Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Krishna Enterprises, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. Notably, the primary concern revolves around regulatory compliance, specifically the builder's failure to adhere to the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) regulations.

The cases highlight a pattern in which Shree Krishna Enterprises was penalized for non-compliance, particularly for its failure to submit quarterly reports as mandated by the RERA. This reflects a broader issue often encountered in the real estate sector where builders may neglect regulatory obligations, which can lead to legal consequences, as seen in this case where the builder was imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases primarily involve contesting the penalties imposed for delays or regulatory breaches. Builders like Shree Krishna Enterprises often find themselves in dispute over their failure to fulfill obligations that are crucial for maintaining transparency and compliance within the real estate framework.

The outcomes of these cases indicate that builders tend to lose when they cannot provide adequate evidence of compliance or when they fail to meet regulatory requirements. In the case of Shree Krishna Enterprises, the imposition of a penalty suggests a systemic issue with their reporting practices, which likely stemmed from either a misunderstanding of their obligations or an inability to fulfill them.

Overall, these findings highlight the importance of regulatory compliance in the real estate sector and serve as a cautionary tale for builders regarding the legal and financial ramifications of non-compliance.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shree Krishna Enterprises, which it won, revealed the following information. These cases primarily focus on regulatory compliance and project documentation, highlighting the legal landscape in which builders operate. The issues often revolve around the builder's adherence to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) and the submission of necessary documents concerning project status and compliance.

One of the key themes identified is the 'Regulatory Compliance and Disputes.' Here, the builder faced opposition regarding claims of non-submission of vital reports on the RERA web portal. Such disputes illustrate the critical nature of regulatory adherence in the real estate sector and how misunderstandings or lack of clarity can trigger litigation.

Another recurring theme is 'Disputes Related to Project Documentation,' where the builder had to defend its actions related to project filings and approvals. In the case overview, claims made by the respondents often involved allegations of incomplete or improper documentation submitted by the builder, which the builder successfully refuted through official records.

The reasons Shree Krishna Enterprises commonly brought these cases to court include contesting penalties from regulatory bodies, disputing project delays often attributed to external factors, and legal challenges related to documentation compliance. Patterns that emerge from these disputes reveal a tendency for the builder to address what it sees as unjust claims, particularly accusations that stem from perceived lapses on their part regarding project documentation.

Moreover, the reasons the builder won these cases often stemmed from the other parties' failure to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims. In many instances, the builder was able to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements, effectively disputing allegations of non-compliance or incorrect submissions. This showcases the builder's diligence in maintaining accurate records and understanding of legal regulations.

This analysis highlights the builder's capacity to stand firm against claims that may be driven by misunderstandings or exaggerations from buyers or opposing entities. In the broader context of the real estate market, it's crucial for potential buyers to recognize that false accusations can impede builders' operations and challenge their reputations. Shree Krishna Enterprises' success in these cases underlines the importance of thorough documentation and compliance in navigating legal disputes.

In conclusion, potential buyers should approach their decisions with care and ensure they are informed. While disputes do arise in the real estate realm, understanding the specifics surrounding such cases can shed light on a builder's reliability. Analyzing the outcomes of disputes reveals that builders like Shree Krishna Enterprises often successfully defend themselves against unjust claims. Buyers are encouraged to consider reliable information and context before forming opinions about a builder's reputation.