CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When it comes to investing in real estate, potential buyers must conduct thorough research to ensure that they are making a sound investment. One such builder that has come into the spotlight is Shree Hari Developers, based in Gujarat. With a notable record of complaints and legal cases, it's crucial to take an in-depth look at their operations and what prospective homeowners should consider.
Shree Hari Developers is a real estate builder operating exclusively in the state of Gujarat. Unfortunately, the company has faced scrutiny due to ongoing legal challenges, with a total of 4 complaints filed against them, all of which resulted in losses for the builder. This track record raises pertinent questions about the reliability and accountability of the developer.
Examining the details of the cases filed against Shree Hari Developers reveals some specific trends:
In conclusion, the record of Shree Hari Developers—to have 4 complaints filed against them and losing all 4 cases—paints a concerning picture for potential buyers. The blatant disregard for regulatory obligations raises alarms about the reliability of the builder. Those considering purchasing a property from Shree Hari Developers should approach with caution, as the builder's history indicates a pattern of non-compliance and legal troubles.
Navigating the real estate market requires vigilance and awareness. Shree Hari Developers may offer opportunities, but potential buyers should weigh the risks carefully against their histories of compliance and customer satisfaction.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Hari Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints lodged against them. The primary disputes can be categorized into three main topics: Non-compliance with RERA Reporting, Penalties for Delayed Submissions, and Withdrawal of Complaints.
The cases often revolved around Shree Hari Developers' failure to adhere to the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) guidelines, specifically concerning the timely submission of quarterly project reports. This non-compliance resulted in legal actions, with the authority imposing penalties on the builder for violating the RERA Act and Rules. For instance, in one case, the builder was fined Rs. 25,000 for not submitting the required reports on time for their project 'Shree Hari Palace.'
A common reason for these complaints was the builder's defense that they did not intentionally fail to submit reports; however, this defense did not resonate with the regulatory authority. The builder attributed their delay to being busy with other matters, which highlights a pattern of insufficient prioritization of legal and regulatory requirements. This factor was crucial in the verdicts against the builder, as it reflected a broader trend of neglecting compliance responsibilities.
Additionally, there were cases where the complaints were withdrawn by the complainants, leading to a disposition without a verdict. The reasons for these withdrawals were not provided in the summaries; however, they could potentially indicate cases where the issues were resolved amicably or where the complainants did not pursue their claims further due to various reasons.
In conclusion, the analysis shows that Shree Hari Developers faced legal challenges primarily due to their failure to comply with RERA reporting requirements. The builder's consistent attribution of delays to external factors rather than taking responsibility for their actions, along with a pattern of non-compliance, led to the verdicts against them. Buyers should consider these factors when evaluating the reliability and accountability of builders in the real estate market.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMP/Ahmedabad/23081… | Gujarat | The complaint was withdrawn by the complainant, M… | ["Withdrawal of com… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Mr. Kiran Daave | Shree Hari Developm… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1x6fZBuAOGfjOFEkS6bixaYGaOCaUqh6P |
GJ/CMP/NCQR/SURAT/2… | Gujarat | Shree Hari Developers failed to submit quarterly … | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that S… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Shree Hari Develope… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1ZKTJdRQsYIaXQYFRKcbJ4DqZtMv58Wp2 |