SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE logo

SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the vast world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for a seamless purchasing experience. One such builder is SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE, operating primarily in the state of Gujarat. This post delves into the legal history of SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE, including its complaints, case outcomes, and important considerations for potential buyers.

SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE Overview

SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE has been involved in one legal case related to customer complaints, and it's vital to examine the details of this case to understand how it reflects on their overall service and reliability.

Legal Case Insights

Case Summary

The only legal case involving SHRADDHA INFRASTRUCTURE had the following dynamics:

  • Appellant Claim: The promoter claimed that the delay in their project was due to their ignorance of the law.
  • Respondent Claim: The authority asserted that the promoter violated regulations by not submitting the required application within the designated time frame.
  • Final Verdict: As a …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Regulatory Non-compliance Penalties for Project Delays

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shraddha Infrastructure, which it lost, revealed significant insights into its operational and compliance challenges. The cases can be grouped into three common themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Regulatory Non-compliance, and Penalties for Project Delays.

  1. Delayed Possession Claims: This category highlights the builder's challenges in meeting promised timelines for project completion. Delays often lead to dissatisfaction among buyers and can result in administrative complaints or legal disputes.
  2. Regulatory Non-compliance: The builder frequently faced issues related to not adhering to established guidelines and legal requirements. In one notable case, Shraddha Infrastructure claimed ignorance of the law as a reason for delays, yet it was found liable for not submitting necessary applications within the defined deadlines. Such non-compliance undermines trust and raises significant concerns about the builder's professionalism.
  3. Penalties for Project Delays: Associated closely with the above themes, cases involving penalties illustrate …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review