| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to investing in real estate, potential buyers must conduct thorough research to ensure that they are making a sound investment. One such builder that has come into the spotlight is Shree Hari Developers, based in Gujarat. With a notable record of complaints and legal cases, it's crucial to take an in-depth look at their operations and what prospective homeowners should consider.
Overview of Shree Hari Developers
Shree Hari Developers is a real estate builder operating exclusively in the state of Gujarat. Unfortunately, the company has faced scrutiny due to ongoing legal challenges, with a total of 4 complaints filed against them, all of which resulted in losses for the builder. This track record raises pertinent questions about the reliability and accountability of the developer.
Legal Case Breakdown
Examining the details of the cases filed against Shree Hari Developers reveals some specific trends:
Cases Won
- Gujarat Real …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Hari Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints lodged against them. The primary disputes can be categorized into three main topics: Non-compliance with RERA Reporting, Penalties for Delayed Submissions, and Withdrawal of Complaints.
The cases often revolved around Shree Hari Developers' failure to adhere to the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) guidelines, specifically concerning the timely submission of quarterly project reports. This non-compliance resulted in legal actions, with the authority imposing penalties on the builder for violating the RERA Act and Rules. For instance, in one case, the builder was fined Rs. 25,000 for not submitting the required reports on time for their project 'Shree Hari Palace.'
A common reason for these complaints was the builder's defense that they did not intentionally fail to submit reports; however, this defense did not resonate with the regulatory …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!