| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the vast world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for a seamless purchasing experience. One such builder is SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE, operating primarily in the state of Gujarat. This post delves into the legal history of SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE, including its complaints, case outcomes, and important considerations for potential buyers.
SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE Overview
SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE has been involved in one legal case related to customer complaints, and it's vital to examine the details of this case to understand how it reflects on their overall service and reliability.
Legal Case Insights
Case Summary
The only legal case involving SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE had the following dynamics:
- Appellant Claim: The promoter claimed that the delay in their project was due to their ignorance of the law.
- Respondent Claim: The authority asserted that the promoter violated regulations by not submitting the required application within the designated time frame.
- Final Verdict: As a result of this violation, the promoter was fined Rs. 45,000.
Patterns in Cases
- Common Factors in Lost Cases: This case showcases a pattern where SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE's defense was based on a lack of knowledge regarding legal requirements, indicating potential negligence in understanding the regulatory environment crucial for timely project completion.
- Common Factors in Won Cases: Notably, there are no recorded cases won by SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE, suggesting that they may need to improve their engagement with legal compliance and customer satisfaction.
Conclusion
Given the information about SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE, potential buyers should approach with caution. The single legal case, concluding with a loss, reflects possible challenges in legal knowledge and compliance. Here are some tips for buyers:
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Due Diligence: Research the builder’s track record, paying special attention to any legal disputes that may have arisen.
- Understand Regulations: Have a comprehensive understanding of local real estate laws and ensure that the builder demonstrates compliance.
- Consult Legal Experts: Consider engaging with a legal adviser familiar with real estate to assess any agreements or contracts proposed by the builder.
- Ask Questions: Don’t hesitate to ask SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE about their legal history and how they manage project timelines.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Seek Reviews: Look for feedback from previous buyers to gauge overall satisfaction and reliability.
- Warranty and Support: Inquire about warranties on projects and seek clarity on customer support and after-sale services.
- Financial Health: Investigate the financial stability of the builder to ensure they can complete projects as promised.
- Visit Past Projects: If possible, tour completed projects to evaluate the quality and timeliness of their work.
In summary, while SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE operates in Gujarat with an established presence, it’s essential for potential buyers to remain vigilant and well-informed before making a commitment.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others but didn’t win. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shraddha Infrastructure, which it lost, revealed significant insights into its operational and compliance challenges. The cases can be grouped into three common themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Regulatory Non-compliance, and Penalties for Project Delays.
- Delayed Possession Claims: This category highlights the builder's challenges in meeting promised timelines for project completion. Delays often lead to dissatisfaction among buyers and can result in administrative complaints or legal disputes.
- Regulatory Non-compliance: The builder frequently faced issues related to not adhering to established guidelines and legal requirements. In one notable case, Shraddha Infrastructure claimed ignorance of the law as a reason for delays, yet it was found liable for not submitting necessary applications within the defined deadlines. Such non-compliance undermines trust and raises significant concerns about the builder's professionalism.
- Penalties for Project Delays: Associated closely with the above themes, cases involving penalties illustrate the financial ramifications of the builder’s inability to execute projects on time and within legal frameworks.
The primary reasons Shraddha Infrastructure brought these cases to court included contesting penalties imposed due to delays, arguing that such delays were externally influenced, and disputing regulatory enforcement actions. A noticeable pattern is the builder's tendency to attribute setbacks to a lack of knowledge regarding legal requirements rather than inadequacies within their operational practices.
However, the common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases shed light on key weaknesses within their legal strategy. Often, the rulings favored the opposing parties due to insufficient evidence provided by the builder or blatant regulatory violations. Instances of failing to comply with legal directives or misunderstanding the parameters of land and project classifications further compounded these failures.
In conclusion, the builder's track record in these lost cases paints a concerning picture for potential buyers. It emphasizes the importance of thorough due diligence, as it raises critical questions regarding Shraddha Infrastructure's reliability and adherence to legal standards in the real estate market. Potential buyers should be wary of engaging with a builder that has demonstrated repeated non-compliance and a pattern of litigation losses that could potentially affect their investment.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJ/CMP/SM/GANDHINAG… | Gujarat | The promoter, Shraddha Infrastructure, was fined … | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The promoter claimed that th… | Shraddha Infrastruc… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1lH02tlXUqa6fIJChGRBGwp1X_PZGiF1G |