| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to finding a reputable builder for real estate investments, it’s crucial to consider the builder’s track record. SHIVSHAKTI DEVELOPERS, a prominent player in the Gujarat real estate market, has had a fluctuating performance in the legal arena, which potential buyers should understand. This blog post will delve into the builder's legal history, offering insights into their performance and valuable tips for prospective buyers.
Legal Case Overview
SHIVSHAKTI DEVELOPERS has faced one legal complaint. The details of this case shine a light on the builder’s adherence to regulations and their approach to legal challenges.
- Case Summary: The legal complaint centered on allegations that SHIVSHAKTI DEVELOPERS violated the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Specifically, the appellant claimed that the builder failed to mention the RERA registration number and website in their sales advertisements. The response from SHIVSHAKTI DEVELOPERS acknowledged that while they did …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Shivshakti Developers, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around two critical topics: regulatory non-compliance and penalties for project delays.
In terms of regulatory non-compliance, the most notable case involved the builder's violation of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Specifically, the appellant claimed that the builder failed to mention the required RERA registration number and RERA website in advertisements for the project. This highlights a pattern where builders may not adhere to regulatory requirements, potentially misleading buyers and necessitating legal action.
The common reasons people brought cases to court largely centered around contesting penalties imposed for non-compliance, as seen in the aforementioned case. The builder admitted to the violation but argued for a reduction in penalty, indicating a degree of acknowledgment about the risks associated with non-compliance. However, the Authority ruled against this, …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!