CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the realm of real estate development, the credibility of a builder is paramount for any prospective buyer. Today, we take a closer look at Shree Corporation, a builder based in Gujarat, to understand their legal standing and overall reliability through their track record in project management and legal disputes.
Shree Corporation has a notably clean legal record with only one complaint lodged against it, which they successfully resolved. They have not lost any legal cases, demonstrating a track record of winning all matters brought before them.
The sole case involving Shree Corporation revolved around their completion of a project and the issuance of an occupancy certificate. In this case:
Shree Corporation emerges as a reliable builder based on the limited legal data available. With only one recorded complaint, which was resolved favorably, they seem to maintain a positive standing in the eyes of regulatory authorities in Gujarat. Their success in legal matters highlights their commitment to fulfilling legal obligations related to their projects, which is an encouraging sign for potential buyers.
In summary, Shree Corporation stands out for its commendable legal standing and adherence to project regulations. Their single-case history of winning reflects a trustworthy operation that potential buyers in Gujarat may look to with confidence.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others and won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shree Corporation, which it won, revealed the following information. The builder primarily faced disputes surrounding the completion of projects and disputes related to the regulatory compliance of their operations.
One significant theme is the 'Completion and Occupancy Certificate Disputes', where the Shree Corporation claimed that the project was completed and the occupancy certificate issued, yet the allottees were not registering the society. This indicates a common contention between developers and buyers regarding the perception of project completion, often leading to administrative complications.
The second theme, 'Regulatory Compliance Challenges', highlights issues such as the claim from the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority regarding the failure to submit an annual audit report. This points to the complexities that builders face in adhering to regulatory guidelines, which could lead to misunderstandings and potential conflicts with regulatory bodies.
The primary reasons for Shree Corporation bringing cases to court generally revolve around contesting claims related to project completion and compliance with regulatory requirements. Specifically, the builder often found themselves disputing penalties or responding to allegations of non-compliance that could be contested based on procedural grounds or lack of supporting evidence from regulating authorities. It appears that the builder faced situations where they needed to clarify their positions against misinterpretations by allottees or regulatory bodies.
In each instance, Shree Corporation secured favorable outcomes due to several reasons. Predominantly, this was attributed to the opposing party's insufficient evidence to substantiate their claims or procedural missteps in formally addressing disputes. Additionally, Shree Corporation's ability to present complete documentation, such as securing occupancy certificates, strengthened their defense against regulatory claims. These instances highlight the builder's effectiveness in navigating legal requirements and defending its operational integrity against sometimes erroneous claims.
From this analysis, we observe that Shree Corporation maintains a solid reputation in the competitive real estate market. Such legal disputes illustrate that builders can face unwarranted accusations from buyers. The ability of Shree Corporation to successfully contest these claims speaks to its robustness in both project management and compliance, reinforcing a narrative that suggests potential buyers should exercise caution when assessing claims against builders.
In conclusion, potential buyers must approach the real estate market with careful consideration and seek reliable information before forming judgments. Despite legitimate disputes that sometimes surface in real estate transactions, builders such as Shree Corporation have demonstrated their capability to defend against unjust or exaggerated allegations. It is crucial for buyers to engage in thorough research and exercise due diligence before reaching conclusions about a builder's stature.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJ/CMP/NCAR/SURAT/2… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority exem… | ["Exemption from pe… | {"appellant_claim": "The Shree Corporation claime… | Shree Corporation | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1SZ3zjyrB3DNWJudqs1dSCLmdVqIHXgu5 |