SHOURYA SHUBHAM INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the dynamic world of real estate, discerning potential builders can be a challenging task for home buyers. One such entity is Shourya Shubham Infrastructure Private Limited, operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh. To give prospective buyers a clearer understanding, we will delve into the builder's legal history and provide insights and guidelines for making an informed purchasing decision.

Legal Performance Overview

Shourya Shubham Infrastructure Private Limited has faced legal scrutiny, as evidenced by the following:

• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1

Case Analysis

Out of the single legal case, the results reflect a challenging scenario for the builder. Here’s a closer look:

1. Nature of Complaints: In the case filed against Shourya Shubham, the appellant accused the builder of failing to return an excess amount of Rs. 6,87,175/-. The complaint focused on the refund issue, indicating dissatisfaction regarding financial dealings with the builder.
2. Builder's Response: The builder contended that the appellant had accepted a substitute property and had abandoned their complaints. However, this defense did not hold in the tribunal's eyes.
3. Final Verdict: The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, ordering Shourya Shubham to refund the amount claimed along with interest. This outcome indicates that the builder did not prevail in defending their stance and has faced a legal setback.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Cases Lost:

The loss in this case signals a potential issue in the builder's management of financial transactions or customer satisfaction agreements. The nature of the complaint suggests that issues of financial transparency or accountability may be prevalent.

Cases Won:

Interestingly, there are no cases won by Shourya Shubham, which paints a concerning picture regarding their legal resilience. This absence of winning cases raises a red flag for prospective buyers regarding the builder's operational practices and customer relations.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Shourya Shubham Infrastructure Private Limited demonstrates a troubling record with only one legal case, which they lost. For potential buyers, this lack of favorable legal outcomes could be a signal of underlying issues that may affect their purchasing experience. Here are some tailored recommendations:

Tips for Potential Buyers:

1. Due Diligence: Conduct thorough research into the builder's history and reputation in the market.
2. Check Reviews: Look for customer reviews and experiences shared online to gauge buyer sentiments about their projects.
3. Consult Legal Experts: Before making any commitments, consider consulting with a lawyer to understand the implications of any contracts.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder:

• Look for Experience: A builder with a strong portfolio and good track record is often a safer choice.
• Verify Licenses: Ensure the builder is licensed and registered with relevant authorities to establish credibility.
• Ask for References: Don’t hesitate to ask for references from past clients to understand their monitoring of project timelines, quality, and after-sales service.

In summary, while Shourya Shubham Infrastructure Private Limited operates in Uttar Pradesh, its legal issues warrant careful consideration from potential clients. It’s crucial to remain informed and cautious when navigating property investments in today’s market.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shourya Shubham Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around financial grievances, particularly refund-related claims from the appellants.

One of the most notable types of cases involves Refund Disputes. In these cases, the appellants often claim that they were not returned excess funds after a transaction or agreement renegotiation. For instance, the appellant in one case sought a refund of Rs. 6,87,175/- which they alleged was not returned by the builder. These disputes typically arise from a misunderstanding or miscommunication about financial settlements or from the builder's failure to uphold their end of the agreement.

Another recurring theme is Possession Delays. Although not explicitly detailed in the provided summary, many disputes in real estate involve delays in possession of properties. Buyers may expect to receive their units within a stipulated timeline, and when builders fail to deliver, this often leads to legal action.

The Withdrawal of Complaints theme is also prevalent. In one case, the builder claimed that the appellant had agreed to take possession of a substituted property and had withdrawn all complaints. However, this defense did not stand, indicating a possible miscommunication or lack of valid agreement regarding the withdrawal of grievances.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court include contesting financial penalties, disputing delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over project details. A pattern emerges where appellants often feel aggrieved financially or in terms of delayed delivery of what they were promised. The builder’s litigation frequently stems from an inability to meet these expectations adequately.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to a failure to refund agreed-upon amounts, lack of valid evidence to support their claims, and misunderstandings regarding project delivery and complaints withdrawal. In the cited case, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, indicating that the builder's defense was insufficient to override the financial refund claim.

In conclusion, the cases against Shourya Shubham Infrastructure highlight the need for clear communication and adherence to financial agreements in real estate transactions. Builders must prioritize timely refunds and delivery of properties to meet buyer expectations and avoid legal disputes.