CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the competitive real estate market of Gujarat, potential buyers look for reliable builders with a good track record. Shree Krishna Realty, while being relatively less known, has garnered attention in light of a recent legal case. This blog post delves into the performance of Shree Krishna Realty, examines the legal case outcomes, and offers advice for prospective buyers.
Shree Krishna Realty is based in Gujarat and has undertaken projects within the state. However, the builder has a record of receiving one complaint, out of which it has lost one case and won none. This paints a concerning picture for potential customers considering their investments.
The singular legal case filed against Shree Krishna Realty revealed significant information about their operational practices. The respondent claimed that delays in submitting a required quarterly report were due to tragic circumstances, specifically the death of an employee handling RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) work from COVID-19 and ongoing illness of a Chartered Accountant involved in the proceedings. The conclusion of this case resulted in the builder being fined Rs. 20,000 for noncompliance. This judgment indicates a lack of adherence to regulatory timelines, which is crucial in the real estate sector.
The case that Shree Krishna Realty lost highlights issues related to managerial delays and possibly inadequate contingency planning in the face of unexpected personal or health challenges among staff. While tragic circumstances were cited as a reason for the delay in the report submission, it raises questions about the robustness of the organizational structure and the ability to navigate through personnel crises without affecting compliance.
Interestingly, while the builder has not won any cases, the claim of unforeseen circumstances during the legal proceedings makes it clear that there may be mitigating factors at play. However, this does not negate the responsibility of the builder to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.
Based on the data provided, Shree Krishna Realty exhibits some troubling signs regarding its operational effectiveness and adherence to legal requirements. The fact that they lost their only legal case raises red flags for prospective buyers. The fine issued for failure to submit reports on time reflects the need for greater diligence and accountability.
If you are considering a purchase from Shree Krishna Realty, here are some considerations:
1. Check Reviews: Look for customer reviews and feedback on various platforms.
2. Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit properties completed by the builder to assess quality and craftsmanship.
3. Inquire About Liability Insurance: Ensure the builder has adequate insurance to protect your investment.
4. Understand the Contract: Read all agreements thoroughly and consult a legal advisor if necessary to uncover any clauses that may be unfavorable.
Purchasing property is a significant financial commitment. Understanding the reputation and reliability of builders like Shree Krishna Realty, as well as taking informed steps to safeguard your investment, is vital in making a successful and sustainable purchase.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Krishna Realty, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight two primary areas of concern: regulatory compliance issues and delays in reporting/project delays.
In terms of regulatory compliance, the builder faced challenges that reflect a broader pattern of non-adherence to legal requirements. The case in which the builder was fined for not submitting the quarterly report on time illustrates a significant concern regarding their ability to meet regulatory deadlines. Such failures not only incur financial penalties but also indicate a lack of procedural diligence, which could have implications for the integrity of their projects.
Delays in reporting and project delays emerged as another common theme. The builder's defense in one case centered around the COVID-19 pandemic and the illness of a key employee, which underscores the fact that project delays are often attributed to external factors. However, the underlying issue here is not only the delay itself but also the builder's reliance on individual employees for critical compliance tasks, suggesting potential systemic issues with their operational practices.
The reasons people brought cases against Shree Krishna Realty primarily revolved around contesting penalties and project delays. The builder's attempts to dispute these penalties often hinged on arguments of exceptional circumstances, yet the outcomes suggest that the legal framework does not readily accept such defenses. This pattern indicates a common trigger for litigation in the real estate sector, where builders may underestimate the rigor required for compliance and overestimate the acceptance of excuses for delays.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence to support their defenses. While they presented compelling narratives of hardship due to the pandemic and employee illnesses, the underlying requirement for timely compliance was not met. This shortfall highlights a recurring issue in the sector where builders fail to prioritize procedural requirements, leading to avoidable legal consequences.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!