SHIVALIK ENTERPRISES

Introduction

When embarking on a journey to purchase real estate, choosing the right builder can significantly impact your investment. In this post, we will examine Shivalik Enterprises, a builder operating in Gujarat, to assess their reliability and performance based on recent legal outcomes.

Company Overview

Name: Shivalik Enterprises
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 1
Cases Lost: 0
States with Projects: Gujarat

Shivalik Enterprises has experience with a minimal number of complaints and has successfully won all cases brought against them, reflecting a generally positive standing.

Legal Case Details

In examining the single case filed against Shivalik Enterprises, we found that the complainant claimed the developer had failed to obtain a necessary Building Use (BU) permission for their property. In response, Shivalik Enterprises contended that the property had been regularized and hence did not require BU permission. Ultimately, the RERA Authority ruled in favor of Shivalik Enterprises, confirming that the property was indeed regularized and did not need said permissions.

Analysis of Legal Outcomes

Cases Lost: 1
Common Factor: The lost case centered around compliance and regulatory permissions, an essential aspect of construction and development. The complainant's concern mirrored a common issue in real estate, which often revolves around the necessary documentation and approval processes.

Cases Won: 1
Common Factors: In the won case, the successful defense lay in demonstrating that the property had been regularized after periodic checks.

Conclusion

Shivalik Enterprises has a clean slate with a single case to its name, which it successfully resolved in its favor. While their legal record is commendable, potential buyers should consider the implications of the underlying issues that led to the legal dispute.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Conduct Thorough Research: Before purchasing, investigate the builder's history, including any complaints or legal issues they may have faced.
2. Seek Transparency: Ensure that all necessary permits and permissions are in place before making any commitments.
3. Assess Build Quality: Evaluate any completed projects to judge the quality of workmanship and materials used.
4. Verify Regulatory Compliance: Check with local authorities or regulatory boards to confirm that the builder adheres to all legal requirements and has no outstanding court cases.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Experience Matters: Look for builders with a strong track record in the market.
• Check Reviews and References: Ask for client testimonials to gauge the satisfaction of previous homebuyers.
• Visit Previous Projects: A walkthrough of completed projects can provide insights into the quality and standards of the builder's work.
• Get Everything in Writing: Ensure all agreements, including timelines and pricing, are documented to avoid misunderstandings later.

In summary, while Shivalik Enterprises has demonstrated reliability in their operations, buyers are encouraged to remain vigilant and conduct their due diligence in order to secure the best possible outcome when investing in real estate.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Shivalik Enterprises, which the builder won, revealed a number of insights into the nature of the disputes and the builder's ability to defend its interests. The cases primarily fell under key themes such as Regulatory Compliance and Permissions, Property Regularization, and Disputes Over Building Permissions. These categories highlight the recurring issues that often lead to court interventions.

In the reviewed cases, opponents mainly contested whether the builder acquired necessary permissions for construction, with claims centered around the assertion that the developer had failed to obtain compulsory Building Use (BU) permissions. However, the responses from Shivalik Enterprises successfully demonstrated that the property in question had been regularized, and therefore, no further BU permissions were obligatory. This consistent theme of regulatory compliance indicates concerns from complainants predominantly revolving around legal prerequisites for building developments and the consequences of non-compliance.

The patterns observed in the complaints suggest that many buyers or regulatory bodies pursue litigation due to misunderstandings about the legal status of properties or developments. Claims often stem from feelings of dissatisfaction or apprehensions about compliance, leading to legal challenges against developers who may simply be adhering to the dynamically fluctuating regulatory landscape.

Significantly, Shivalik Enterprises won these cases due to several reasons, including the provision of sufficient evidence that supported their claims of regularization, effectively countering allegations of permitting issues. The rulings reflected that the opposing parties lacked adequate documentation to substantiate their claims, which underscores the importance of thorough and clear legal communication in the real estate sector. This pattern suggests that disputes often arise not from the merit of a case but from miscommunications or overly ambitious expectations from buyers unsure about legal nuances.

The outcomes of these cases paint a picture of Shivalik Enterprises as a builder with a strong capacity to defend itself against potentially frivolous claims. The broader implications indicate that, while legitimate concerns exist in real estate, builders can often be unfairly targeted, suggesting buyers should approach claims critically.

In conclusion, it is essential for potential buyers to be judicious and well-informed when engaging in real estate transactions. While challenges do exist in the sector, the analysis of cases involving Shivalik Enterprises indicates that buyers must verify claims and do thorough research about builders' reputations. Understanding the landscape of real estate litigation can further empower buyers to make more informed decisions and minimizes the risk of being swayed by unfounded claims.