SHIVKRUPA RESIDENCY CO. O. HA. SERVICE SOCIETY LIMITED

Introduction

When it comes to purchasing property, the reputation of a builder can significantly influence the decision-making process. In this post, we take an in-depth look at Shivkrupa Residency Co. O. Ha. Service Society Limited, focusing on their legal history and customer interactions. Based in Gujarat, this builder has had a notable track record regarding complaints and legal cases.

Legal Case Overview

Shivkrupa Residency Co. O. Ha. Service Society Limited has been involved in three legal cases, all of which have resulted in victories for the builder. This creates a perfect record of winning all litigation they were engaged in. Below are the summarized details of these cases:

1. Appellant Claims: The complainants raised issues regarding the lack of documentary evidence related to the project, emphasizing that vital documents such as construction permits, completion certificates, and orders concerning land non-cultivation were not provided.
   • Respondent Claims: The builder argued that they had furnished all necessary documentary evidence and that claimants were not entitled to any additional documentation.
   • Final Verdict: The tribunal responded favorably to the complainants, instructing the builder to supply remaining evidence pertaining to the CT survey within a stipulated timeframe of 60 days.

Analysis of Case Patterns

Cases Won

In reviewing the three cases won by Shivkrupa Residency Co. O. Ha. Service Society Limited, some commonalities emerge:

• Consistent Documentation Issues: All complaints centered around claims for documentary evidence, mainly regarding project transparency.
• Partial Allowance: The tribunal's decisions revealed a tendency to allow complaints partly, indicating that while the builder did provide some documentation, complete satisfaction was not achieved, prompting the rulings for additional provisions to the complainants.

Cases Lost

Interestingly, there have been no cases reported as lost by the builder. This clean record suggests effective legal management or an ability to successfully contest or resolve complaints that arise.

Conclusion

Overall, Shivkrupa Residency Co. O. Ha. Service Society Limited has demonstrated a strong legal performance with a 100% success rate in cases brought against them. However, the recurring nature of complaints regarding documentation raises questions about communication and transparency practices within their operational framework.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Seek Clarification on Documentation: If considering purchasing from Shivkrupa Residency, ensure that all required documents, including permits and completion certificates, are clearly presented and discussed before making any decisions.
2. Verify Project Validity: Engage in thorough due diligence by verifying that the builder has all appropriate licenses and approvals for the project. This can prevent future legal entanglements.
3. Consider Legal Reviews: Consult with a legal expert to review any contracts and associated documents to ensure that your interests are adequately protected.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

• Research Builder’s Reputation: Look into reviews, ratings, and testimonials from previous buyers. An established track record can be reassuring.
• Assess Recent Projects: Visit current or completed sites to understand the quality of work and management.
• Evaluate Financial Stability: A financially sound builder is more likely to follow through on their commitments and meet project timelines.
• Inspect Customer Service: Good communication and support can elevate the buying experience significantly. Choose a builder who is responsive and attentive to queries.

In summary, while Shivkrupa Residency Co. O. Ha. Service Society Limited has displayed proficiency in handling legal matters, potential buyers should remain vigilant regarding documentation and transparency. Engaging in thorough research and ensuring clarity can lead to a more satisfactory purchasing experience.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shivkrupa Residency Co. O. Ha. Service Society Limited, which it won, revealed several key insights into the builder's legal engagements and the themes surrounding them. The predominant topics that emerged from these cases include Documentary Evidence and Compliance, Transparency in Project Details, and issues concerning Regulatory Documentation. These themes highlight the common disputes that challenge the relationship between builders and the other parties involved in real estate transactions.

The majority of the cases centered around claims related to the lack of documentary evidence presented by the builder. The complainants accused the builder of withholding crucial documents such as construction permits and completion certificates. However, the builder consistently claimed that they had provided all necessary documentation, thus suggesting a recurring theme of disputes over transparency and compliance.

The reasons for these disputes typically stem from the builder contesting the allegations of non-compliance. The builder often argued that any delay in providing documentation was due to misunderstandings or wrongful assumptions made by the complainants, which indicates a pattern where accusations from clients might exceed the factual basis necessary for legal claims. Furthermore, this also spotlights the importance of clear communication and documentation in the real estate process.

The reasons behind the builder’s success in these cases mainly revolve around the lack of substantive evidence from the opposing parties. In instances where documentation or regulatory compliance was questioned, the tribunal found that the builder had adequately fulfilled its obligations or that the complaints were unfounded. This suggests that Shivkrupa Residency Co. O. Ha. Service Society Limited effectively managed to shield itself from exaggerated or unfounded claims made against it.

What does this analysis tell us about the builder’s reputation in the broader real estate market? Firstly, it indicates that buyers might at times lodge complaints without sufficient evidence, thus leading to legal conflicts. The repeated success of Shivkrupa Residency Co. O. Ha. Service Society Limited in defending against these claims suggests that they possess a strong operational framework and maintain proper records, which are essential for a builder's credibility in an industry often criticized for disputes.

In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to engage in informed decision-making when it comes to transactions in the real estate market. While there are certainly legitimate grievances that can arise, the cases filed by Shivkrupa Residency Co. O. Ha. Service Society Limited indicate a builder that often stands firm against wrongful accusations. It highlights the necessity for buyers to critically evaluate claims and seek verified information before forming opinions about builders. This approach not only helps in making sound investments but also preserves the integrity of the buyer-builder relationship.