SHREE MANAV INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder can play a significant role in the overall experience of property ownership. In this post, we will be examining Shree Manav Infrastructure Private Limited, a builder based in Gujarat, by looking at their legal track record, customer complaints, and what potential buyers should consider before making a decision.

Builder Overview

Shree Manav Infrastructure Private Limited appears to have a limited number of complaints associated with it, with only one recorded complaint. However, this single complaint has resulted in a lost case for the builder, raising concerns about their performance and commitment to fulfilling contractual obligations.

Legal Case Details

The sole legal case concerning Shree Manav Infrastructure involves a complaint from a customer who alleged delays in possession and the failure to register a sale deed as per the agreement. While the builder argued that the complainant had already received full compensation and was not entitled to further interest, the authority did allow the complaint in part. It concluded that the promoter must conduct the registration of the sale deed and hand over the unit’s possession.

Analysis of Legal Performance

• Losses: The builder lost one case due to failure to deliver timely possession and not adhering to the sale deed registration agreement. This indicates potential issues with project management and customer communication.
• Victories: Interestingly, the builder has not won any legal cases despite having a defensive stance in legal matters. This could imply a lack of effective management practices or inability to resolve disputes satisfactorily from the builder’s side.

Buyer Considerations

Given the legal challenges faced by Shree Manav Infrastructure, potential buyers should remain cautious:

1. Assess Communication: Ensure the builder has strong communication practices. Clear updates can mitigate issues related to delays.
2. Review Agreements Thoroughly: Pay close attention to the terms set out in the sale agreements, particularly clauses related to possession and deed registration.
3. Check Customer Reviews: While the complaint record is minimal, researching online reviews or seeking testimonials from other buyers could offer insights into the builder's reliability.
4. Consider Legal Counsel: Before signing any agreements, it might be beneficial to consult with a legal expert familiar with real estate to clarify any potential risks.

General Tips for Choosing a Builder

• Research Their Track Record: Look for builders with a strong history of completed projects and satisfied customers. Investigate any legal disputes and their outcomes.
• Visit Past Projects: If possible, visit previous developments by the builder to examine construction quality and overall satisfaction among residents.
• Ask for References: Don’t hesitate to ask the builder for references from previous clients. Speaking directly with other buyers can provide valuable insight into the builder's reliability.
• Understand Financial Standing: A financially stable builder is less likely to face project delays due to funding issues. Request information about their financial health if available.

Conclusion

Shree Manav Infrastructure Private Limited has shown some troubling signs through its legal encounters, particularly surrounding delays and contractual obligations. While one complaint does not paint the full picture, the builder’s single lost case is worth noting for potential buyers. By taking proactive steps and conducting diligent research, buyers can protect themselves and make informed decisions in the competitive real estate market.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Manav Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around three common topics: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with contractual obligations, and disputes over documentation and registration.

The majority of the claims made by the complainants fell under the category of delayed possession, where buyers asserted that the builder had failed to deliver units on time as per the agreement. This theme highlights an ongoing issue in the real estate sector where builders often face challenges in meeting project timelines, leading to dissatisfaction among buyers.

Non-compliance with contractual obligations was another significant theme, with buyers claiming that the builder had not adhered to the terms of the sale agreement, particularly concerning the registration of sale deeds. This points to a troubling trend where builders may neglect the legalities of property transactions, potentially jeopardizing buyers’ investments.

The disputes over documentation and registration stem from the builder's failure to execute and register sale deeds as mandated by the agreements. Buyers considered this vital for securing their property rights, and the builder's inaction led to legal consequences.

A common trigger for litigation in these cases was the builder's failure to fulfill their commitments, which raised concerns among buyers about their adherence to standards and responsibilities. Buyers often found themselves in the precarious position of having paid in full for units they had yet to receive, leading them to contest the builder’s actions legally.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to their non-compliance with contractual obligations and failure to provide timely documentation, which are critical in real estate transactions. The authorities ruled in favor of the buyers by emphasizing the importance of registered sale deeds and prompt possession, reflecting a legal system that aims to protect consumers in the real estate market.