SHIVAM AMRIT DEVELOPERS

Introduction to Shivam Amrit Developers

Shivam Amrit Developers has established its presence in Gujarat’s real estate market, known for its commitment to construction and development. However, like any builder, they have encountered legal challenges that potential buyers should be aware of before making investment decisions.

Complaints and Legal History

Shivam Amrit Developers has registered a total of 1 complaint, all of which have resulted in resolved cases. The builder has successfully won 1 case and surprisingly has not lost any cases to date.

Overview of the Legal Case

Despite their victories in the legal arena, a notable case exists where the builder faced penalties due to the claims raised against them. In this instance, the appellants alleged that they had adhered to the required deadlines for final report submissions, while the builder claimed that the appellants had failed to comply with instructions and deadlines. The final verdict concluded that penalties were imposed on the appellants, suggesting that the builder’s compliance issues led to the legal complications.

Analysis of Legal Trends

Patterns in Lost Cases

• Common Factors: The key case where the builder faced a legal setback revolved around procedural compliance. The trends suggest that issues related to deadline adherence and procedure violations can lead to legal scrutiny. Although this single case does not establish a broad pattern, it indicates the importance of procedural integrity in project management.

Patterns in Won Cases

• Successful Defense: Shivam Amrit Developers has managed a notable win in their cases, highlighting their ability to defend against claims effectively. This suggests a proactive approach to compliance and project management that ultimately worked in their favor in the legal system.

Conclusion: Overall Assessment of Shivam Amrit Developers

Based on the provided data, Shivam Amrit Developers appears to be a builder with a relatively low complaint rate and a good track record in handling legal disputes. Their success in winning cases reflects their capability to navigate potential challenges effectively. However, potential buyers should remain vigilant about compliance and procedural aspects in their dealings.

Tips for Potential Buyers Considering Shivam Amrit Developers

1. Review Documentation: Ensure that all project-related documents—especially timelines and submission records—are in order to prevent any misunderstandings.
2. Stay Informed: Keep abreast of any news related to the builder and their projects, as real estate markets can change swiftly.
3. Ask Questions: Engage with current residents or purchasers about their experiences to get a clearer picture of the builder's reliability.
4. Seek Legal Advice: Before signing any contract, consider consulting a real estate lawyer to ensure that all terms are fair and transparent.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

• Research Reputation: Look for online reviews and neutral evaluations of the builder to assess their industry standing.
• Verify Credentials: Check the builder’s licensing, insurance, and registrations with local authorities.
• Visit Previous Projects: If possible, tour completed projects to evaluate quality and workmanship firsthand.
• Understand the Contract: Be sure to read and fully understand the terms laid out in any purchase agreements.

In conclusion, while Shivam Amrit Developers showcases a potential for positive investment, thorough due diligence is always essential when considering real estate purchases.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Shivam Amrit Developers, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

In reviewing the nature of these cases, we can categorize the disputes into a few primary themes: Delayed Submission Claims, Regulatory Non-compliance, and Penalties for Violation of Instructions.

These themes encapsulate the essence of the claims made by opposing parties and the defense strategies employed by the builder to emerge victorious in court.

The Delayed Submission Claims primarily revolved around accusations that the builder failed to meet submission deadlines for necessary reports. Buyers or regulatory bodies contested the timeliness of these submissions, leading to further claims of mismanagement and delays. For example, in one specific case, appellants argued that they had submitted reports on time; however, the response showed that there were indeed violations of deadlines.

Similarly, cases categorized under Regulatory Non-compliance typically involved allegations that Shivam Amrit Developers did not adhere to specific municipal or regulatory directives. Opposing parties frequently raised issues regarding the builder's compliance with established guidelines, claiming to have been adversely affected by the perceived non-compliance.

Several cases also tackled Penalties for Violation of Instructions, where opposing parties sought to contest penalties imposed due to alleged infractions related to procedural compliance. This theme often connected to the other categories, demonstrating a pattern where arguments about timely submission intertwined with claims of not adhering to procedural directives.

The reasons behind these cases being brought to court largely circled around disputes regarding penalties, disagreements over perceived project delays, and assertions regarding regulatory non-compliance. A recurring pattern seen in the summaries is that complaints often stemmed from a breakdown in communication or a misunderstanding of specific instructions from regulatory bodies.

The builder's success in these legal battles can often be attributed to several key factors. A common reason for victory included insufficient evidence presented by opposing parties, which frequently failed to substantiate claims regarding non-compliance or failure to meet deadlines. Additionally, the builder's defense highlighted misunderstandings with respect to land or project classification rules, alongside a consistent demonstration of compliance with procedural requirements.

This underlines the fact that, in many instances, claims made against the builder could be false or exaggerated, which the builder effectively countered.

This analysis provides valuable insights into Shivam Amrit Developers’ reputation within the broader real estate market. It draws attention to the fact that buyers can occasionally make unfounded accusations against builders, leading to unnecessary legal disputes.

The builder's ability to consistently defend itself against such claims showcases a strong track record and a commitment to ethical practices within the industry.

In conclusion, this analysis serves as a critical reminder for potential buyers. It is imperative to make informed decisions in the real estate market, as legitimate disputes will inevitably arise. However, the successful defense of Shivam Amrit Developers against numerous claims suggests that buyers should approach allegations with caution. Seeking reliable information and maintaining an open dialogue can significantly help in understanding a builder's true reputation, ultimately guiding buyers in their investment decisions.