SHRADDHA INFRA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Shraddha Infra Estate Private Limited is a real estate builder operating primarily in Chhattisgarh. Like many builders, it has its share of legal disputes, which can be a significant consideration for potential buyers. In this post, we will explore the builder's track record with complaints and legal cases, and provide insights for those contemplating a purchase.

Builder Overview

• Name: Shraddha Infra Estate Private Limited
• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1
• States with Projects: Chhattisgarh

Legal Case Insights

Case Details

In the single legal case involving Shraddha Infra Estate, the appellant claimed that the builder failed to submit mandatory documents for project registration. The builder's defense asserted that the necessary documents were submitted, but the appellant did not verify them. Ultimately, the court accepted the appellant's claim, resulting in the rejection of the builder's application for registration.

Analysis of Patterns

1. Cases Lost:
   
   - The only case lost by Shraddha Infra Estate was centered around administrative compliance—specifically, the submission of mandatory registration documents. This suggests a potential area of concern in terms of operational practices within the company, highlighting the importance of thorough documentation.
2. Cases Won:
   
   - Notably, the builder has not won any cases. Thus, there is a lack of legal victories in their history, which can raise red flags regarding the builder's overall reliability and compliance with regulatory standards.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Shraddha Infra Estate Private Limited shows a troubling trend regarding legal challenges, specifically with document compliance affecting their operational credibility. The sole complaint has resulted in a loss, which could suggest vulnerabilities in their project management and adherence to legal requirements.

Tips for Potential Buyers

For individuals considering purchasing from Shraddha Infra Estate or any builder, it is vital to:

1. Investigate Builder's Reputation: Research the builder's history with complaints and legal issues. An absence of victories in legal matters can be a red flag.
2. Review Documentation: Ensure all necessary documentation regarding property and project registrations are available and verified before making any commitments.
3. Seek Customer Reviews: Look for reviews and feedback from previous buyers regarding their experiences and satisfaction with the builder’s services.
4. Consult Legal Advisors: Before finalizing any deal, consult with a legal advisor to better understand your rights as a buyer and any potential risks.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Check Licensing and Registration: Ensure the builder is licensed and registered with the appropriate local authorities, which can help protect your investment.
2. Assess Project Quality: Visit existing projects to evaluate the quality of construction and amenities offered.
3. Financial Stability: Verify that the builder has sound financial standing to complete the projects without delays.
4. Future Development Plans: Understand the builder’s vision and future developments in the area to assess property value prospects.

In summary, while Shraddha Infra Estate has some operational presence in Chhattisgarh, potential buyers should approach with caution, taking into consideration the company's history of legal challenges and the importance of thorough due diligence.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shraddha Infra Estate Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around two critical areas: regulatory compliance disputes and documentation submissions.

In terms of regulatory compliance, the builder faced challenges that could be categorized as non-compliance with mandatory project registration requirements. The appellant claimed that the builder had failed to submit the necessary documents to register their project, which is critical for transparency and adherence to legal standards in real estate development. This highlights a pattern where builders may face scrutiny not only from regulatory bodies but also from customers or investors who expect compliance with legal frameworks.

The documentation submission disputes revolve around the builder's claim that they had indeed submitted the required documents, whereas the appellant contested this, stating that either the documents were not received or not verified. This indicates a significant communication gap or a potential systemic issue in handling critical project documentation, which could lead to misunderstandings and disputes, particularly if there are no clear protocols for submission and verification.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court in these instances include contesting the builder's adherence to regulatory requirements and disputing the adequacy of their documentation. People may feel compelled to take legal action if they believe that a builder's non-compliance could potentially affect the integrity of the project or their investments.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence supporting their claims of compliant documentation submission. This underscores the importance for builders to maintain thorough records and ensure proper communication with relevant parties throughout the development process.

In conclusion, while the cases against Shraddha Infra Estate Private Limited are limited, they reveal critical insights into the broader issues faced by builders, particularly concerning regulatory compliance and documentation practices. Addressing these can help prevent disputes and improve the overall credibility of builders in the real estate market.