CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Investing in real estate is a commitment that requires careful consideration of various factors, including the reliability of builders. In this blog post, we take a closer look at SHIVAY DEVELOPERS, a builder operating in Gujarat, to understand their track record through the lens of legal cases and complaints.
SHIVAY DEVELOPERS is a construction entity based in Gujarat. With only one recorded complaint against them, they have a unique standing in the real estate market. However, their legal history reveals that they have faced challenges in meeting regulatory obligations, specifically concerning transparency in their reporting practices.
The only recorded case involving SHIVAY DEVELOPERS was filed by the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). The authority complained about the builder's failure to submit quarterly reports regarding their projects on the RERA web portal, a crucial requirement stipulated under the RERA Act. The result was unfavorable for SHIVAY DEVELOPERS, leading to penalties imposed by the authority. This case underscores a significant lack of compliance with regulatory standards, which is crucial for ensuring buyer protection and trust.
In contrast to the lost case, there is mention of cases filed against multiple promoters where SHIVAY DEVELOPERS did not emerge victorious, as they were penalized alongside others for similar non-compliance issues. It is worth noting that while the developer did not win any cases, they also did not have any victorious outcomes, which raises concerns regarding their ethical operations and adherence to regulations.
Based on the provided data, SHIVAY DEVELOPERS has not established a strong track record in terms of compliance and legal reliability. Their single lost case reflects a concerning attitude towards regulatory obligations which potential buyers must consider seriously.
In conclusion, while SHIVAY DEVELOPERS operates within Gujarat and has encountered limited legal scrutiny, the nature of their regulatory compliance raises flags that any prospective buyer should heed with caution.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Shivay Developers that it lost reveals several key themes across the complaints made by other parties, particularly the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA).
The cases against Shivay Developers primarily cluster around three common themes: non-compliance with regulatory requirements, penalties for project delays, and disputes over project reporting. In the realm of regulatory non-compliance, the builder faced scrutiny for failing to adhere to the RERA Act and Rules, specifically concerning timely submission of quarterly project reports. This highlights a pattern where builders may face legal challenges stemming from their failure to fulfill obligations that ensure transparency and compliance within the real estate framework.
The imposition of penalties for project delays further illustrates the legal pressures builders face when they do not meet project timelines or other regulatory deadlines. Delays often trigger a chain of reactions leading to dissatisfaction among buyers and regulatory bodies, which in turn results in legal disputes. In the case of Shivay Developers, the penalties served as a direct consequence of non-compliance, indicating a systemic issue within their project management that necessitates adherence to established regulations.
Disputes over project reporting also stand out as a significant theme in the cases against Shivay Developers. The builder's defense—that they had submitted the required reports, which was contradicted by the authority's findings—illustrates a communication or operational dysfunction that can lead to legal complications. Such disputes often revolve around either genuine errors or willful non-compliance, both of which underscore the importance of diligent reporting practices in the real estate sector.
The reasons people commonly bring cases against builders like Shivay Developers include contesting penalties, disputing project delays, and disagreements over regulatory compliance. The patterns emerging from these summaries indicate that builders are often litigation-prone due to insufficient evidence to support their claims of compliance or timely project management.
The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases can be distilled into a few factors: insufficient evidence to validate their claims, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, and a general lack of adherence to legal standards in their reporting and project management practices. These factors highlight the importance for builders to prioritize compliance, transparency, and effective project management to mitigate the risk of legal disputes.