concern for potential buyers who expect a certain level of recreational and community facilities in their developments.

The reason people commonly bring these cases to court stems from the importance of these amenities in enhancing the living experience. Buyers feel cheated when they are not provided with the facilities they were assured of during the marketing phase. In the case of Shivalay Corporation, the specific claims revolved around the direction to provide amenities as per GDCR, indicating a legal obligation that was likely not met.

The builder’s defense in these cases is often inadequate or not provided, leading to a pattern of rulings against them. The common reasons for losing these cases include non-compliance with legal standards (such as the GDCR) and a failure to fulfill contractual commitments regarding project amenities.

In conclusion, the cases against Shivalay Corporation serve as a warning to potential buyers about the builder's track record regarding project amenities and compliance with regulatory frameworks. It is essential for buyers to conduct thorough research, seek direct testimonials from previous buyers, and closely examine a builder's legal history before making any purchase decisions.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SHIVALAY CORPORATION, which it won, revealed the following information.

The builder’s cases primarily revolved around themes of dispute resolution and the withdrawal of complaints, with a noticeable pattern in project-related disputes. The summary indicates that buyers sometimes initiated legal actions, possibly due to misunderstandings or dissatisfaction with project timelines, but many of these cases resulted in amicable resolutions, leading to withdrawals.

The common reasons why SHIVALAY CORPORATION brought these cases to court included contesting claims made against it, clarifying disputes over project timelines, and addressing grievances from buyers. A pattern that emerges shows that issues often stemmed from miscommunication or differing expectations regarding project progress and completion.

In terms of winning these cases, SHIVALAY CORPORATION often demonstrated that opposing parties could lack sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims. Additionally, there may have been instances of non-compliance with legal/contractual requirements from buyers or other parties, leading to favorable outcomes for the builder. This implies that SHIVALAY CORPORATION effectively defended itself against unjust allegations, sometimes arising from buyers’ frustrations rather than legit grievances.

This analysis offers insights into SHIVALAY CORPORATION’s reputation and highlights a broader issue within the real estate market. It can be challenging for builders when faced with accusations, especially when these claims are either exaggerated or unfounded. The builder’s strong track record in defending against such claims reflects a robust operational ethos and suggests a credible standing in the market.

For potential buyers, this reinforces the importance of making informed decisions. While legitimate grievances exist in real estate transactions, the experiences of SHIVALAY CORPORATION remind us that legal battles can arise from misunderstandings. Buyers should approach claims critically and seek thorough and reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation. Thoughtful consideration and due diligence are essential in navigating the complex landscape of real estate dealings.

This dictionary provides a structured overview of the case summaries while offering insights into the builder's practices and guidance for potential buyers.