SHREE GOVIND REAL STRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

When considering property investments, particularly in the real estate market, it's essential to assess the builders involved. One such entity is Shree Govind Real Structure Private Limited, a builder operating in the state of Rajasthan. This blog post provides a detailed overview of the builder, including their track record in legal cases, the nature of complaints filed against them, and insights into their operational practices.

Overview of Legal Complaints

Shree Govind Real Structure Private Limited has recorded a total of 4 complaints against them. Of these complaints, they have won 1 case and lost 3 cases. Analyzing these outcomes can provide potential buyers with valuable insights into the builder’s practices and reliability.

Patterns in Lost Cases

Examining the 3 cases that resulted in losses for the builder reveals some common factors:

1. Non-Compliance with Procedures: One of the lost cases stemmed from a complaint that was dismissed due to the complainant not following the prescribed procedures for filing. This highlights a potential issue with how disputes are managed and may point to a lack of proper guidance offered by the builder to the customers.
2. Lack of Response: In the other cases where the builder lost, the common theme was the failure to address the claims. The builder did not appear in hearings or provide responses to the allegations made against them, leading to unfavorable judgments.
3. Customer Frustration: The allegations involved non-delivery of possessions and lack of project registration, which indicates a pattern of customer dissatisfaction regarding project completion and formalization.

Patterns in Won Cases

On the other hand, the 2 cases that Shree Govind Real Structure Private Limited won can provide insight into what works in their favor:

1. Regulatory Compliance: In the cases they won, the authority imposed penalties on the builder, necessitating compliance with registration and project execution requirements. This showcases that when the builder is compelled to adhere to regulations, they may ultimately deliver.
2. Customer Accountability: One claim against the builder was dismissed due to the complainant not executing necessary legal documentation, which emphasizes the importance of buyers understanding their responsibilities in property transactions.
3. Authority Intervention: These cases were marked by clear benchmarks set by regulatory bodies, which required the builder to act within specific timelines, highlighting that oversight can bolster accountability.

Conclusion

The assessment of Shree Govind Real Structure Private Limited presents a mixed picture. While the company has succeeded in some legal challenges, the number of complaints and lost cases raises potential red flags for prospective buyers. Here are some tips for buyers considering Shree Govind Real Structure or any builder:

Tips for Potential Buyers:

1. Thorough Research: Investigate the builder's past projects and customer reviews. Use available resources to gather insights into the builder’s reputation.
2. Request Documentation: Always ask for project-related documents, including registration papers, payment receipts, and timelines. This ensures transparency.
3. Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with the legal procedures for filing complaints and follow them diligently, as non-compliance could hinder your case.
4. Engage Legal Help: Consider consulting with a legal expert to navigate contract details and understand your rights and obligations as a buyer.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder:

1. Check for Licenses and Certifications: Ensure the builder is legally registered and has the necessary permissions to operate.
2. Assess Financial Stability: A builder’s financial health can impact project completion. Research their financial history and project funding capabilities.
3. Get References: Seek opinions from previous buyers to understand their experiences and satisfaction levels with the builder's service.
4. Visit Ongoing Projects: If possible, visit other projects the builder is working on or has completed to see the quality of construction firsthand.

In summary, while Shree Govind Real Structure Private Limited has shown capacity for compliance under certain circumstances, potential buyers should approach with caution and conduct thorough due diligence before making a purchase.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Govind Real Structure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the recurring themes surrounding their disputes.

The cases highlight two main themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Failure to Register Projects and Execute Conveyance Deeds. In each instance, the complainants alleged that despite having made full payments for their plots, the builder failed to deliver possession and did not formally register the projects or execute the necessary conveyance deeds. This points to an troubling pattern of incomplete transactions and a lack of follow-through on contractual obligations by the builder.

A common reason for litigation in these cases was the builder's Non-Compliance with Authority Directives. After the complaints were filed, the builder faced penalties for not adhering to the requirements set forth by the Authority, which further aggravated their legal position. The builder’s defense often revolved around claims of other parties' constructions being completed and the execution of sale deeds, yet this did not mitigate their accountability for project registration and conveyance execution.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to their Failure to Respond Adequately and Non-Compliance with Legal Requirements. In one significant case, the builder did not appear before the Authority at all, leading to a default judgment against them. Even when they did respond, the builder's claims did not address the core issues of project registration and conveyance execution, resulting in decisions against them.

Overall, these case outcomes indicate a concerning trend in how Shree Govind Real Structure Private Limited conducts its business. Buyers should be wary of these patterns and thoroughly investigate a builder’s legal history and compliance with regulatory requirements before making a purchase.

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Shree Govind Real Structure Private Limited, which it lost, reveals several interesting insights into their litigation history. Most notably, the cases have typically revolved around issues that often arise in the complex domain of real estate.

In this instance, the primary theme grouping the disputes appears to focus on 'Settlement Agreements'. The builder's disputes seem to primarily conclude with the parties reaching a financial settlement, indicating a common trend where litigation may not have been fully pursued to its legal conclusion. In the lone case summary, it highlights how an appeal was conclusive due to a settlement, and the builder was ordered to pay costs to the respondent. This suggests that many of the builder's legal challenges often end up not in favorable judgments but in negotiated resolutions, pointing to the importance of settlement in this builder's strategy for dispute resolution.

The builder likely pursued cases to contest financial penalties or costs applied against them. Given the insufficient elaboration on specific claims, it can be inferred that the builder may have been contesting liabilities and attempting to mitigate what they perceived as unfair financial demands levied by respondents. The absence of detailed claims can suggest that these disputes were often settled before they could lead to protracted court battles, potentially to avoid reputational damage associated with ongoing litigation.

However, the builder lost in these disputes indicates certain common pitfalls. Firstly, the outcomes may stem from insufficient evidence to support their claims or defenses in court. The lack of elaboration on the specific grounds of appeal implies that the builder may not have had robust legal or factual justifications for their positions. Secondly, there may be non-compliance with existing legal standards or insufficient adherence to regulatory guidelines pertinent to their projects. In the case of real estate, having a strong understanding of land use laws and municipal directives is crucial, and any lapses on the builder's part could result in adverse judgments. As such, it emphasizes the need for builders not only to have solid construction plans but also to abide strictly by legal frameworks governing their operations. Overall, while settlements may appear an expedient solution, they may also signify challenges in building a strong legal foundation, which can ultimately contribute to repeated litigation and financial liabilities.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Shree Govind Real Structure Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around procedural non-compliance, where complainants failed to follow proper legal protocols during consultations or disputes. More specifically, one particular case involved a complaint submitted on paper without adhering to the requirement of online filing or deposition of the complaint fee. This demonstrates a clear instance of procedural non-compliance that led to the dismissal of the case in favor of the builder.

The reasons behind these complaints often stemmed from buyers' perceptions of wrongful actions by the builder—such as penalties for project delays or misunderstandings related to land classification. However, the patterns emerging from the analysis show that a significant number of claims lacked adequate evidence or were filed based on incorrect assumptions regarding procedures.

The common reasons for the builder's success in these cases can be attributed to the inability of the complainants to substantiate their claims with required evidence or compliance with regulations. For instance, in the highlighted case, the respondent was not a party to the complaint since the opposing party failed to file properly according to established protocols. Such procedural errors significantly aid builders in defending themselves effectively, revealing that some complaints are grounded in false or exaggerated narratives.

This analysis sheds light on Shree Govind Real Structure Private Limited's reputation, indicating a builder equipped with a strong legal foundation to address and refute unjust claims. It serves as a reminder that while there are certainly legitimate disputes within the real estate sector, there is also a tendency for buyers to make incorrect accusations which can lead to needless legal disputes.

In conclusion, this analysis highlights the importance of informed decision-making for potential buyers. While legitimate issues can arise, the outcomes of these cases suggest that builders like Shree Govind Real Structure Private Limited have a solid track record of defending themselves against unjust accusations. Future buyers are advised to approach claims with discernment and seek credible information, enhancing the possibility of positive and fair transactions in the real estate market.