SHREE BAGHEL CONSTRUCTION

Assessing Shree Baghel Construction: A Closer Look at Performance and Buyer Considerations

When it comes to choosing a builder for real estate projects, potential buyers must exercise caution and look into various aspects of a builder's credibility and past performance. This blog post focuses on Shree Baghel Construction, a builder operating in Gujarat, analyzing their track record based on legal cases and complaints.

Overview of Shree Baghel Construction

Shree Baghel Construction has generated some attention with reports of legal complaints. With only one complaint filed against them, it's clear that the volume of legal issues is relatively low. However, examining the details of this complaint sheds light on the builder's professional practices.

Legal Case Analysis

Shree Baghel Construction has faced a total of two legal cases. Let's break them down for clarity:

1. Cases Won: 0
2. Cases Lost: 1

Case Breakdown

The sole case against Shree Baghel Construction involved the failure to submit an annual audit report for their project, 'Shivkrupa Residency.'

• Appellant Claim: The appellant claimed that the builder had not submitted the required report within the stipulated timeframe.
• Respondent Claim: The builder argued that unforeseen circumstances led to the delay in submission.
• Final Verdict: The authority fined Shree Baghel Construction Rs. 5,000 and mandated the submission of the report within 30 days.

Patterns in Cases Lost

The analysis shows a pattern of lapses in adhering to timely submissions and compliance requirements in the single case lost. It indicates potential organizational or procedural weaknesses in the management of projects, which could cause delays or miscommunication concerning essential documentation.

Patterns in Cases Won

As there are no cases won, this raises a concern regarding the builder’s ability to successfully defend their actions in legal matters. Their unsuccessful defense against the claims could point to a lack of robust processes that ensure compliance with legal and regulatory standards, which ultimately undermines buyer confidence.

Conclusion: Assessing Shree Baghel Construction

Based on the information gathered, Shree Baghel Construction displays a concerning profile. With only one complaint filed being lost without any successful defenses, potential buyers might want to exercise caution when considering their projects. It's essential to ensure that any builder has a strong track record, not only in delivering projects but also in adhering to regulatory and compliance requirements.

Tips for Potential Buyers:

If considering a purchase from Shree Baghel Construction, keep the following tips in mind:

• Conduct a Thorough Research: Investigate further into their project history, customer reviews, and any substantial complaints beyond what is available in public forums.
• Seek Previous Buyer Feedback: Connect with existing or past buyers to understand their experiences regarding quality, compliance, and customer service.
• Confirm Documentation: Ensure that all necessary legal documents pertaining to the project are in order and ask for verification of compliance with regulatory requirements.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

Regardless of your choice, these universal tips can help any buyer make an informed decision:

• Review Legal History: Look into any legal disputes the builder has faced, assessing how they were managed.
• Check Credentials: Ensure that the builder has all required licenses and certifications to operate in your area.
• Evaluate Financial Stability: A builder’s financial health can impact project completion; thus, it’s wise to investigate their standing in the industry.
• Inspect Previous Projects: Visit developments previously constructed by the builder to evaluate the quality and satisfaction of earlier clients.

In conclusion, while Shree Baghel Construction may present as a potential option for homeowners in Gujarat, a cautious approach and rigorous analysis of their past performance are essential before making any commitments.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Baghel Construction, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight key issues such as non-compliance with regulatory requirements, penalties incurred for project delays, and disputes primarily centered around documentation and reporting obligations.

In the case of non-compliance, the builder faced legal action for failing to submit the annual audit report for the 'Shivkrupa Residency' project within the stipulated timeframe. This reflects a broader pattern of accountability, wherein builders are legally required to maintain transparency through timely reporting. The common trigger in this instance was the builder's failure to adhere to established deadlines, leading to a direct confrontation with regulatory authorities.

The reasons people brought cases to court primarily revolved around contesting penalties and the builder's defense of unforeseen circumstances. This pattern indicates a frequent point of contention, where builders often attribute delays to factors outside their control, only to find themselves at odds with the authorities who may view such defenses as insufficient.

The conclusion of these cases typically hinged on the builder's inability to meet regulatory standards or fulfill their reporting duties. In the cited case, the builder was fined and ordered to submit the overdue report, underscoring the legal expectation for compliance. These outcomes suggest that builders are likely to lose cases when they cannot provide valid reasons for non-compliance or delay, or when they fail to follow established rules and regulations governing real estate projects.