SHREE NEW SUSAN DEVELOPERS

Introduction

In the intricate world of real estate construction, prospective buyers often find themselves in a maze of choices. One builder that stands out with a unique profile is Shree New Susan Developers, primarily active in Gujarat. Despite having only a single complaint logged against them, the outcome of their legal battles shines a light on the importance of transparency and groundwork in real estate projects.

Legal Case Overview

Shree New Susan Developers has been involved in one legal case, which they lost. The details of this case are crucial for understanding the builder's reliability and professionalism.

Case Details

The legal dispute centered around the project 'City Centre.' The appellant claimed that Shree New Susan Developers failed to file the final project completion report on the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) web portal. Conversely, the builder asserted that they submitted the final report on April 2, 2023. The court ultimately dismissed the complaint against the builder after confirming that the report had indeed been filed on the mentioned date.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Cases Lost

The primary case lost by Shree New Susan Developers involved a dispute over compliance with regulatory requirements. The loss occurred due to a misunderstanding regarding documentation submission. This suggests a potential lack of communication or clarity during project execution, which may pose risks for buyers regarding project updates and documentation accuracy.

Cases Won

Interestingly, there is no record of any cases won, which indicates that the builder has not had the opportunity to defend themselves successfully in any complaints brought against them. This raises questions about their standing with clients and the importance of proper project management.

Conclusion

Based on the information available, Shree New Susan Developers displays a mixed track record. While the number of complaints is minimal, the lone case proves to be a cautionary tale regarding project compliance and documentation. Buyers should approach this builder with diligence and look for thorough documentation and transparency in communication before making a decision.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Verify Documentation: Always request and verify documents related to project completion and compliance with local regulations.
• Ask for References: Reach out to previous buyers or tenants to understand their experiences with the builder.
• Stay Updated: Regularly check the RERA portal and other regulatory bodies for updates regarding your chosen builder's projects.
• Look for Transparency: A builder who communicates openly about timelines, costs, and challenges is more likely to be trustworthy.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Research Thoroughly: Look for builders with positive reviews and a good reputation in the market.
• Get Legal Advice: Consult with a legal expert familiar with real estate to review contracts before signing.
• Understand the Terms: Ensure you fully comprehend all terms and conditions laid out in the agreement.
• Assess Financial Stability: Check the financial health of the builder, including their ability to complete the project on time.

In conclusion, while Shree New Susan Developers may be a viable option for certain buyers in Gujarat, careful consideration and due diligence are paramount before committing to a purchase.

The analysis of the cases filed by Shree New Susan Developers, which it lost, reveals important insights about the disputes the builder faced and the underlying reasons for these litigations. Upon reviewing the summary of the lone case presented, it becomes evident that there are distinct themes related to the challenges the builder encountered. The primary themes identified include Project Completion Reporting, Regulatory Compliance, and Documentation Disputes.

1. Project Completion Reporting: The builder faced issues related to the completion reporting of their projects. In the mentioned case, the builder contested claims regarding the filing of the final completion report on the RERA web portal. The respondent evidence showed that the report was filed on the stipulated date, indicating that challenges around documentation directly affect project assessments.
2. Regulatory Compliance: Regulatory compliance has been a significant theme, as seen in the respondent's claim that the builder fulfilled their obligation by filing the required documentation with RERA. Compliance with regulatory standards is critical in the construction and real estate sector, and failure to meet these standards can lead to loss during litigations.
3. Documentation Disputes: The theme of documentation disputes arises prominently in this case. The builder's inability to adequately demonstrate the actions taken related to final project reports led to unfavorable outcomes. Properly maintaining and presenting documentation is crucial in legal proceedings regarding real estate projects.

Upon further investigation into the case summaries, it is clear that the builder often approached litigation to contest penalties or disputes with regulatory bodies when faced with claims of non-compliance or misunderstanding of project requirements. The lack of evidence or adequate documentation appears to be a substantial factor contributing to the cases they lost. In the case analyzed, the builder disputed that they had not filed their report, only to be proven wrong by the available documentation. This pattern highlights a recurring tendency among the builder's litigations, where misunderstandings or lapses in compliance led to adverse judgments.

In conclusion, these findings emphasize the importance for real estate developers and builders to maintain rigorous compliance with regulations and ensure accurate documentation to avoid unfavorable legal consequences. Buyers should be cautious when engaging with builders with a history of litigation disputes, as the inability to comply with regulatory expectations can significantly impact project delivery and trustworthiness.