SHIVALIK JANVI INFRASPESH, LLP

Introduction

In the competitive landscape of real estate, understanding a builder's track record is crucial for potential buyers. One such builder, Shivalik Janvi Infraspesh, LLP, has made a mark in the state of Gujarat. However, a closer look at their legal history reveals important insights into their construction practices and customer satisfaction levels.

Company Overview

Builder Name: Shivalik Janvi Infraspesh, LLP
State with Projects: Gujarat
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1

Shivalik Janvi Infraspesh, LLP operates in the Gujarat real estate market. However, their involvement in legal disputes raises flags that potential buyers should consider.

Legal Case Details

Shivalik Janvi Infraspesh, LLP has been involved in a total of one significant legal case that impacts their reputation:

• Summary of the Case: The complaint centered around poor quality construction in the Shivalik Sharda Park View project. Ultimately, this case was voluntarily withdrawn by the complainant, indicating either a resolution was reached outside of court or possibly the complainant was unable to sustain the case. Importantly, this means that the builder has not secured a legal victory in any cases, further highlighting potential concerns regarding the quality of their projects.

Case Analysis

Patterns in Lost Cases

• Quality Concerns: The sole case recorded against Shivalik Janvi Infraspesh, LLP revolves around quality issues in construction, a critical factor that often turns disputes into legal actions. The fundamental nature of the complaint suggests a serious lapse in construction standards that could deter future buyers.

Patterns in Won Cases

• Withdrawn Complaints: Notably, although the builder has faced one complaint, it was voluntary withdrawal. This may indicate that while not won, the outcome did not result in the builder being held liable, which could reflect either effective public relations or a resolution before formal judgment. However, with no cases won, Shivalik Janvi Infraspesh, LLP must seek improvement to gain a more favorable standing.

Conclusion

Shivalik Janvi Infraspesh, LLP presents itself as a potential player in the Gujarat property market, but the lack of favorable legal outcomes and the nature of complaints should prompt caution among prospective buyers.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Conduct Thorough Research: Look beyond the builder’s marketing materials. Investigate their previous projects and detect any patterns in customer reviews or complaints.
2. Verify Legal Standing: Check for any ongoing or past legal cases. A clean slate may reflect positively on a builder, while a history of complaints can be a red flag.
3. Quality Assurance: Ensure that the projects adhere to quality standards. Inspect properties if possible to get a sense of their craftsmanship.
4. Consult Other Buyers: Seek testimonials from previous customers about their experience with Shivalik Janvi Infraspesh, LLP, particularly regarding post-purchase support and construction quality.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Request Documentation: Always request relevant documentation and permits related to the project. This helps verify the legitimacy of the builder.
• Evaluate Project Timelines: Inquire about the timelines for project completion. Builders with a history of delays may pose a risk for future commitments.
• Engage an Expert: Consider consulting a property expert or legal advisor before finalizing a purchase, especially in cases involving perceived risks.

In summary, while Shivalik Janvi Infraspesh, LLP may have potential projects in the pipeline, due diligence is necessary for an informed buying decision.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shivalik Janvi Infraspesh, LLP, where the builder lost, reveals several key points across the documented disputes.

The primary theme observed in these cases is related to the "Quality of Construction Disputes." This encompasses claims made by homeowners regarding poor quality construction in projects such as Shivalik Sharda Park View. Although the builder's defense in these cases was not provided, the voluntary withdrawal of the case by the complainant highlights an underlying issue that prompted legal action in the first place.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court in this theme include dissatisfaction with the final product delivered by the builder, leading to claims of subpar construction quality. Since the builder's responses were not recorded, it's challenging to pinpoint their defense strategies; however, the withdrawal of the case might indicate an attempt to negotiate or resolve the issue amicably rather than present a defense in court.

The builder lost this case not due to a court verdict but rather because the complainant voluntarily withdrew their claim. This could suggest a variety of underlying reasons - perhaps the builder offered to rectify the construction issues, or the complainant simply chose not to pursue the matter further. Whatever the case, it highlights the importance of clear communication and adequate quality assurance in construction projects to prevent disputes from escalating into legal action.