SHREE JAGANNATH ROYAL BUILDER

Overview of Shree Jagannath Royal Builder

Shree Jagannath Royal Builder, based in Odisha, is a notable player in the real estate sector, yet their journey has been marred by legal challenges. With a total of two complaints lodged against them, this builder has faced significant scrutiny regarding their service delivery and contractual obligations.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Lost

Shree Jagannath Royal Builder has experienced an unsavory track record in their legal confrontations, having lost both cases brought against them. The common factor in these lost cases revolves around issues of contractual compliance and the delivery of promised services:

1. In the first case, a complainant alleged that they paid the full amount for a flat but were not provided the property. The builder contended that the complainant had mistakenly paid someone else, indicating possible miscommunication or administrative errors.
2. The second case involved a claim that the builder failed to comply with an earlier authority order, leading to a penalty on the builder of Rs. 2,97,000. This further highlights their struggles with following through on obligations, particularly in adhering to regulator mandates.

Cases Won

Interestingly, while Shree Jagannath Royal Builder has lost both of their legal battles, they did face two formal complaints that did not result in a win for them. Instead, the outcomes of these cases led to directives by authorities for the builder to fulfill their commitments:

• The first case resulted in the authority ordering the builder to execute the sale deed and provide the flat to the complainant within a stipulated two-month period.
• In the second case, although a claim was not filed by the builder, the authority imposed a financial penalty due to non-compliance, which could be considered a loss of reputation and financial credibility.

Patterns and Common Factors

• Failure to Deliver: Both cases emphasized the builder's inability to deliver on contractual promises.
• Legal Aftermath: The necessity for legal intervention signifies gaps in the builder's customer relationship management and operational processes.

• Intervention by Authorities: In both instances where the complainant brought forward grievances, it took authoritative intervention to guide the resolution, indicating a pattern of disputes reliant on external enforcement rather than voluntary compliance by the builder.

Conclusion and Assessment

The track record of Shree Jagannath Royal Builder raises several red flags for potential property buyers. With all formal complaints leading to unfavorable outcomes for the builder rather than positive customer experiences, buyers must proceed with caution.

Tips for Potential Buyers:

1. Due Diligence: Research any builder's history comprehensively, paying attention to past complaints and legal outcomes.
2. Ask Questions: Inquire directly about any legal issues and how the builder addresses client grievances.
3. Contracts Review: Ensure that all agreements specify clear timelines and obligations on the builder's part.
4. Seek References: Talk to previous clients or current residents about their experiences with the builder.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder:

• Check Reviews and Ratings: Online reviews can provide insights into customer satisfaction and builder reliability.
• Evaluate Project Portfolio: Assess previous projects to understand the quality and scale of work.
• Understand Financial Stability: A builder's financial health can directly influence their ability to complete projects.
• Transparency: Choose a builder willing to discuss their methods and address any concerns candidly.

In summary, while Shree Jagannath Royal Builder operates in the real estate space within Odisha, their legal challenges paint a concerning picture for prospective buyers. It is crucial to remain informed and vigilant when navigating such investments.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Jagannath Royal Builder, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with authority orders, and penalties for project delays.

The first type involves claims made by buyers who had paid for their flats in entirety, only to find that the builder failed to deliver possession as promised. In one notable case, the builder contended that the buyer had paid the wrong party, but this defense did not stand, leading to an order for the execution of the sale deed and possession transfer within two months. This highlights a pattern where builders may try to attribute delays to other parties or miscommunications, rather than acknowledging their own accountability.

The second theme revolves around the builder's non-compliance with orders passed by the Authority. In one case, the builder failed to adhere to a previous ruling, which resulted in a penalty of Rs. 2,97,000. This demonstrates a concerning trend where builders may not take legal obligations seriously, leading to additional financial costs and possibly further delays.

The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements, and misunderstandings of their obligations under the law. The builder's repeated attribution of delays to other parties suggests a defensive posture that may indicate underlying operational issues rather than a willingness to resolve disputes transparently.

Overall, these patterns should be alarming for potential buyers. They suggest a builder that has trouble delivering on promises and complying with legal standards, which could lead to significant inconveniences and financial losses for buyers who might face delays in obtaining their properties.